White? Dont teach here. Op Updated to address false 'racist' labal

[realibrad]

And you are still failing the reading comprehension.

I'm not going in circles anymore. You understood what the argument was about and now you don't again. Until you can prove you know where you are I am not going to chase your tail for you.

The statement he made, was what he thought the conclusion of the protesters would be, and not from his own beliefs.

You are thinking its other not understanding, but its you. I think everyone here understands that.

If not, someone please help me understand.

How can waggy say this

this "news" is silly. the school should tell them go pound sand. The teacher has the qualifications so he is able to teach it. it amazes me that people think the color of the skin matters

and you think he is saying the opposite?

 

[justoh]

So you're both wrong. Case settled.

 

[SpatiallyAware]

And you are still failing the reading comprehension.

I'm not going in circles anymore. You understood what the argument was about and now you don't again. Until you can prove you know where you are I am not going to chase your tail for you.

Thank god!

 

[dphantom]

The statement he made, was what he thought the conclusion of the protesters would be, and not from his own beliefs.

You are thinking its other not understanding, but its you. I think everyone here understands that.

If not, someone please help me understand.

How can waggy say this



and you think he is saying the opposite?

it is my understanding as well and quite clear to me.

 

[realibrad]

So you're both wrong. Case settled.

Who is wrong, who is right? I'm so confused.

You seem reasonable here, so please help me understand what I'm missing.

 

[dank69]

The statement he made, was what he thought the conclusion of the protesters would be, and not from his own beliefs.

You are thinking its other not understanding, but its you. I think everyone here understands that.

If not, someone please help me understand.

How can waggy say this



and you think he is saying the opposite?

With all due respect, Realibrad, fuck you. Here is what I wrote in post 211:

...

But, yet again you think I am saying that Waggy believes that:
Whites can't teach African studies
and
Blacks can't teach American History

Yet again, that is not what I am saying.

...

Yet even though I just told you that in black and white you are still asking me why I am saying the opposite of what I have been saying all along. You are going to have trouble convincing anyone reading this thread that you are not genuinely retarded.

 

[dphantom]

Thank god!

I do not think I would want him chasing my tail either.

 

[dank69]

So you're both wrong. Case settled.

Crayons. Crayons would be good for you.

 

[OutHouse]

holy shit dank, just stfu already.

 

[dank69]

holy shit dank, just stfu already.

Why? What about perfectly sound logical reasoning bothers you so much? Maybe you should explore your feelings for the answer.

 

[dphantom]

With all due respect, Realibrad, fuck you. Here is what I wrote in post 211:



Yet even though I just told you that in black and white you are still asking me why I am saying the opposite of what I have been saying all along. You are going to have trouble convincing anyone reading this thread that you are not genuinely retarded.

So in essence you are agreeing with waggy?

 

[justoh]

Who is wrong, who is right? I'm so confused.

You seem reasonable here, so please help me understand what I'm missing.

You're right that it's not necessarily what waggy believes, but wrong about what follows from the statements made by the protestor. He's right about that and wrong about what waggy believes. So you cancel each other out. We all win

 

[dank69]

So in essence you are agreeing with waggy?

I agree with Waggy's conclusion, that race has no bearing on ability to teach any subject, as I have written countless times in this thread. Why are you so bad at reading? Why do you have to ask me a question I have already answered over and over?

 

[dank69]

You're right that it's not necessarily what waggy believes, but wrong about what follows from the statements made by the protestor. He's right about that and wrong about what waggy believes. So you cancel each other out. We all win

The bolded is wrong.

 

[Retro Rob]

The statement he made, was what he thought the conclusion of the protesters would be, and not from his own beliefs.

This was my conclusion too.

dumb69.

 

[dank69]

This was my conclusion too.

dumb69.

Wow, mine too. I guess that makes us equally dumb. Amirite?

 

[realibrad]

You're right that it's not necessarily what waggy believes, but wrong about what follows from the statements made by the protestor. He's right about that and wrong about what waggy believes. So you cancel each other out. We all win

Lol we all win indeed.

Its almost time for lunch, and I am hungry. I think I got out of this what I wanted.

I wish we had a way of making notes that only I could see or create to remember situations like this. I feel like dank and I are on the same page about religion, but this was awful.

 

[justoh]

The bolded is wrong.

Sorry I'm so slow. Could you explain in lay terms why he must believe that blacks aren't a part of american history? If that's what it was. Can't remember

 

[dank69]

Sorry I'm so slow. Could you explain in lay terms why he must believe that blacks aren't a part of american history?

I already told you Waggy thinks the two statements are the same. He doesn't think they are right, but he thinks they are equal. Every time I tell you that he thinks the statements are equal, you retards for some reason think I am saying he thinks they are correct. Do you guys not understand that two statements can be equal while both are still incorrect? Am I speaking a foreign language here?

 

[justoh]

Why does thinking they're equal mean he believes them to be correct

 

[justoh]

I already told you Waggy thinks the two statements are the same. He doesn't think they are right, but he thinks they are equal. Every time I tell you that he thinks the statements are equal, you retards for some reason think I am saying he thinks they are correct. Do you guys not understand that two statements can be equal while both are still incorrect? Am I speaking a foreign language here?

How do we know he thinks they're equal. Equal how? Don't they mean different things?

 

[dank69]

Why does thinking they're equal mean he believes them to be correct

Holy fuckballs. It doesn't.

How do we know he thinks they're equal. Equal how? Don't they mean different things?

Because he needed a statement he thought was equal in order to extend the logic. The first equal example he could think of was firing black history teachers.

 

[Zaap]

*Slow clap* Amazing display of stupidity by dank.

But then, that's pretty much what the left has reduced racism to in the modern era, so it's fitting. Basically it's not about any actual racism, it's all about purposefully misunderstanding what someone says, creating your own racist meaning for it, emoting like a 2 year old to what you made up, then yelling "racist!!!" at the person.

And the dimshits that *constantly* do this wonder why they're called race-baiters.

 

[waggy]

*Slow clap* Amazing display of stupidity by dank.

But then, that's pretty much what the left has reduced racism to in the modern era, so it's fitting. Basically it's not about any actual racism, it's all about purposefully misunderstanding what someone says, creating your own racist meaning for it, emoting like a 2 year old to what you made up, then yelling "racist!!!" at the person.

And the dimshits that *constantly* do this wonder why they're called race-baiters.

/this

there is a reason i am not arguing with him. No matter what i say he will twist to fit his desire to continue to call me a racist.

why you guys continue to argue with him...

 

[dank69]

*Slow clap* Amazing display of stupidity by dank.

But then, that's pretty much what the left has reduced racism to in the modern era, so it's fitting. Basically it's not about any actual racism, it's all about purposefully misunderstanding what someone says, creating your own racist meaning for it, emoting like a 2 year old to what you made up, then yelling "racist!!!" at the person.

And the dimshits that *constantly* do this wonder why they're called race-baiters.

I didn't misunderstand what he said. I illustrated the internal logic required to post what he posted.