Why do Liberals & Dems think Hillary is the best person to nominate?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,964
2
0
Polling data at this stage of the election is almost meaningless.


Perhaps, but when earlier polling had her way ahead of EVERYBODY and now much less so the TREND suggests a problem. Looking over the recent past for a reason that might explain her slide and ....................................................... EMAILS!


Brian
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
Perhaps, but when earlier polling had her way ahead of EVERYBODY and now much less so the TREND suggests a problem. Looking over the recent past for a reason that might explain her slide and ....................................................... EMAILS!


Brian

Don't Worry Clinton will be nominated. Sanders is banished from the Dem side just like Trump is banished from the Rep side.

You will get your choice, Bush or Clinton LOLOL
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,175
9,159
136
Don't Worry Clinton will be nominated. Sanders is banished from the Dem side just like Trump is banished from the Rep side.

You will get your choice, Bush or Clinton LOLOL

Are you still pretending to be a VerySeriousPerson™

Trump is an absolute joke.

Jeb will be lucky to win anything near what Rmoney won.

Welcome in your new female overlord.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,854
4,966
136
Yes Trump will be neutralized by the establishment and bush will be nominated, and the other side of the fence somehow believes Clinton is this amazing person that will do good for the middle class.

I am amazed that she is considered such a great candidate for nomination. Man they must really be lacking in good qualified candidates.

Yeah bush 2016 will happen.

Rick Perry WILL be your next President?

giphy-facebook_s.jpg
 
Last edited:

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,964
2
0
I'll give Trump this much ... he nailed Jeb for his lack of effort and seeming lack of desire to mix it up. I'd figured Jeb to be the Republican nominee, but he might not even make the top 5 if things keep going the way they are. All those Republican spin masters and former lackeys from his brothers admin must be really shitting themselves over Jeb's tepid performance thus far.

Hillary's still the favorite but losing ground and we're still more than 14 months from the election.

Could it really wind up being a Sanders versus Trump election?


Brian
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
I consider Hillary Clinton to be a technocrat. She knows government. She knows people and built relationships in the Senate and got things done. Obama gave fancy speeches and was very telegenic but he left the business of governing to others. I want someone who will get in there and solve some problems instead of just talking about it.

That would be basically delegation of authority, it is what politicians are elected to do to a large degree.

It's a matter of who you elect to delegate people and their staff.

And no, Obama did not just walk off into limbo land like Dubya did.

YMMV I guess.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
She does not have the physical stamina to finish the job. Too many oracles floating out there, for her to deal with. Once one's integrity has been lost, one does not regain it, at this point in life, in time, to be elected. Bill got a blow job, but Hillary is about to take the hardest fucking she's ever had in her life...and it won't be from her lover's strap on.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
She does not have the physical stamina to finish the job. Too many oracles floating out there, for her to deal with. Once one's integrity has been lost, one does not regain it, at this point in life, in time, to be elected. Bill got a blow job, but Hillary is about to take the hardest fucking she's ever had in her life...and it won't be from her lover's strap on.

Needs more Benghazi.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
The media ... go figure.
Claiming Hillary's poll numbers have dropped in iOwa.
Anyone notice in this scathing poll that Joe Biden was included, who isn't even running?
Joe is getting 14% in Iowa, Hillary 37%. Hillary was getting 57%.
Do the math media guys, 37% + 14% = 51%.
So if Joe had not been included, I have no doubts Hillary would have polled at least 51% in iOwa.
And remember, Joe is just entering his 15 minutes of political fame.
14% at this stage is nothing to brag about, or predict the demise of Hillary.
I'm sure Hillary will get her 14 points back sooner or later.
And look at the republicans...
If not so many were running, Trump might have 57% too.
Or, god forbid Ben Carson at 57%.
But, speaking of iOwa, they are nuts. At least iOwan republicans are nuts.
They elected Huckabee or was it Santorum?
Talk about I-diots O-ut W-alking A-round....
 
Last edited:

Tombstone1881

Senior member
Aug 8, 2014
486
161
116
Why do Liberals & Dems think Hillary is the best person to nominate?

