Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Unfortunately all the fvcktards in this country will see "80" and not have dual-speedos (or even any idea that the signs aren't in miles per hour any more) and push their cars to twice the speed limit![]()
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
On philosophical principal I dislike the metric system. It was and is a fix for something that is not broken. Just because people are too lazy to do proper conversions with the Imperial system they had to change things. Thant and Fahrenheit is more precise than Centegrade (180 degrees between boiling and freezing versus 100 for Centigrade).
Of course, there's nothing wrong inherently with the metric system. It's just kinda pointless.
ZV
Originally posted by: fisher
none of those really sound french tho. ass.
You're committing the amateur mistake of confusing accuracy with precision.Originally posted by: marcello
Wrong. Fahrenheit and Centigrade are equally accurate. Any mathmetician can tell you that. There are the same amount of numbers in between 0 and 100 and 0 and 180. Infinity. Hence, they are equally accurate.Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
On philosophical principal I dislike the metric system. It was and is a fix for something that is not broken. Just because people are too lazy to do proper conversions with the Imperial system they had to change things. Thant and Fahrenheit is more precise than Centegrade (180 degrees between boiling and freezing versus 100 for Centigrade).
Of course, there's nothing wrong inherently with the metric system. It's just kinda pointless.
ZV
How is it more precise?Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
You're committing the amateur mistake of confusing accuracy with precision.Originally posted by: marcello
Wrong. Fahrenheit and Centigrade are equally accurate. Any mathmetician can tell you that. There are the same amount of numbers in between 0 and 100 and 0 and 180. Infinity. Hence, they are equally accurate.Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
On philosophical principal I dislike the metric system. It was and is a fix for something that is not broken. Just because people are too lazy to do proper conversions with the Imperial system they had to change things. Thant and Fahrenheit is more precise than Centegrade (180 degrees between boiling and freezing versus 100 for Centigrade).
Of course, there's nothing wrong inherently with the metric system. It's just kinda pointless.
ZV
Fahrenheit and Centigrade are indeed identially accurate, but Fahrenheit is more _precise_.
ZV
Originally posted by: magomago
I'm used to both. Although temperature I prefer fareignheght because...that is how I was taughtI can't gauge "living" temperature in Celcius as an in Fareigntheight. But oddly enough I always think of water boiling at 100 degrees and 0 Degrees...never -32 and 212. Though when I'm doing anything else related to temperature beyond seeing the forecast I prefer Celcius. But weights I can think of both, same with distance....
Why are "unit" and "temperature" capitalized?Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: magomago
I'm used to both. Although temperature I prefer fareignheght because...that is how I was taughtI can't gauge "living" temperature in Celcius as an in Fareigntheight. But oddly enough I always think of water boiling at 100 degrees and 0 Degrees...never -32 and 212. Though when I'm doing anything else related to temperature beyond seeing the forecast I prefer Celcius. But weights I can think of both, same with distance....
The SI Unit of Temperature is the Kelvin. And the freezing point of water is 32F, not -32F.
Edit: Oh God I missed that bastardization -- it's "Fahrenheit", not whatever you have there. And umm, "Celsius".
Originally posted by: Howard
Why are "unit" and "temperature" capitalized?Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: magomago
I'm used to both. Although temperature I prefer fareignheght because...that is how I was taughtI can't gauge "living" temperature in Celcius as an in Fareigntheight. But oddly enough I always think of water boiling at 100 degrees and 0 Degrees...never -32 and 212. Though when I'm doing anything else related to temperature beyond seeing the forecast I prefer Celcius. But weights I can think of both, same with distance....
The SI Unit of Temperature is the Kelvin. And the freezing point of water is 32F, not -32F.
Edit: Oh God I missed that bastardization -- it's "Fahrenheit", not whatever you have there. And umm, "Celsius".
EDIT: 32°F
Originally posted by: Howard
How is it more precise?Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
You're committing the amateur mistake of confusing accuracy with precision.Originally posted by: marcello
Wrong. Fahrenheit and Centigrade are equally accurate. Any mathmetician can tell you that. There are the same amount of numbers in between 0 and 100 and 0 and 180. Infinity. Hence, they are equally accurate.Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
On philosophical principal I dislike the metric system. It was and is a fix for something that is not broken. Just because people are too lazy to do proper conversions with the Imperial system they had to change things. Thant and Fahrenheit is more precise than Centegrade (180 degrees between boiling and freezing versus 100 for Centigrade).
Of course, there's nothing wrong inherently with the metric system. It's just kinda pointless.
ZV
Fahrenheit and Centigrade are indeed identially accurate, but Fahrenheit is more _precise_.
ZV![]()
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Of course, there's nothing wrong inherently with the metric system. It's just kinda pointless.
ZV
Originally posted by: Lonyo
I use inches, feet, miles, meters, centimeters, pounds, stone and kilograms :/
14 poundsOriginally posted by: JustAnAverageGuy
Originally posted by: Lonyo
I use inches, feet, miles, meters, centimeters, pounds, stone and kilograms :/
What's a stone?![]()
My belief, as an American, is that if I have to start understanding the metric system, then the terrorists have already won.
no, thats a rockOriginally posted by: Howard
14 poundsOriginally posted by: JustAnAverageGuy
Originally posted by: Lonyo
I use inches, feet, miles, meters, centimeters, pounds, stone and kilograms :/
What's a stone?![]()
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
You're committing the amateur mistake of confusing accuracy with precision.Originally posted by: marcello
Wrong. Fahrenheit and Centigrade are equally accurate. Any mathmetician can tell you that. There are the same amount of numbers in between 0 and 100 and 0 and 180. Infinity. Hence, they are equally accurate.Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
On philosophical principal I dislike the metric system. It was and is a fix for something that is not broken. Just because people are too lazy to do proper conversions with the Imperial system they had to change things. Thant and Fahrenheit is more precise than Centegrade (180 degrees between boiling and freezing versus 100 for Centigrade).
Of course, there's nothing wrong inherently with the metric system. It's just kinda pointless.
ZV
Fahrenheit and Centigrade are indeed identially accurate, but Fahrenheit is more _precise_.
ZV
