Why do people pay for music when they can get it legitimately for free?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

xSauronx

Lifer
Jul 14, 2000
19,582
4
81
Originally posted by: tweakmm
Originally posted by: Rob9874
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
cause for the music I really like, i'm willing to pay? :confused:

and for the music I like, I don't want a live version with slightly out of tune guitars, different versions of the melody, and hooting and hollering in the background.
I disagree. There are a lot of bands that are better live and some that are better in the studio.

Phish and String Cheese are two great examples of bands that are better live.

i saw string cheese a couple of years ago
their live stuff *is* better
same goes for keller williams, and the flecktones. but i like that stuff, and etree has been a favorite site of mine for a while now.

though it is true, some live recordings *suck*, and i dont keep all of what i download because some of it really is awful quality

Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: chrisms
The media hasn't forced me to like anything. Most of the best artists ever have been extremely popular, not because the media told them to be but because they made great music.

I can only think of one and that is Pink Floyd.. which is actually much better live...
The best bands generally are live bands-Phish, Bela Fleck and the Flecktones specifically. I have 100s of live shows. Live phish are generally very good quality.. same with bela fleck.

i *so* want to see the flecktones again

its worth gettin something by the bela fleck trio, if you havent got any. some great stuff and they cover some flecktones tunes
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
Originally posted by: chrisms
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: chrisms
The media hasn't forced me to like anything. Most of the best artists ever have been extremely popular, not because the media told them to be but because they made great music.

I can only think of one and that is Pink Floyd.. which is actually much better live...
The best bands generally are live bands-Phish, Bela Fleck and the Flecktones specifically. I have 100s of live shows. Live phish are generally very good quality.. same with bela fleck.

Bob Dylan, Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, Soundgarden, Pearl Jam, all extremely popular artists that were shoved down our throats but I still think make great music. There are more examples but I tried to list only ones that I thought would have more of a universal appeal.

I agree with the exception of Pearl Jam. Very well put and I have to admit ... I can't get free live soundgarden tunes. Atleast not htat I know of. Whata band!
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
It's funny ... seems like half the people that have DLed free live music get it. Atleast they understand that alot of good free music is out there in addition to what they buy.

Others that have not even considered it have gone off the deep end. Interesting... I guess it's that whole ignorance is bliss thing.
 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
It's funny ... seems like half the people that have DLed free live music get it. Atleast they understand that alot of good free music is out there in addition to what they buy.

Others that have not even considered it have gone off the deep end. Interesting... I guess it's that whole ignorance is bliss thing.

I think it's more because you make it sound as if all you listen to is free music and anyone who paid for music is a douche. At least, that's what it comes off as to me anyway.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
why are you posting on the internet when you could print up some posters and hang them on telephone poles ?

some people just don't get it.

 

chrisms

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2003
6,615
0
0
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
It's funny ... seems like half the people that have DLed free live music get it. Atleast they understand that alot of good free music is out there in addition to what they buy.

Others that have not even considered it have gone off the deep end. Interesting... I guess it's that whole ignorance is bliss thing.

I just don't listen to much music. I'm aware that independent labels do exist and produce good bands, but since I don't listen enough all my favorite bands still sound fresh to me. When I was into music I'd get all sorts of crazy stuff, from R.L. Burnside to Primus. These days I stick with the stuff I know because the 10 minutes per week I do listen to music I am not trying to experiment.
 

bearxor

Diamond Member
Jul 8, 2001
6,605
3
81
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
It's funny ... seems like half the people that have DLed free live music get it. Atleast they understand that alot of good free music is out there in addition to what they buy.

Others that have not even considered it have gone off the deep end. Interesting... I guess it's that whole ignorance is bliss thing.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Half of the people who have downloaded free live music get "it".

Do you have any numbers as to what percentage of the population has downloaded free live music? The total, not the number that get "it". You've made it clear with your undeniable facts that half the people that have downloaded free live music don't get "it".

I'm just curious as to the percentage of people who have downloaded so that i can then figure out how many people in the world are ignorant.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
Originally posted by: bearxor
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
It's funny ... seems like half the people that have DLed free live music get it. Atleast they understand that alot of good free music is out there in addition to what they buy.

Others that have not even considered it have gone off the deep end. Interesting... I guess it's that whole ignorance is bliss thing.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Half of the people who have downloaded free live music get "it".

Do you have any numbers as to what percentage of the population has downloaded free live music? The total, not the number that get "it". You've made it clear with your undeniable facts that half the people that have downloaded free live music don't get "it".

I'm just curious as to the percentage of people who have downloaded so that i can then figure out how many people in the world are ignorant.

You might want to read the entire thread before blathering. MIght want to r-read the post you responded to while your at it
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
OK ...requesting mods lock this. To many people that havn't even bothered researching what bands allow free live downloads are busy ranting. Kinda pointless. Most don't even realize that the bands they love might actually have even more material they would love equally avaialble for free download.

/thread
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,162
126
The op is basically saying "stop liking music you have to pay for, and only like music that is free."

Yeah...that'll work.
 

NaOH

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2006
5,015
0
0
Even if bands that I like offered free music downloads of their live performances, I'm not going to stop buying their music.
 

rox1co

Senior member
Jul 19, 2005
614
0
0
this thread is amusing. i'll be nice and keep my opinion to myself about the OP.

:)
 

LordMorpheus

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2002
6,871
1
0
I get some music from archive.org, but there are lots of artists I like that don't give their recordings away for free, and lots of artists that sound much better in the studio. I'll buy their music.