why are blacks a key constituency for democrats?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
In the House, there's like 35+ African American Democrats and one Republican from FLA.

And this is because the Repubs in general really care for and represent their black constituency well? lol

Now if you could please show where there's a bunch of black republicans that are running and not being elected ...kind of hard to "represent their black constituency" when they aren't putting up candidates. Of course. Then again, I thought blacks were Americans too, so anyone in the House is representing them as their constituency.
 

forhonor

Junior Member
May 26, 2011
7
0
0
In the House, there's like 35+ African American Democrats and one Republican from FLA.

And this is because the Repubs in general really care for and represent their black constituency well? lol

hahaha

African-American Democrats in the House like Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters?

By the conditions of their districts, it would tough to say they are really representing their constituents.

Give me a break.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,162
136
During the civil rights push by LBJ in the 60's, LBJ had to twist as many democratic arms as republican arms in congress to get his bill passed.
And democrats in congress have always been better at lip service when it comes to supporting minorities, than have the republicans. But that is not to say democrats actually following through more often.
I look at it this way... Democrats were in full charge in all branches of government for many long years of times past. And few if any social issues became reality.
It almost always took a hell bent president to twist the needed arms to get his social issue bill(s) passed. And correct me if Im wrong... but with all that lip service on the democrat side during all those democratic majority years, we never seen any real healthcare change until Richard Nixon came along with the HMO.
Hell.. Democrats were in charge during Obama's healthcare reform. And what was the "new" in the democratic controlled congress? Blue Dogs.
Democrats against democratic principals.
Who needed enemies when Obama had those blue dog democrats.
So why blacks support the democrats is beyond me.

And as to that MSNBC Maddow show, if you actually watched it, Maddow had video footage of black democrat congress members bashing Obama to their voting constituents, but then the congress member added that "we still need to stand behind THIS president, regardless".
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
During the civil rights push by LBJ in the 60's, LBJ had to twist as many democratic arms as republican arms in congress to get his bill passed.
And democrats in congress have always been better at lip service when it comes to supporting minorities, than have the republicans. But that is not to say democrats actually following through more often.

And that's false. Democrats have consistently supported blacks' interests better.

I look at it this way... Democrats were in full charge in all branches of government for many long years of times past. And few if any social issues became reality.

And that's false. Racism was pretty bi-partisan (and, as I said, strongest in the South) until the early 60's. But after the shift starting under JFK, Democrats definitely passed things supporting blacks, after a long history of their being discriminated against.

The civil rights bills and the War on Poverty were just two measures especially in blacks' interest (and probably the most important measures ever passed for blacks).

It almost always took a hell bent president to twist the needed arms to get his social issue bill(s) passed.

Yes, but which party had the hell-bent presidents to do so? JFK knew his whole legislative agenda was at risk if he pushed civil rights, and it made him delay, but he then stuck his neck way out on the issue, and LBJ's quote about supporting the Civil Rights bill in spite of handing the White House to Republicans for decades to come speaks to his priority - while Republicans exploited anti-black feelings.

And correct me if Im wrong... but with all that lip service on the democrat

The word is democratic, not democrat.

side during all those democratic majority years, we never seen any real healthcare change until Richard Nixon came along with the HMO.

Really? Where did medical programs start? Under FDR. Who supported expanding them but couldn't get it past Congress? Truman. Who had a major campaign platform of expanding Medicare? JFK. You remember, this is where Ronald Reagan got his start in politics, when the AMA hired him to record an album sent around the country to oppose JFK's medicare expansion, 'Ronald Reagan speaks against socialized medicine'. Who expanded it more? LBJ.

Nixon's HMO effort is pretty much the only Republican measure helping it.

Hell.. Democrats were in charge during Obama's healthcare reform. And what was the "new" in the democratic controlled congress? Blue Dogs.
Democrats against democratic principals.
Who needed enemies when Obama had those blue dog democrats.
So why blacks support the democrats is beyond me.

Yes, which is why it's important to discuss Democrats as different groups: progressives, and corporatists or blue dogs. Blacks generally support progressive Democrats; blue dogs tend to be more white districts, though they can be the 'less bad' option from a Republican where the voters don't choose a progressive.

Progressives supported much stronger healthcare measure. They lacked the votes in Congress, and a progressive President, to get that done.

But the Democratic House DID pass a public option.

In fact, they had a majority to do so, but the Republicans abused the filibuster and blocked them, since they 'only' had a majority, not 60 votes.

And as to that MSNBC Maddow show, if you actually watched it, Maddow had video footage of black democrat congress members bashing Obama to their voting constituents, but then the congress member added that "we still need to stand behind THIS president, regardless".

