Originally posted by: tweakmm
I disagree. There are a lot of bands that are better live and some that are better in the studio.Originally posted by: Rob9874
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
cause for the music I really like, i'm willing to pay?![]()
and for the music I like, I don't want a live version with slightly out of tune guitars, different versions of the melody, and hooting and hollering in the background.
Phish and String Cheese are two great examples of bands that are better live.
i saw string cheese a couple of years ago
their live stuff *is* better
same goes for keller williams, and the flecktones. but i like that stuff, and etree has been a favorite site of mine for a while now.
though it is true, some live recordings *suck*, and i dont keep all of what i download because some of it really is awful quality
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: chrisms
The media hasn't forced me to like anything. Most of the best artists ever have been extremely popular, not because the media told them to be but because they made great music.
I can only think of one and that is Pink Floyd.. which is actually much better live...
The best bands generally are live bands-Phish, Bela Fleck and the Flecktones specifically. I have 100s of live shows. Live phish are generally very good quality.. same with bela fleck.
i *so* want to see the flecktones again
its worth gettin something by the bela fleck trio, if you havent got any. some great stuff and they cover some flecktones tunes
