Electronic speed limiters...Originally posted by: Kalvin00
Because if a car maxed out at 80 mph it would take 5 miles to get to 60 mph.
Originally posted by: jfall
I rarely ever see any place that the allowable speed limit is over 85. If speeding is such a concern, why are auto makers allowed to produce vehicles which can knowingly be used to break the law?
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Because a minority of us actually know how to handle our cars.
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: jfall
I rarely ever see any place that the allowable speed limit is over 85. If speeding is such a concern, why are auto makers allowed to produce vehicles which can knowingly be used to break the law?
Why is this something that should be legislated? Make the law, allow cars to be produced however the manufacturer wants to produce them, and if the owner breaks the law, they suffer the consequences. If the market on the whole wants speed-limited cars, then manufacturers will make them. Since there is no demand for such a thing, there is no production of such a thing (although in reality many cars are in fact limited, but not to the extent that you suggest). Let the market decide, not some nanny state.
Originally posted by: aplefka
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: jfall
I rarely ever see any place that the allowable speed limit is over 85. If speeding is such a concern, why are auto makers allowed to produce vehicles which can knowingly be used to break the law?
Why is this something that should be legislated? Make the law, allow cars to be produced however the manufacturer wants to produce them, and if the owner breaks the law, they suffer the consequences. If the market on the whole wants speed-limited cars, then manufacturers will make them. Since there is no demand for such a thing, there is no production of such a thing (although in reality many cars are in fact limited, but not to the extent that you suggest). Let the market decide, not some nanny state.
Don't pretty much all cars made in the last like 15 years have governors (sp?)?
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: aplefka
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: jfall
I rarely ever see any place that the allowable speed limit is over 85. If speeding is such a concern, why are auto makers allowed to produce vehicles which can knowingly be used to break the law?
Why is this something that should be legislated? Make the law, allow cars to be produced however the manufacturer wants to produce them, and if the owner breaks the law, they suffer the consequences. If the market on the whole wants speed-limited cars, then manufacturers will make them. Since there is no demand for such a thing, there is no production of such a thing (although in reality many cars are in fact limited, but not to the extent that you suggest). Let the market decide, not some nanny state.
Don't pretty much all cars made in the last like 15 years have governors (sp?)?
yes, but my point there was to say that none of those cars were limited because of legality issues, as the OP proposes
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Because a minority of us actually know how to handle our cars.
Originally posted by: jfall
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: aplefka
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: jfall
I rarely ever see any place that the allowable speed limit is over 85. If speeding is such a concern, why are auto makers allowed to produce vehicles which can knowingly be used to break the law?
Why is this something that should be legislated? Make the law, allow cars to be produced however the manufacturer wants to produce them, and if the owner breaks the law, they suffer the consequences. If the market on the whole wants speed-limited cars, then manufacturers will make them. Since there is no demand for such a thing, there is no production of such a thing (although in reality many cars are in fact limited, but not to the extent that you suggest). Let the market decide, not some nanny state.
Don't pretty much all cars made in the last like 15 years have governors (sp?)?
yes, but my point there was to say that none of those cars were limited because of legality issues, as the OP proposes
What other reasons are there for governers?
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
where did you find an 85 mph speed limit?
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
where did you find an 85 mph speed limit?
Out here in the Mojave Desert there are a couple of places where you see signs that say:
"End 75" and thats it. Not any other signs telling you what speed you CAN drive at.
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: jfall
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: aplefka
Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Originally posted by: jfall
I rarely ever see any place that the allowable speed limit is over 85. If speeding is such a concern, why are auto makers allowed to produce vehicles which can knowingly be used to break the law?
Why is this something that should be legislated? Make the law, allow cars to be produced however the manufacturer wants to produce them, and if the owner breaks the law, they suffer the consequences. If the market on the whole wants speed-limited cars, then manufacturers will make them. Since there is no demand for such a thing, there is no production of such a thing (although in reality many cars are in fact limited, but not to the extent that you suggest). Let the market decide, not some nanny state.
Don't pretty much all cars made in the last like 15 years have governors (sp?)?
yes, but my point there was to say that none of those cars were limited because of legality issues, as the OP proposes
What other reasons are there for governers?
safety. After a certain point cars can either go too fast for their tires or exceed aerodynamic safety limits. It still boils down to the manufacturer not installing it to conform to an artificial speed limit.