What's so hard for you to understand about their having strong criticisms of Obama but his still being much better than the disasters of Republican candidates?
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
They were the opposition to the Civil Rights in the 60s, they are the opposition now to Gay Rights. Dispute that if you can.

The Republicans that are against Gay rights today are really Democrats... just like the Democrats that were against civil rights were really Republicans we come to realize when it is convenient....

Save234
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,665
54,640
136
Prove it.

Find me multiple statements by Republicans about how they ran a racist campaign to win over southern white voters.

And you can skip the 'states rights' code word and the one statement by Kevin Phillips.

I want quotes proving a 'racist strategy' existed. That they ran on a racist platform and supported racist ideas.

It is one thing to say that the Republicans took advantage of the problems within the Democratic party post 1964 it is another to suggest that they did so by offering racism to southern voters.

And let's not forget the idea that the rise of Republican power in the south matches the rise of the middle class in the south and that the middle class voted Republican because they more closely matched their economic views.

How about when the head of the RNC explicitly apologized to the NAACP for running racist campaigns in the south?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/13/AR2005071302342.html

That took me about 10 seconds to find. Delusion on this level has to be willful at this point.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,642
8,181
136
Now if you could please show where there's a bunch of black republicans that are running and not being elected ...kind of hard to "represent their black constituency" when they aren't putting up candidates. Of course. Then again, I thought blacks were Americans too, so anyone in the House is representing them as their constituency.

Kind'a tells you something don't it?



hahaha

African-American Democrats in the House like Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters?

By the conditions of their districts, it would tough to say they are really representing their constituents.

Give me a break.

OK, let's play a simple math game. For every black Dem Congressperson (present or former) you can name that seems flaky to you, I'll name twice as many white Repub Congresspersons (present or former) that make the ones you name look like celebate geniuses. Let's start with Tom DeLay and Richard Nixon. :p
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Hard to tell actually.

Remember all those videos from the 2008 election of racist Democrats from West Virginia?

The little old ladies who were voting for Hillary because Obama was a black man, not that they actually said that, but anyone could read between the lines.

If you look at the vote break down in the 2008 Democratic Primary you will see that the Appalachian region (which is very Democratic) voted strongly for Hillary.

The purple areas are where Hillary took 65% or more of the vote. West Va went all purple as did most of Kentucky. And West VA is very Democrat and very anti-black.
Blog_Clinton_Appalachia.gif
Lol, are you really niave enough to think a membger of the Klan would vote for Hillary Clinton?
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Lol, are you really niave enough to think a membger of the Klan would vote for Hillary Clinton?
Read this article and explain it away please


West Virginia: Country's Most Racist Voters
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-k-wilson/west-virginia-countrys-mo_b_101651.html
Fully 20% of the voters consisted of whites who reported that race was a factor, and they voted for Clinton 84-10 over Obama. That's a total racist vote of 17%, exceeding the racist vote in all of the previous primaries where exit polls were taken, and going far above the 13.7% in Arkansas, the most racist state before now in this election.
Democrats dominate West Virginia politics.
Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Auditor, Treasurer, Agriculture Commissioner and both Senators are Democrat.

That is EVERY state wide elected office.

The most racist state in the country, according Huffington Post, and completely controlled by Democrats...
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
And that's false. Democrats have consistently supported blacks' interests better.
Except when they were passing Jim Crow laws or enforcing segregation or creating 'separate but equal or passing voter taxes to keep blacks from voting etc etc etc.


Maybe you should have amended your statement to reflect the truth a little better. National Democrats have done a lot to help blacks, but local southern Democrats have an awful track record
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
How about when the head of the RNC explicitly apologized to the NAACP for running racist campaigns in the south?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/13/AR2005071302342.html

That took me about 10 seconds to find. Delusion on this level has to be willful at this point.
Your claim was
The idea that Republicans ran on a racist strategy came by their own admission. This isn't a secret. Just how brainwashed are you?
Your link does NOT prove that there was a racist strategy.

The title of the story is:
"RNC Chief to Say It Was 'Wrong' to Exploit Racial Conflict for Votes"

They exploited the gap created by Civil rights to appeal to white southerns in national elections. But you still haven't provided proof that they did so by running a 'racist' campaign.

Where is the racism that Republicans offered to white southern voters?

Are you suggesting that Barry Goldwater was a racist?

How about Nixon? The guy who pushed for large-scale integration of southern schools? In the fall of 1968, 68 percent of black children in the South were attending all-black schools. By 1974, that number had fallen to 8 percent. But in your view Nixon won the south by using a 'racist strategy'??

