pcslookout
Lifer
Let's revisit this. Why does the administration being black make the rule fair?
Bingo. I am so glad people see the real truth.
Let's revisit this. Why does the administration being black make the rule fair?
His original point was that white people wouldn't recognize dreads (possible) and might think she had them when she didn't, whereas most black people know what dreads look like and would make the correct call.
That's the thing- it's NOT a crappy school. It may have been what she needed to succeed in life.
Yes, I totally see the connection between mandated hair styles and succeeding in life.
I love the usual excuses that are trotted out to justify pointless rules that suit someone's view of an ordered universe:
"So she won't be a distraction" - yeah, I can see it now, all the kids in the classroom have their heads craned to see her haircut because it's like the hypno-toad. She might get mocked at school for it (just like some kids get mocked for any reason that the other kids want to pick that are perfectly within the school's rules), or the other kids might think it is cool.
"Because kids need to learn some discipline" - discipline and conformity only have something in common if the topic is regarding dumb animals. You send kids to school because you want them to learn what they need to succeed in the career that they choose. There are a lot of careers out there that don't consider conformity to be a number one priority. While society does need a load of people who are ideally suited to being call centre staff and other such 'drone' jobs, is that what you would hope for for your child, or would you prefer them to think for themselves? Freedom of expression and generation of self-identity is all part and parcel of that.
The funny thing is that I've never heard anyone say regarding some no-good scumbag that they probably had a "silly hairdo" as a kid or that if their parents had been more strict with regard to that person's hairdo when they were a kid that they wouldn't have turned out the way they did. But apparently strict rules regarding haircuts are so important that it's worth turning a kid away.
I can just imagine today's high flyers taking part in an informative announcement, "Thank YOU conformist haircut for helping make me the success I am today!".
Yes, I totally see the connection between mandated hair styles and succeeding in life.
On the other hand, the ability to follow arbitrary rules you don't necessarily agree with is a useful life skill.
I made that point already, but the point of a school is not to decide what career a kid ends up pursuing.(Many places in the real world don't care about 'stifling your creativity')
Kids need to learn a sense of law and order, cause and consequence, and the reasons for such things.
I made that point already, but the point of a school is not to decide what career a kid chooses.
Seems like this was a good lesson was imparted here
Cause: don't follow rules
Consequence: leave school
hyperbole much?
learning to follow the rules doesn't limit your career choices, it expands them
Seems like this was a good lesson was imparted here
Cause: don't follow rules
Consequence: leave school
I'm not sure you know the meaning of hyperbole, or perhaps you didn't understand the point I was making.hyperbole much?
I think the points I've made cover that point already, so it doesn't really add any credence to your argument.learning to follow the rules doesn't limit your career choices, it expands them
Nope, it's not a complex hair style, but she puts work into that.
Also how the fuck can the school have a stupid rule like that when they have a teacher with this hair?
![]()
That's distracting as all fuck, so they're not okay with a student having well taken care of dreds. But apparently a teacher looking like he got out of bed and said "fuck it!" and went to school without combing it's fine. And since that pic was obviously taken on picture day, I can only assume that might actually be a step up from his normal doo.
So much drama over a hair style!!!!
Stupid parents.
I highly disagree with that.
You said that many places don't care about stifling creativity.
schools should be providing the knowledge that is generally required as well as specifically required.
How is it part of a school's remit to stifle the pursuit of knowledge and experience?
thug
did you not notice the 'quotes' around 'stifling your creativity'?
head knowledge is one part of a school's job... but behavior training is another part. Learning to follow rules, learning how to learn, learning to think, learning how to deal with deadlines, learning acceptable rules of behavior, these are all important too.
I think it's appropriate to line those two quotes up together, because I fail to see how mandating haircuts achieves what you're pointing out here, unless an objective is that you don't want students to think and understand.Remind me again how rules about hair styles do that.
Yes, I totally see the connection between mandated hair styles and succeeding in life.
I love the usual excuses that are trotted out to justify pointless rules that suit someone's view of an ordered universe:
"So she won't be a distraction" - yeah, I can see it now, all the kids in the classroom have their heads craned to see her haircut because it's like the hypno-toad. She might get mocked at school for it (just like some kids get mocked for any reason that the other kids want to pick that are perfectly within the school's rules), or the other kids might think it is cool.
"Because kids need to learn some discipline" - discipline and conformity only have something in common if the topic is regarding dumb animals. You send kids to school because you want them to learn what they need to succeed in the career that they choose. There are a lot of careers out there that don't consider conformity to be a number one priority. While society does need a load of people who are ideally suited to being call centre staff and other such 'drone' jobs, is that what you would hope for for your child, or would you prefer them to think for themselves? Freedom of expression and generation of self-identity is all part and parcel of that.
The funny thing is that I've never heard anyone say regarding some no-good scumbag that they probably had a "silly hairdo" as a kid or that if their parents had been more strict with regard to that person's hairdo when they were a kid that they wouldn't have turned out the way they did. But apparently strict rules regarding haircuts are so important that it's worth turning a kid away.
I can just imagine today's high flyers taking part in an informative announcement, "Thank YOU conformist haircut for helping make me the success I am today!".
LOL at taking things out of context.
P&N levels of it.
Fine, so you were wasting time with pointless comments.
I think it's appropriate to line those two quotes up together, because I fail to see how mandating haircuts achieves what you're pointing out here, unless an objective is that you don't want students to think and understand.
What do you want from people as part of a society, a bunch of mindless drones / consumers, or people who can think their own thoughts and express themselves properly?
No, I'm not saying that allowing students the haircuts they want to have will stop them being mindless drones or consumers
but learning to accept all rules without question is the sort of mentality one ought to look for in a herd.
The people your offending shows your true colors.
Really? I somewhat doubt that there's any room for questioning such a silly rule as far as the school is concerned. It sounds to me like a case of "follow our rules or find another school". Do you really think that if a parent questions this rule that the school won't trot out the same silly excuses for such a rule as I pointed out in the first place with the same sorts of half-arsed justifications like "stupid rules help instil discipline"?you're confusing 'questioning' and 'following'