Which web browsers and why?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

konakona

Diamond Member
May 6, 2004
6,285
1
0
firefox for anandtech and homework, tabbed browsing is easier to cycle between pages than multiple IE windows
IE as well since nearly half of the sites i go to dont work with firefox - mainly javascrpit induced login problems. sad thing is there are tons of sites till being managed and built only to comply with IE standards. actually the only thing i care about on firefox is tabbed browsing.
 

ckk81

Senior member
Apr 9, 2001
265
0
0
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
IE, cause eventually Firefox will be about as safe as a foxhole with water pouring down into it (hackers, spyware, adware).

Also I don't visit p0rn sites.



could you be more specific about why Firefox will not be safe near future?
 

glugglug

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2002
5,340
1
81
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
IE, cause eventually Firefox will be about as safe as a foxhole with water pouring down into it (hackers, spyware, adware).

Also I don't visit p0rn sites.


As opposed to IE, which is already safe as a foxhole full of sulfuric acid.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Spyware is in more places than pr0n sites. In fact, if you know WTF you're doing with pr0n, you don't get spyware from those sites. Morons.
 

AgaBoogaBoo

Lifer
Feb 16, 2003
26,108
5
81
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Seems like Anubis and I are the only Opera fanboys are here.

Nope, I use Opera for everything too :)

I like it because it does everything I want it to and looks nice
 

OMGoddess

Banned
Jun 25, 2004
714
0
0
Originally posted by: ckk81
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
IE, cause eventually Firefox will be about as safe as a foxhole with water pouring down into it (hackers, spyware, adware).

Also I don't visit p0rn sites.



could you be more specific about why Firefox will not be safe near future?

Because as of right now there is what, 3% of all internet users using it? Most of the rich dumb yuppies are using IE, do you think ad writers/viruses are going to write code specifically for 3% or 97% of internet users?

Yes I made the numbers up but I'm pretty sure that they are not above 20% of the market.

Besides couple of weeks ago they found holes and weaknesses in FF that IE was immune to. I'm not saying IE is better then FF, it's just jumping on the bandwagon when you can't even take care of your IE problems then you shouldn't be surfing the net.
 

OMGoddess

Banned
Jun 25, 2004
714
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Spyware is in more places than pr0n sites. In fact, if you know WTF you're doing with pr0n, you don't get spyware from those sites. Morons.

I was being sarcastic. :roll:
 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
on second thought i use AOL browser exclusively. <3 AOL!!!!! LOLLLL!

ok im kidding. i use netzero browser with bonzi buddy installed. he is my bestest pal!
 

neonerd

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2003
8,746
1
0
firefox - good popup blocker, many virus executables don't run in it, tabbed browsing, themes, shortcut keys, extensions, and much more i can't think of off the top of my head :)
 

Mo0o

Lifer
Jul 31, 2001
24,227
3
76
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
Originally posted by: ckk81
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
IE, cause eventually Firefox will be about as safe as a foxhole with water pouring down into it (hackers, spyware, adware).

Also I don't visit p0rn sites.



could you be more specific about why Firefox will not be safe near future?

Because as of right now there is what, 3% of all internet users using it? Most of the rich dumb yuppies are using IE, do you think ad writers/viruses are going to write code specifically for 3% or 97% of internet users?

Yes I made the numbers up but I'm pretty sure that they are not above 20% of the market.

Besides couple of weeks ago they found holes and weaknesses in FF that IE was immune to. I'm not saying IE is better then FF, it's just jumping on the bandwagon when you can't even take care of your IE problems then you shouldn't be surfing the net.

Your comment is kind of vague. Are you saying the people who write the viruses are mostly writing for IE? In that case FF is better.

If you're trying to say the anti-virus people are writing for IE then I would say they are only making programs to cover the holes that FF has already patched. And since you have said FF only covers 3% of the market, there is a good chance there wont be adware/viruses that target FF's specific weaknesses. And in this case, spybot and a good antivirus will take care of the generic ones
 

Frew

Platinum Member
Jul 21, 2004
2,550
1
71
Originally posted by: sniperruff
on second thought i use AOL browser exclusively. <3 AOL!!!!! LOLLLL!

ok im kidding. i use netzero browser with bonzi buddy installed. he is my bestest pal!

Isnt bonzi buddy adware?
 

Mo0o

Lifer
Jul 31, 2001
24,227
3
76
Originally posted by: LeadFrog
Originally posted by: sniperruff
on second thought i use AOL browser exclusively. <3 AOL!!!!! LOLLLL!

ok im kidding. i use netzero browser with bonzi buddy installed. he is my bestest pal!