Is that your claim? That Republicans only won in the south by offering MORE racism than the Democrats?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,665
54,640
136
Your claim was

Your link does NOT prove that there was a racist strategy.

The title of the story is:
"RNC Chief to Say It Was 'Wrong' to Exploit Racial Conflict for Votes"

They exploited the gap created by Civil rights to appeal to white southerns in national elections. But you still haven't provided proof that they did so by running a 'racist' campaign.

Where is the racism that Republicans offered to white southern voters?

Are you suggesting that Barry Goldwater was a racist?

How about Nixon? The guy who pushed for large-scale integration of southern schools? In the fall of 1968, 68 percent of black children in the South were attending all-black schools. By 1974, that number had fallen to 8 percent. But in your view Nixon won the south by using a 'racist strategy'??

Is that your claim? That Republicans only won in the south by offering MORE racism than the Democrats?

Wow... just wow. I'm quoting this post for sheer lunacy.

You have the RNC Chair apologizing to black people for exploiting racial polarization for political gain, and you think that's not an admission of racist campaigns.

I'll say it again... just wow. You have to be paid for this, because there's no way any rational person can engage in doublethink this severe.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Read this article and explain it away please


West Virginia: Country's Most Racist Voters
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-k-wilson/west-virginia-countrys-mo_b_101651.html

Democrats dominate West Virginia politics.
Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Auditor, Treasurer, Agriculture Commissioner and both Senators are Democrat.

That is EVERY state wide elected office.

The most racist state in the country, according Huffington Post, and completely controlled by Democrats...

Hey Projo, I wasn't talking about you run of the mill weak puke racists like Spidey07, I was talking about the KKK
 
Last edited:

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
I think people like being lied to and black people are just too easily brainwashed by a political party that tells them that the white man has abused him and that they are just all victims. It is called apathy. Black people are not the only people beaten down by society, but that is what they think!
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
I think people like being lied to and black people are just too easily brainwashed by a political party that tells them that the white man has abused him and that they are just all victims. It is called apathy. Black people are not the only people beaten down by society, but that is what they think!

That's pretty pathetic. Some of that exists, but the party differences are quite real that you pretend are not.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Wow... just wow. I'm quoting this post for sheer lunacy.

You have the RNC Chair apologizing to black people for exploiting racial polarization for political gain, and you think that's not an admission of racist campaigns.

I'll say it again... just wow. You have to be paid for this, because there's no way any rational person can engage in doublethink this severe.
No I don't think that 'exploiting racial polarization' is the same as running a racist campaign.

If the campaign was racist then find me evidence of the racism.

You forget that Democrats kept winning the local and state elections after the civil rights act was passed. Nothing changed on the local level. The same racist Democrats that were in power in 1964 were in power in 1966 and 68 etc etc.

The only difference was in the Presidential elections where the Republicans started winning southern states. So explain to me how Goldwater and Nixon made an appeal to the southern voters via racism.

What policies of theirs were racist?

It is just idiocy on your behalf. Everything that was bad or racist that happened in the south happened due to Democrats. And you guys completely gloss over and ignore that and latch on to this idea that all the racist Democrats left the party and became Republicans when there is nothing to back up the claim.

If all the racist Democrats became Republican then why did it take 30 years for the GOP to win a majority of house seats in the south?

Why has Arkansas only had 3 Republican governors since 1874?
Why weren't there ANY Republican governors in Alabama until 1987?
Why did it take until 2003 for there to be a Republican governor in Georgia?
Louisiana, first Republican governor won office in 1980.
Mississippi, 1992.
North Carolina, 1973.
South Carolina, 1975
Tennessee, 1971.
Texas, 1979.
Virginia, 1970.
West Virginia 1969.

That is EVERY southern state and in EVERY ONE of them the Democrats were in control before AND after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed. And in EVERY ONE of them the Democrats won the governors race that occurred after the civil rights act. And in most cases the Democrats controlled the state for a decade or more after the civil rights act were passed.

All the white racists were Democrats before the civil rights act and they were Democrats after the civil rights act. Every leading racist Democrat died a Democrat, except Thurmond. There was NO mass exodus from the Democratic party after the civil rights bill passed. The only thing that changed was in national elections, at every other level the white racists kept voting for Democrats.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Hey Projo, I wasn't talking about you run of the mill weak puke racists like Spidey07, I was talking about the KKK
Hey... the facts are right in front of as reported by the Huffington Post.

The two most racist states in the country by voting habit are West Va and Arkansas and BOTH are completely dominated by Democrats.
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
Now if you could please show where there's a bunch of black republicans that are running and not being elected ...kind of hard to "represent their black constituency" when they aren't putting up candidates. Of course. Then again, I thought blacks were Americans too, so anyone in the House is representing them as their constituency.

A few years ago a black guy ran for governor of Ohio. But, many blacks in Ohio called him a traitor or something retarded because he was a Republican not a Democrat and voted for the white guy instead o_O

Everyone talks about how bad racism is and how it needs ended, and I agree. But it sure is hard to end it when many people on the other end are racists themselves and hate on those who try to do anything about it.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
A few years ago a black guy ran for governor of Ohio. But, many blacks in Ohio called him a traitor or something retarded because he was a Republican not a Democrat and voted for the white guy instead o_O

Everyone talks about how bad racism is and how it needs ended, and I agree. But it sure is hard to end it when many people on the other end are racists themselves and hate on those who try to do anything about it.

You're calling blacks who vote against a black Republican racist?

Wrong. You don't even know what racism is.

Would gays 'have to vote for a gay candidate' who was a Republican with anti-gay policies, wanting a constitutional amendment against gay marriage and sodomy?

Members of groups can sometimes gain for themselves by 'selling out'.

Members of the group can disagree with the rest of the group honestly; if they don't convince the group they're right, they face opposition from the group.

Imagine the slave south had found a black person who would say 'slavery is good for blacks and should be defended'. Would blacks have to support him?
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Except when they were passing Jim Crow laws or enforcing segregation or creating 'separate but equal or passing voter taxes to keep blacks from voting etc etc etc.


Maybe you should have amended your statement to reflect the truth a little better. National Democrats have done a lot to help blacks, but local southern Democrats have an awful track record

they still push separate but equal and for some reason being against it makes you a "racist".
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,665
54,640
136
No I don't think that 'exploiting racial polarization' is the same as running a racist campaign.

If the campaign was racist then find me evidence of the racism.

You forget that Democrats kept winning the local and state elections after the civil rights act was passed. Nothing changed on the local level. The same racist Democrats that were in power in 1964 were in power in 1966 and 68 etc etc.

The only difference was in the Presidential elections where the Republicans started winning southern states. So explain to me how Goldwater and Nixon made an appeal to the southern voters via racism.

What policies of theirs were racist?

It is just idiocy on your behalf. Everything that was bad or racist that happened in the south happened due to Democrats. And you guys completely gloss over and ignore that and latch on to this idea that all the racist Democrats left the party and became Republicans when there is nothing to back up the claim.

If all the racist Democrats became Republican then why did it take 30 years for the GOP to win a majority of house seats in the south?

Why has Arkansas only had 3 Republican governors since 1874?
Why weren't there ANY Republican governors in Alabama until 1987?
Why did it take until 2003 for there to be a Republican governor in Georgia?
Louisiana, first Republican governor won office in 1980.
Mississippi, 1992.
North Carolina, 1973.
South Carolina, 1975
Tennessee, 1971.
Texas, 1979.
Virginia, 1970.
West Virginia 1969.

That is EVERY southern state and in EVERY ONE of them the Democrats were in control before AND after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed. And in EVERY ONE of them the Democrats won the governors race that occurred after the civil rights act. And in most cases the Democrats controlled the state for a decade or more after the civil rights act were passed.

All the white racists were Democrats before the civil rights act and they were Democrats after the civil rights act. Every leading racist Democrat died a Democrat, except Thurmond. There was NO mass exodus from the Democratic party after the civil rights bill passed. The only thing that changed was in national elections, at every other level the white racists kept voting for Democrats.

Hey look, this is exactly like the other thread here where you were owned and then took to dancing in order to try and shift the argument towards one where you thought you could win.

This discussion had nothing to do with whether or not Democrats continued to win elections in the South after 1964. Any person with even a passing understanding of politics could easily see why that would happen through incumbency effects, patronage schemes, socialization, etc. If you want to have that discussion that's fine, but not in this thread.

If you don't believe that exploiting racial polarization is the same as running a racist campaign, then please explain to us all how exactly someone would 'exploit racial polarization' without engaging in activities that were racist. There's literally no sane way to interpret that other than an admission of racist campaigning.

Are you really this deluded? Things are NEVER this clear in politics. Parties always try to hedge things, deny uncomfortable facts, etc. This is one of the few cases I can remember where a party came straight out and admitted that it fucked up. Instead of viewing this as admirable, you try to pick up the flag of denial and carry on. You're embarrassing yourself.