Who won the GOP debate? poll results inside

[SandEagle]

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57323832/who-won-the-gop-debate-take-our-poll/


hurry up and view it before it gets taken down. its RON PAUL. YAY! let's see the media pick up on that.

 

[Lemon law]

Vote early and often, rest assured the Paul Bots do.

This poll is now closed, but wait until the next GOP debate phone in poll. Paul Bots skew every phone in poll on the planet because they come prepared.

Yet come actual political GOP primaries, Ron Paul is lucky to poll even 4%.

Yawn.

But do not give up hope Paul Bots, even if Ron Paul dies of old age soon, there is always Rand Paul to keep hope alive.

 

[UberNeuman]

Ron Paul - the mouth that suckled the teat of government for so many years....

\wonders how the "Paulies" reconcile the war of the two Pauls....

 

[MacLeod1592]

Paul has some good ideas but just way too weak on national defense and national security. We'd be overrun by Canada within his first year!

 

[yhelothar]

Paul has some good ideas but just way too weak on national defense and national security. We'd be overrun by Canada within his first year!

I know right? That's why he receives more donations from the military than all the other candidates combined.

 

[MacLeod1592]

So? He's campaigning on a platform of never using the military ever for anything. Hell, that sounds good to most military families. Unfortunately decisions like not using enhanced interrogation techniques, getting us out of every country in the world completely and admitting that he would NOT have killed Bin Laden had he been in charge, make it impossible for me to vote for him. Too many countries and groups of well funded terrorists out there want to kill us. Ignoring them is a dangerous way to deal with them.

 

[WelshBloke]

Who won the GOP debate?

I'm gonna say the Democrats.

 

[MacLeod1592]

I think Gingrich does the best job in these debates, followed closely by Romney but unfortunately Gingrich isnt likable enough to get elected IMO. I personally like his no bullshit approach but there are way too many people in this country that vote for a living so theyll need somebody that seems sweet and nice and will take care of them.

 

[UberNeuman]

I think Gingrich does the best job in these debates, followed closely by Romney but unfortunately Gingrich isnt likable enough to get elected IMO. I personally like his no bullshit approach but there are way too many people in this country that vote for a living so theyll need somebody that seems sweet and nice and will take care of them.

because he's full of bullshit, always has been...

\do you like bullshit - if you do - Gingrich's got it....
\\eat it up...

 

[Nemesis 1]

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_...s-ron-paul-moves-to-top-tier/?tag=re1.channel

 

[DucatiMonster696]

Vote early and often, rest assured the Paul Bots do.

This poll is now closed, but wait until the next GOP debate phone in poll. Paul Bots skew every phone in poll on the planet because they come prepared.

Yet come actual political GOP primaries, Ron Paul is lucky to poll even 4%.

Yawn.

But do not give up hope Paul Bots, even if Ron Paul dies of old age soon, there is always Rand Paul to keep hope alive.

All this passion and hatred when we already know you are voting for Obama.

A.K.A The Establishment Guy. Approved and payed for by Goldman Sachs the company you love to hate but hate to love when they help fund "Your Guy's" campaign.

 

[UberNeuman]

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_...s-ron-paul-moves-to-top-tier/?tag=re1.channel

It must bug you at some point to know that he's been sucking off a system that you decry...

 

[Ausm]

Ron Paul - the mouth that suckled the teat of government for so many years....

\wonders how the "Paulies" reconcile the war of the two Pauls....

Typical Republican do what I say and not as I do....

 

[yhelothar]

So? He's campaigning on a platform of never using the military ever for anything. Hell, that sounds good to most military families. Unfortunately decisions like not using enhanced interrogation techniques, getting us out of every country in the world completely and admitting that he would NOT have killed Bin Laden had he been in charge, make it impossible for me to vote for him. Too many countries and groups of well funded terrorists out there want to kill us. Ignoring them is a dangerous way to deal with them.

So we need to bomb the shit out of them huh?

He's campaigning for taking our bases out of other countries and stop imposing ourselves onto others, stop trying to be the world's policeman. This is the prime reason terrorists hate us. It's not exactly a mystery here. If other countries put bases in our country and try to impose themselves on us, we'd hate them too.

 

[MacLeod1592]

Feel free to point out where I said we should bomb anybody.

What we should do is take terrorism seriously as its not just a bunch of backwoods hillbillies running around talking about overthrowing the government. These are countries and governments with hundreds of millions of dollars in funding that want nothing but Americans dead. Russia and China are involved in other countries as well if not more than we are but you see no terrorist attacks on them because they would just nuke them back into the stone age. They know we wont so they fuck with us.

And I like having military bases in these areas. When you have countries that hate us and are sworn to Allah to wipe us off the map, just leaving them alone is not only a bad idea but also very naive and dangerous. If we pull all our forces out of the middle east, you think all these state sponsored terrorist groups would just say "OK, we're happy now. Live long and prosper?" Everybody thought it was a good idea to leave Hitler alone back in the 30's. How'd that work out?

And I totally, TOTALLY reject as utter bullshit the idea that we are responsible for terrorism. As much as it pains the left wing, America and her allies are the GOOD GUYS. Us along with our allies are responsible for increasing the overall global quality of life in the past century more than in all of history. We along with our allies drive the world economy, we feed the world, we protect weaker countries, when a natural disaster hits we are the first ones there to help.

 

[xj0hnx]

Feel free to point out where I said we should bomb anybody.

What we should do is take terrorism seriously as its not just a bunch of backwoods hillbillies running around talking about overthrowing the government. These are countries and governments with hundreds of millions of dollars in funding that want nothing but Americans dead.

