Whoa! New type of space drive discovered

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,754
16,093
146
The TLDR from the link above.

They tested the thruster at:
  • 40, 60, & 80W in the forward direction
  • 40, 60, & 80W in the reverse direction
  • 80W in the null direction

The tests showed two signals. One that appeared to be thermal and another that appeared to be thrust.

They found thrust in the forward direction of ~1.2mN/kw
They found thrust in the reverse direction of ~1.2mN/kw
(Hall effect plasma thrusters are ~60mn/kw, laser and solar sails are two orders of magnitude lower than this thruster)

In the null direction they only saw the thermal effects. The signal was significantly different than either the forward or reverse.

They calculated the uncertainty due to thermal, electric, mechanical, sensor error, @
& magnetic effects to be about +6uN absolute. (Absolute thrust measurements were 40-119uN for comparison)

Test was done for proof of concept not to optimize thrust/kw.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
I would love to see a test that really scales up the power, like in the megawatt range at the very least. Anyone smarter than me know if it's possible with the current engine being tested? What would be the limiting factor to how much juice you could pump into it?
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,806
4,788
75
Cool. Will this thing be ready to get us off the planet before tomorrow ends?
I don't think it's ever getting us off the planet. That still needs something faster like a rocket. It might get us to Mars though.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,794
16,066
136
ever say never. we have no concept of how this may scale or be honed yet.
 

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,653
3,610
136
We're not even sure how it works. When they figure out what exactly is happening and it's optimized you might get an extra order of magnitude or more of power out of it. And even if you don't, you're talking continuous thrust. So over a period of weeks or months even at low power you're going to be hauling ass.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,754
16,093
146
ever say never. we have no concept of how this may scale or be honed yet.

We're not even sure how it works. When they figure out what exactly is happening and it's optimized you might get an extra order of magnitude or more of power out of it. And even if you don't, you're talking continuous thrust. So over a period of weeks or months even at low power you're going to be hauling ass.

Yes. It may be this thruster is currently like slapping at the water on a raft. You go a little ways in one direction. Once we understand it maybe we can get to "oars" and "propellers".
 

ImpulsE69

Lifer
Jan 8, 2010
14,946
1,077
126
It works by magik. Mind you magik, not magic. BIG difference, i mean really...magic isn't even real.
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
The TLDR from the link above.

They tested the thruster at:
  • 40, 60, & 80W in the forward direction
  • 40, 60, & 80W in the reverse direction
  • 80W in the null direction

The tests showed two signals. One that appeared to be thermal and another that appeared to be thrust.

They found thrust in the forward direction of ~1.2mN/kw
They found thrust in the reverse direction of ~1.2mN/kw
(Hall effect plasma thrusters are ~60mn/kw, laser and solar sails are two orders of magnitude lower than this thruster)

In the null direction they only saw the thermal effects. The signal was significantly different than either the forward or reverse.

They calculated the uncertainty due to thermal, electric, mechanical, sensor error, @
& magnetic effects to be about +6uN absolute. (Absolute thrust measurements were 40-119uN for comparison)

Test was done for proof of concept not to optimize thrust/kw.
It's official now.
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.B36120
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thebobo

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Real easy test, take one up, toss it out the airlock, and turn it on.
 

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
12,066
1,158
126
Real easy test, take one up, toss it out the airlock, and turn it on.
Not really. With only mircoNewtons of thrust, you would run out of power before you could get good results. Larger batteries would mean more mass to accelerate.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
We're not even sure how it works. When they figure out what exactly is happening and it's optimized you might get an extra order of magnitude or more of power out of it. And even if you don't, you're talking continuous thrust. So over a period of weeks or months even at low power you're going to be hauling ass.
Agreed. Understanding how something works is almost always more useful than the thing itself.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,754
16,093
146
Ars still isn't impressed, plus they have the best title graphic of all time


I read the wired link

that explanation is BS

All of the people listed are quacks. Getting more quacks together doesn't 'confirm' anything.

Until it goes through peer review from a reputable source it rises to the level of nothing.

Lab and design errors are legion and infinitely more likely than discovering a whole new physics

Then why hasn't it been published in a reputable journal?

So it may still be experimental error but how you feeling about it being nothing by some quacks after going through peer review. ;)
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136

tynopik

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2004
5,245
500
126
So it may still be experimental error but how you feeling about it being nothing by some quacks after going through peer review. ;)

it's not clear what peer review they have gotten through, but they have managed to achieve the minimum required to be worth poking at it

that said, quacks get published all the time
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
Real easy test, take one up, toss it out the airlock, and turn it on.
Not really. With only mircoNewtons of thrust, you would run out of power before you could get good results. Larger batteries would mean more mass to accelerate.

Didn't I read someone is putting a small one in an orbit that lasts like 100 days and they'll see if the thrust keeps it in orbit longer?

I could be wildly wrong.
 

Franz316

Golden Member
Sep 12, 2000
1,028
556
136
I would love to see a test that really scales up the power, like in the megawatt range at the very least. Anyone smarter than me know if it's possible with the current engine being tested? What would be the limiting factor to how much juice you could pump into it?
Yeah I'm curious about this as well. Why not just put 100kw into it and remove all doubt of whether it is producing thrust or not?
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Didn't I read someone is putting a small one in an orbit that lasts like 100 days and they'll see if the thrust keeps it in orbit longer?

I could be wildly wrong.

Yes, there are plans to send one up in a cubesat sometime relatively soon. Don't remember who exactly is doing it but I did read it was being planned and was funded.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136

I like that they are cautiously analyzing instead of just writing it off like Thunderf00t did.

The point is, we're trying to determine if the effect is real, even if we don't fully understand how it works.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,754
16,093
146

I like that they are cautiously analyzing instead of just writing it off like Thunderf00t did.

The point is, we're trying to determine if the effect is real, even if we don't fully understand how it works.

I really like Spacetime. This was a good episode as well. Very fair and balanced.