This is a riot!
I can't wait for the "Why do Conservatives & Reps think Trump is the best person to nominate?" thread! :biggrin:
 

Tombstone1881

Senior member
Aug 8, 2014
486
161
116
She does not have the physical stamina to finish the job. Too many oracles floating out there, for her to deal with. Once one's integrity has been lost, one does not regain it, at this point in life, in time, to be elected.
It seems to me that we've heard that one before.
Like when she ran for senate.
And was picked to be Secy of State.
So far, it looks like the same old accusations will fail the same old way.
 

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,964
2
0
The media ... go figure.
Claiming Hillary's poll numbers have dropped in iOwa.
Anyone notice in this scathing poll that Joe Biden was included, who isn't even running?
Joe is getting 14% in Iowa, Hillary 37%. Hillary was getting 57%.
Do the math media guys, 37% + 14% = 51%.
So if Joe had not been included, I have no doubts Hillary would have polled at least 51% in iOwa.
And remember, Joe is just entering his 15 minutes of political fame.
14% at this stage is nothing to brag about, or predict the demise of Hillary.
I'm sure Hillary will get her 14 points back sooner or later.
And look at the republicans...
If not so many were running, Trump might have 57% too.
Or, god forbid Ben Carson at 57%.
But, speaking of iOwa, they are nuts. At least iOwan republicans are nuts.
They elected Huckabee or was it Santorum?
Talk about I-diots O-ut W-alking A-round....


Yeah, maybe, but this is looking a whole lot like 2007/2008 when she was the odds on favorite to win but didn't. I don't know that Bernie is this seasons Obama but this seasons Hillary is looking a lot like the Hillary of two seasons ago.


Brian
 

Bart*Simpson

Senior member
Jul 21, 2015
602
4
36
www.canadaka.net
What's your electoral map? How do you see bush winning?

I'm a libertarian Republican and I've been asked who I'd vote for if the race came down to Hillary or Bush and I've said I will vote for the honest candidate: Whichever of them admits to being a Democrat! :whiste:
 

marincounty

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2005
3,227
5
76
Hillary and Trump are the only candidates running that have any balls. The rest of them are afraid of telling the truth or have no idea what the truth is.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136

Well, that puts the Clintons in some interesting company. Hitchens attacked figures from Kissinger to Mother Teresa & everybody in between.

A non-partisan slime artist with an interesting style, a Hunter S Thompson wannabee.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,974
140
106
They are desperate to find anybody they can to forward the reckless liberal agenda. The bigger the crook..the better. What bigger crook then a clinton??
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Why do Liberals & Dems think Hillary is the best person to nominate?

This is a riot!
I can't wait for the "Why do Conservatives & Reps think Trump is the best person to nominate?" thread! :biggrin:

There are 6 of them on the first page.
 

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,757
619
121
It's so funny how the Demonuts just have a Socialist, a criminal and a few others I have no damn clue who they are. On the Republican side you have a CEO, brain surgeon, mega billionaire CEO, and a whole hell of a lot of common sense.

To me the Democrat party is not the party of the 60's. It's turned into a damn quasi-socialist party. It's truly pathetic.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,977
11,119
136
It's so funny how the Demonuts just have a Socialist, a criminal and a few others I have no damn clue who they are. On the Republican side you have a CEO, brain surgeon, mega billionaire CEO, and a whole hell of a lot of common sense.

To me the Democrat party is not the party of the 60's. It's turned into a damn quasi-socialist party. It's truly pathetic.

Thank you for illustrating perfectly why 71% of Republicans think Obama was not born in the USA. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
Well, that puts the Clintons in some interesting company. Hitchens attacked figures from Kissinger to Mother Teresa & everybody in between.

A non-partisan slime artist with an interesting style, a Hunter S Thompson wannabee.

Yeah. Bad company. Love these quotes...

Mrs. Clinton "is a tyrant and a bully when she can dare to be, and an ingratiating populist when that will serve... like him (Bill) she is not just a liar but a lie; a phony construct of shreds and patches and hysterical, self-pitying, demagogic improvisations."

Doesn't sound anything like hst either. He never does.
 
Last edited: