It really isn't a cut and dry topic and most people should just accept that they aren't going to find that 'magic' job that has everything they want, for the pay they want and hours they want. THIS is reality. Job stability is way more satisfactory than being unemployed.
Other than government jobs, I've never heard of any well-paying remotely technical positions which don't require at least a fair amount of overtime (paid or otherwise) or weird hours.
Exterous said:The pay is bad
If one of the chief complaints is about long hours and too much work (including Saturdays) I think there is a difference between hoping for a 'magical job' and applying for one of the open positions in a nearby company that has 40 hour work weeks and is closed on the weekends.
These forums are full of people who purport to make great money at jobs they hate. They hope to retire early so they can begin life. In reality, they're only training themselves to be miserable for the rest of their life. It's what's become the American dream and a sure sign of how sick our society is.
These forums are full of people who purport to make great money at jobs they hate. They hope to retire early so they can begin life. In reality, they're only training themselves to be miserable for the rest of their life. It's what's become the American dream and a sure sign of how sick our society is.
If one of the chief complaints is about long hours and too much work (including Saturdays) I think there is a difference between hoping for a 'magical job' and applying for one of the open positions in a nearby company that has 40 hour work weeks and is closed on the weekends.
That only works if you're surrounded by people who are also extremely talented. Otherwise, sooner or later, the one super talented person keeps getting more and more work piled on them since they can actually get it done.Sounds like a lot of you have really shitty jobs.
Contrary to popular belief, there ARE companies out there that are ran well and actually do care about their employees as well as the work/life balance. You can make well over $100k without having to put in tons of overtime and also get extremely great benefits.
The problem is most people are too lazy to become extremely talented at their craft and are too lazy to actually push themself to become "better" because they are lazy. The ones that are talented can pick and choose where they work and go to well ran companies.
I mean just go out in public and look at how many fat people there are. It just shows you how lazy our society as a whole is. The one thing we have 100% complete control over (for most people) in our entire life people can't even manage properly because they are too lazy. No chance those people would be able to push hard enough to become extremely talented at their craft.
That only works if you're surrounded by people who are also extremely talented. Otherwise, sooner or later, the one super talented person keeps getting more and more work piled on them since they can actually get it done.
a common management problem and management's job to fix key man syndrome.
Why would they bother fixing it when they can get away with not fixing it?
<edit> I'll rephrase: most aren't fixing it. Which is Chaotic42's point.
Well yeah, good companies typically are full of talented people.That only works if you're surrounded by people who are also extremely talented. Otherwise, sooner or later, the one super talented person keeps getting more and more work piled on them since they can actually get it done.
What publicly visible metric do you use to determine if a company is a good one?Well yeah, good companies typically are full of talented people.
That's a good question and one that you can't really know the true answer to until you are working there. However I personally do use glassdoor as a reference. It's not the end all be all though. Any company I'm interested in I'd read the reviews for and it's pretty easy to get some sort of an overview of a company. But the problem is too a lot of smaller/newer companies don't have anything on there. But even looking at benefits and comments there, as well as just seeing a company's "about us" page on their website, with information about how they are ran, can let you know if a company is one you feel you would fit well with.What publicly visible metric do you use to determine if a company is a good one?
That's a good question and one that you can't really know the true answer to until you are working there. However I personally do use glassdoor as a reference. It's not the end all be all though. Any company I'm interested in I'd read the reviews for and it's pretty easy to get some sort of an overview of a company. But the problem is too a lot of smaller/newer companies don't have anything on there. But even looking at benefits and comments there, as well as just seeing a company's "about us" page on their website, with information about how they are ran, can let you know if a company is one you feel you would fit well with.
I guess to me, a "good" company is one that would be a good match for me culturally that also has good benefits and compensation. And obviously they would have to be successful.
EDIT:
I also think that in an interview you can get a good vibe of how the company is ran and if you'd be a good fit. But again that goes to the whole cultural fit part.
