TerryMathews
Lifer
Thought so don't worry tho there is help out there for you.
He's my own personal Jesus. Someone to hear my prayers.*Someone who cares*
Thought so don't worry tho there is help out there for you.
I'm saying that some people analyze this sort of thing for a living and they might have thought about these issues more thoroughly than you have. You have already equated governmental debt to household debt, which shows me you don't understand how government debt works.
If your ideas are such common sense, surely some competent authority has advocated for them. I would just like to know which ones, what's the problem?
Explain how they're different. Both have to be paid in some fashion, even if it is interest only.
Do you think there's some magic government debt handshake where we don't really pay? Didn't work for Greece.
I was unaware that duration was a determining factor as to if something was blackmail or not.
Equating Greece and the US is also not a good comparison. Question, do you owe your debts in dollars or TerryMathewsBucks?
The debt ceiling is Congress's. If Obama wants to alter it and Boehner wants cuts in return that's not blackmail it's negotiation.
Also, here is a source advocating spending cuts. http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3856 There are more. Do your own Googling.
Again, you appear to believe that choosing not to destroy the global economy is somehow something that is a concession to Obama. This is not correct.
I did not ask for a source advocating spending cuts, foolish as they are. I asked for a source advocating default as less bad than raising the debt ceiling.
Why are they different?
I'm going to ignore your snide comment. Typical liberal, has to be condescending to anyone who doesn't agree with them. Just like Ole Joe.
So your position is that nothing should ever be bargained together? Debt ceiling separate from medicare separate from budget cuts etc?
No, I don't know how you could get that idea. My position is that threatening to cause a global economic catastrophe unless your demands are met is bad governance.
If you owe someone debt in money you can create by snapping your fingers it is very different than if you don't.
Do you have any clue how inflation works?
And you are aware that Greece also could "print money" correct?
You're saying demand. I'm saying 6 month negotiation.
Were the Republicans requiring policy changes to not cause a global financial crisis or not?
With the definitions you're using, there can never be negotiations. You understand that right?
Yes I know how inflation works.
No, Greece could not print money.
That makes no sense whatsoever. I don't care if people make demands, I only care if they elect to threaten global financial stability if those demands are not met. I've said this several times already.
You're saying demand. I'm saying 6 month negotiation.
Right. You're saying that because this "threatens global financial stability" that Boehner must agree to it without imposing other terms. Correct?
Quoted for self pwnage. Your article says that while Greece owns actual physical presses, it cannot actually create new euros in its own without external permission.
Seriously, that's embarrassing.
Yes. How many times do I need to say it? Choosing to threaten global financial stability in order to get your preferred fiscal policy is simply bad governance. Any politician engaging in it is doing a disservice to his country and should be ashamed of himself.
I guess we have different levels of faith in politicians?
Quoted for self pwnage. Your article says that while Greece owns actual physical presses, it cannot actually create new euros in its own without external permission.
Seriously, that's embarrassing.
There's no "pwnage" and you missed the point.
Greece can print drachmas. By many accounts the question of Greece leaving the Euro is 'when', not 'if''.
The article he linked is another rumor about Greece leaving.
Have at it with google, speculation on Greece's departure is rampant.
Fern