Originally posted by: redgtxdi
Let me re-word that for you then..... Burden of "disproof". (of his stats).Originally posted by: bsobel
Actually it's not. The burden is on the person making the claim. See, I can say that 100% of your posts for fully of hatred for others. It would be up to me to prove that, not you to prove me wrong. Same point here.The burden of proof is on you to prove otherwise.
Yours needs proving themselves, actually. (and by your own words, no?)
Franks' exact words from an article he wrote. Please show where *any* connection is shown between these two points:
"Nine European nations have had same-sex marriage since the early 90s?and just 2 percent of same-sex couples in these countries ever bother to marry, NOTE: HINT THIS IS WHERE THE FALSE CONNECTION IS STATED while there has been a 46 percent increase in out-of-wedlock births. Same-sex couples simply do not marry in significant number when given the legal right to do so, while more heterosexual couples will not bother to get married before having children. (NOTE: PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW ALLOWING SAME SEX MARRIAGE CAUSS HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES TO NOT GET MARRIED BEFORE HAVING CHILDREN. In these nations, 70 percent of all births now take place outside of marriage, and among first-time mothers, 80 percent are unmarried. Same-sex marriage will result in fewer total marriages and more children born out of wedlock." <-- FALSE CONCLUSION, NO FACTS STATES SUPPORT THIS OPINION.
Thats easy, he simply quoted two numbers and provided no connection. Any reasonable person reading that paragraph sees that.You need to make the connection that Frank's stats have....."zero" correlation.
In his paper Frank goes on to say:
"The combined effects of the pill, condom distribution, abortion on demand, no-fault divorce and the acceptance of illegitimacy have been socially and economically devastating. Half of all American marriages now end in divorce. One-third of all American children are now born outside of marriage"
So, he's really blaming the pill, condoms, abortion, and no fault divorce. But since it served his purpose, he's tried to claim its the allowance of gay marriage. He can't have it both ways, yet he's on the record claiming both.