I've barely paid attention to the Afghanistan mess. I'd assumed that Biden pulled the last of our troops out and then the government collapsed before we could get the civvies out. But now I'm reading that our troops have not been pulled out and we actually added 5000 more to assist with the drawdown. So maybe someone can articulate exactly what it is that Biden did wrong here?
It's not impossible to conquer, it can assimilated if India ever wakes up, calls the Pakistani mullah's bluff and annexes most of the land to the east of Kandahar (Arabised version of Gandhar, Kafir+Gandhar), this was all India less than 200 years go (not just in antiquity) and not even under a Muslim ruler (under the Hindu/Sikh Ranjit Singh). Chances of any one in the current Indian state having that kind of balls -0.00001%Very informative info on why the U.S. mission to Afghanistan was doomed to fail as the British Empire had failed there in the 19th century and as the Soviets had failed in the 1980s. The cultural, geographic, border aspects figure prominently in this.
I posted this in another thread but maybe this is a better place to get an answer:
No need to nuke. Doing nothing at all will be good enough.New strategy: Leave Afghanistan, get everyone who wants evac'ed out. Let Taliban take over Kabul. Nuke from orbit while most are in one place?
Profit?
Nobody wants mortars landing on the airport while trying to get the planes off the ground. Keep in mind each plane coming in probably unloads military supplies, loads up with civilians, and then leaves.Taliban violently block Australian citizens from Kabul airport evacuation flights
Not just Americans and Afghans trapped behind enemy lines. People from across the world were on the ground in support of the NATO mission. Cannot tell if the Taliban's blockade of the airport is an organized securing of prisoners or random thugs detached from a central command. But there is this message from those on the ground.
“No one can get inside,” one man said. “The Taliban are stopping everybody.”
Turning over their platforms to partisan Republicans and pro-war military experts, the media seemed eager to portray President Joe Biden as one being swallowed up in “crisis,” even as his call to withdraw troops has drawn overwhelming, bipartisan support at home.
Axios laid it on thick. Doubling as a GOP springboard, the news outlet made sweeping factual declarations in its news coverage: “Rarely has an American president's predictions been so wrong, so fast, so convincingly as Biden on Afghanistan.”
Raise your hand if you remember the predictions President George W. Bush made about invading Iraq, long before the U.S. spent $2 trillion and more than 500,000 people died.
The CIA was offering increasingly dire predictions this summer, but Defense analysts were still being "optimistic" about Afghan security forces. Even amongst the pessimistic intelligence analysts, they said a quick collapse was becoming more likely but they weren't telling the President that it was certain. This is how intelligence works, it's probabilistic rather than spot-on predictive.He either was getting bad intel suggesting that Afghan security forces would hold out for several months, and on that basis, assumed there would be little problem getting everyone out, or he never got such intel and just assumed it, in which case he screwed up.
I also find myself wondering how I and others here, in the media, congress, etc would be reacting if this had played out exactly this way but under Trump.
Would we be calling for impeachment?
Also, the Dems are not oblivious to political reality. I agreed with both impeachments because they fit the crimes, despite all of us knowing Senate Repugs would acquit. House Dems would not take a third bite of this rotten apple knowing the end game would be the same. If fomenting an insurrection doesn't meet the bar for the GQP, then it's obvious that many "high crimes and misdemeanors" wouldn't either.No. Because it isn't corrupt or illegal.
See, this is what is confusing me. We had 2500 troops with plans to add 4000 to help with drawdown on the 15th. Here you are saying we drew down troops when we were planning on adding more? That makes no sense to me. What am I missing?... Obviously the sequencing is suspect; rapidly drawing down the troops ahead of Aug. 31st before evacuating Americans, let alone Afghanis who qualify for special visas. ...
Getting aggressive is not going to solve anything unless it is fully committed to clearing the Taliban far enough from the runways that Taliban are incapable of hitting it with indirect fire. This is not going to be possible unless the logistics allow it, and they are just airlift logistics right now.
Perhaps we can bribe them with the Afghan funds we hold.