Originally posted by: shady06
	
	
		
		
			Originally posted by: mechBgon
I fixed it but here it is again:  
http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/mechBgon/Irony.gif
		 
		
	 
WTF? cant expect much more from MS i guess
		
 
		
	 
Well, to be fair to them, they were under DDoS attack by one of the big-time worms at the time, Blaster if I recall correctly.  But I couldn't help a chuckle or two :evil:
Ooookay, drifted off topic a bit 

  I have to agree that mailing flyers and publishing ads boasting about a ~$399 system (with 128MB of RAM) is a cheap shot, since a lot of buyers won't realize that 128MB of RAM isn't enough for the system to run anywhere near its full potential (whatever that might be with slow hard drives, Celerons as a CPU option, and onboard video, plus single-channel DDR on some of the budget models).
I've read Dell's printed catalogs and they do discuss how more RAM enables the computer to run more programs simultaneously, and they do say something to the effect that "most Dementia 2400 buyers choose 256MB of RAM," dropping a hint that there's a reason to opt for more RAM.
Still, even 256MB of (single-channel) RAM, minus the chunk allocated to the onboard video (32MB?) is not much for a WinXP system with antivirus software.  So the author's point is valid insofar as it goes.  The bigger offense in my mind, however, is consumer-oriented computers that don't even have AGP slots on the motherboard.  :frown:  I mean, at least you 
can add RAM.  :frown:  Try adding an AGP port.