• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Who had the most influence in winning the World War II ?

H

hergehen

Senior member
Yes, the Allies and the "World" won ...

but my question is : Who had the most influence in winning the World War II ?

Please vote ...

I hope I got all choices covered 🙂


edit: oh man, forgot the POLL 🙁 🙁 🙁 ... so just reply with your answer 😉
 


<< I think this thread will turn into a flamefest 😉 >>



<- Puts a bottle of lighter fuel and some matches on the table 😛
 


<< Russians >>



LOL Czar Czar Czar.... How did I know you wouldn't pick the US? 😀

The US for Fighting on both Fronts with more fire and man power than anyone else.
 
Ummmm, this is possibly the mother of all pointless rhetorical questions. Especially without a poll....

Nevertheless, my answer is Hitler.

Second choice: Oppenheimer
 


<< Ummmm, this is possibly the mother of all pointless rhetorical questions. Especially without a poll....

Nevertheless, my answer is Hitler. >>




thats a good one but I'll stick to my answer 🙂
 
Objectively, I think the US had the most influence. The USSR did play an extremely signifigant roll, but only in the European Theater, and only with the material support of the US.
 
Definitely not France! Russian did lose 15 million men and pushed back the Germans, so I'd have to say them. But really, if Germany didn't have a two-front war, I'd be speaking to you in German right now 😉
 
America, we supplied the Russian tanks which allowed them to aid us, and you're ignoring the pacific which we pretty much did on our own. We also help the Brits take Africa and knock out Italy.

2/3 Axis Powers ain't bad.
 


<< It was Hitler. He tried to expand the war to far to fast. >>



100% agree... we're extremely lucky he pissed off Russia. It wasn't so much that Russia helped us by fighting with us, but they helped by not fighting AGAINST us. Let me know if that made sense 😛

CK
 


<< America, we supplied the Russian tanks which allowed them to aid us, and you're ignoring the pacific which we pretty much did on our own. We also help the Brits take Africa and knock out Italy.

2/3 Axis Powers ain't bad. >>




Now if you were looking at who was the most damaging influence on the Allies side, aside from France would be General Montgommery

Keep the flames burnin! 😀
 
I think it was France who had the most influence. They gave the Germans a false sense of security by letting the Nazis overrun their country. 😉
 


<< America, we supplied the Russian tanks ... >>



And fighter aircraft and medical supplies and Stalin tried like hell to stop the Russian People from finding it out. He had the medical and food supplies relabled....

Stalin did not support the US against Japan and even took American Airmen hostage for making emergency landings at Russian airfields. Stalin had no navy, no long range bombers and had no interest in helping the Allies. Everything he did was selfish and selfserving.

Hitler had the most influence as without him there would have been no war.

As far as the country that influenced the outcome.....The United States of America without question...

 
Who had the most influence in winning the World War II ?

Us Brits of course - gotta have at least one vote 🙂
 


<< Everyone knows it would've been a lopsided defeat without the support of the Canadian military. >>



Correct. It would have taken us a much shorter ammout of time if we weren't carrying the Canadians with us. 😉
 


<< It was Hitler. He tried to expand the war to far to fast. >>


That's my vote, at least for the European theater. Trying to blitzkrieg Russia in winter.... DOH!! 😉

amish
 
Gotta be the Germans. They opened another front, while they were fighting in to other areas, and that other front was Russia in the winter. Should've learned from Napoleon that it's a bad idea.
 
i believe it was because of some stupid strategic moves made b hitler...i guess it was inevitable that a guy who is screwed up in the head had to screw up. even if hitler did win the war, i dont think he could have retained control for any longer.
 
The Greeks. Well maybe not.

But their surprise stubborness against the invading Italians supposedly caused the Nazis to delay their attack on Russia for a couple of weeks so they could go down and help out their allies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top