Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
The problem with almost all of these threads is that people immediately ignore what is proposed and make attacks on Democrats and Republicans. Rather than debate the merits (or lack thereof), we bring up Bush and Communism and whatever.
This was badly planned and executed. If politicians cannot competently present cogent facts about what they propose I must ask myself how can they be trusted with such an important task as health care?
So we should do nothing?
We ought to deal with the reality at hand and work to understand just what needs to be done (and what needs to be left alone) and then do something.
If you had a large amount to invest, would you put all of into a stock or group of stocks and then decide what to do with it?
Or, if you were to enter into a binding business agreement, would you not want to understand the details and implications before signing? Would should you cry out against anyone if you did not use ordinary wisdom in such matters and it worked against you?
Likewise, rather than engage in spurious diversions, go after the meat of the matter.
If a plan brought to the light can withstand scrutiny it will sell itself. If not then it's better left to die.
We don't hold our leaders accountable. We either accept at face value what they say or automatically discount it like Rush. Either this is a good idea or not. The onus is those who say it's for the best not to attack whatever system is in place, but point to what can be demonstrated as fact and use that as a justification.
So far, we have heard how broken the current system and there needs to be health care for all, but what does that mean in practice? So far neither Obama nor the Dems have been able to do so, because they have legislated in advance of determining precisely what needs to be done and have a policy of transparency about it.