It's always amazing seeing people so scared of the terrorist bogeyman. You don't need "hundreds of millions of dollars", or government involvement, you need the will. One could cause an attack so devastating that it would shock the world with a couple hundred bucks, yet where are the attacks? Why haven't any schools/school buses blown up? or crowded shopping malls? Or packed airport/bus/train terminals? It doesn't take intricate plots, or massive funding from Middle East loonies, our own government has done more to continue the spread of fear in the American people than anyone in the Middle East has.

And I totally, TOTALLY reject as utter bullshit the idea that we are responsible for terrorism. As much as it pains the left wing, America and her allies are the GOOD GUYS. Us along with our allies are responsible for increasing the overall global quality of life in the past century more than in all of history. We along with our allies drive the world economy, we feed the world, we protect weaker countries, when a natural disaster hits we are the first ones there to help.

Than you truly do not understand why there is a terrorist threat at all. Being the "good guys", doesn't mean shit. When the "good guys" topple governments, and place puppet dictators, invade countries under false pretenses it kind of builds a little resentment.

 

[soundforbjt]

^^^ This...I totally agree.

 

[fskimospy]

And this is why Ron Paul will be elected president of the internet.

 

[Craig234]

And I totally, TOTALLY reject as utter bullshit the idea that we are responsible for terrorism. As much as it pains the left wing, America and her allies are the GOOD GUYS.

Ah, the voice of ignorance. Actually in a lot of ways, we are 'the good guys', but you don't understand how we are and especially the many ways we're not. 'Ignorance is bliss'.

 

[Craig234]

All this passion and hatred when we already know you are voting for Obama.

A.K.A The Establishment Guy. Approved and payed for by Goldman Sachs the company you love to hate but hate to love when they help fund "Your Guy's" campaign.

Let's be clear about a few things.

Progressives do NOT like Obama's being the #1 recipient of Goldman Sachs' donations in 2008. Preferring him to far worse doesn't mean liking that about him.

Progressives are opposed to his being far too much to the right and the corporatocracy. Unfortunately, the current system gives far too much power to the corrupt interests.

Obama isn't 'the Establishment Guy' while the modern Republicans are here. He might be 'AN establishment guy', but the Republicans are mostly much more so than him.

This election cycle, Wall Street has shifted from Obama, cutting his donations, to Romney, who will badly sell out the American people to Wall Street.

Funny, you have a lot to say to attack Obama for being 'too Wall Street' but not so much about Romney who is far more 'Wall Street'. Which is it, are you for or against them?

 

[PingviN]

Russia and China are involved in other countries as well if not more than we are but you see no terrorist attacks on them because they would just nuke them back into the stone age. They know we wont so they fuck with us.

Russia not having terrorist attacks? You really that dumb? Islamic terrorism is a bigger problem in Russia than it is in the states.

The US still is the only nation ever having used nukes as an act of war. You're also the most warmongering of nations. Obviously, only a retard would argue that offense is the best defense when it comes to terrorism.

Maybe someone with a rational foreign policy would be to your benefit, not that most ignorant, paranoid right-nuts would ever be able to grasp that.

And I totally, TOTALLY reject as utter bullshit the idea that we are responsible for terrorism. As much as it pains the left wing, America and her allies are the GOOD GUYS. Us along with our allies are responsible for increasing the overall global quality of life in the past century more than in all of history. We along with our allies drive the world economy, we feed the world, we protect weaker countries, when a natural disaster hits we are the first ones there to help.

lol, guess life is easier living in denial, aint it?

 

[Londo_Jowo]

And this is why Ron Paul will be elected president of the internet.

Will Antichrist420 be his VP?

 

[MacLeod1592]

It's always amazing seeing people so scared of the terrorist bogeyman. You don't need "hundreds of millions of dollars", or government involvement, you need the will. One could cause an attack so devastating that it would shock the world with a couple hundred bucks, yet where are the attacks? Why haven't any schools/school buses blown up? or crowded shopping malls? Or packed airport/bus/train terminals? It doesn't take intricate plots, or massive funding from Middle East loonies, our own government has done more to continue the spread of fear in the American people than anyone in the Middle East has.

There is plenty of that happening in places like Israel. The reason why there haven't been any shopping malls blown up is because we're taking security seriously. There have been several plots thwarted by law enforecment like the Time Square bomber not too long ago. Just because we've stopped a lot of attacks doesn't mean there is no danger and not something we need to take seriously.

Than you truly do not understand why there is a terrorist threat at all. Being the "good guys", doesn't mean shit. When the "good guys" topple governments, and place puppet dictators, invade countries under false pretenses it kind of builds a little resentment.

What governments have we toppled and put in puppet dictators. You can't say Iraq because that happened after 9/11 and the world is a better place that we did.

Its people like you that just need to be defeated. There is no point in trying to compromise or work with anybody that thinks America is the problem and not the people trying to kill us.

 

[soundforbjt]

What governments have we toppled and put in puppet dictators. You can't say Iraq because that happened after 9/11 and the world is a better place that we did.

See Shah of Iran

Its people like you that just need to be defeated. There is no point in trying to compromise or work with anybody that thinks America is the problem and not the people trying to kill us.

Let me guess, you think they hate us for our freedom. Bet you voted for Bush twice.

See inserts.

 

[MacLeod1592]

Russia not having terrorist attacks? You really that dumb? Islamic terrorism is a bigger problem in Russia than it is in the states.

The US still is the only nation ever having used nukes as an act of war. You're also the most warmongering of nations. Obviously, only a retard would argue that offense is the best defense when it comes to terrorism.

Maybe someone with a rational foreign policy would be to your benefit, not that most ignorant, paranoid right-nuts would ever be able to grasp that.




lol, guess life is easier living in denial, aint it?

Really? That's all you can come up with? "Well your country sucks because you're a bunch of big fat meanies and you're too dumb to see how much you suck".

Brilliant. I'm just thankful people like you aren't in charge.