Isnt bonzi buddy adware?

you're not good w/ sarcasm are you
 

Zeeky Boogy Doog

Platinum Member
Mar 31, 2004
2,295
1
0
you didnt make the distinction between firefox adn mozilla, same people, different browser, oh well though, im firefox, love the tabbed browsing
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
Originally posted by: ckk81
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
IE, cause eventually Firefox will be about as safe as a foxhole with water pouring down into it (hackers, spyware, adware).

Also I don't visit p0rn sites.



could you be more specific about why Firefox will not be safe near future?

Because as of right now there is what, 3% of all internet users using it? Most of the rich dumb yuppies are using IE, do you think ad writers/viruses are going to write code specifically for 3% or 97% of internet users?

Yes I made the numbers up but I'm pretty sure that they are not above 20% of the market.

Besides couple of weeks ago they found holes and weaknesses in FF that IE was immune to. I'm not saying IE is better then FF, it's just jumping on the bandwagon when you can't even take care of your IE problems then you shouldn't be surfing the net.

Why are there more IIS exploits than Apache exploits?
 

OMGoddess

Banned
Jun 25, 2004
714
0
0
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
Originally posted by: ckk81
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
IE, cause eventually Firefox will be about as safe as a foxhole with water pouring down into it (hackers, spyware, adware).

Also I don't visit p0rn sites.



could you be more specific about why Firefox will not be safe near future?

Because as of right now there is what, 3% of all internet users using it? Most of the rich dumb yuppies are using IE, do you think ad writers/viruses are going to write code specifically for 3% or 97% of internet users?

Yes I made the numbers up but I'm pretty sure that they are not above 20% of the market.

Besides couple of weeks ago they found holes and weaknesses in FF that IE was immune to. I'm not saying IE is better then FF, it's just jumping on the bandwagon when you can't even take care of your IE problems then you shouldn't be surfing the net.

Your comment is kind of vague. Are you saying the people who write the viruses are mostly writing for IE? In that case FF is better.

If you're trying to say the anti-virus people are writing for IE then I would say they are only making programs to cover the holes that FF has already patched. And since you have said FF only covers 3% of the market, there is a good chance there wont be adware/viruses that target FF's specific weaknesses. And in this case, spybot and a good antivirus will take care of the generic ones

Sorry, I'm not really up for an argument, (nor do I care win or lose) but I'll just type some more.
You're right FF is better because it is not targeted by writers, but that doesn't mean that it's safer. I'd rather people not sniff what I'm browsing.

Also in my 6 years that I've used IE, I've had pretty minor problems. One more thing is FF does not work with many sites I visit.

Also for FF's specific viruses, your AV won't protect you (at least not current ones) because they are executed by FF itself instead of a seperate executable. I don't know all the details because the article got real technical.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: OMGoddess

Sorry, I'm not really up for an argument, (nor do I care win or lose) but I'll just type some more.
You're right FF is better because it is not targeted by writers, but that doesn't mean that it's safer. I'd rather people not sniff what I'm browsing.

Huh? Use SSL then. :confused:

Also in my 6 years that I've used IE, I've had pretty minor problems. One more thing is FF does not work with many sites I visit.

Those sites are probably broken. I haven't found one yet that doesn't work in FF/Mozilla/Camino/Konqueror/Safari that doesn't have a competitor that does.
 

ActuaryTm

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2003
6,858
12
81
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
Also for FF's specific viruses, your AV won't protect you (at least not current ones) because they are executed by FF itself instead of a seperate executable. I don't know all the details because the article got real technical.
Most of the unfortunate problem of IE lies with ActiveX. Do not believe an analogous exploit exists for most other browsers.
 

OMGoddess

Banned
Jun 25, 2004
714
0
0
Originally posted by: ActuaryTm
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
Also for FF's specific viruses, your AV won't protect you (at least not current ones) because they are executed by FF itself instead of a seperate executable. I don't know all the details because the article got real technical.
Most of the unfortunate problem of IE lies with ActiveX. Do not believe an analogous exploit exists for most other browsers.

I guess I'm one of the lucky bastages that SP2 worked for me without a hitch. Ran since the day it came out (I like taking risks :) ) just ran Spybot 3 days ago, 4 problems none of them involved with activeX :roll:
 

Mo0o

Lifer
Jul 31, 2001
24,227
3
76
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
Originally posted by: ActuaryTm
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
Also for FF's specific viruses, your AV won't protect you (at least not current ones) because they are executed by FF itself instead of a seperate executable. I don't know all the details because the article got real technical.
Most of the unfortunate problem of IE lies with ActiveX. Do not believe an analogous exploit exists for most other browsers.

I guess I'm one of the lucky bastages that SP2 worked for me without a hitch. Ran since the day it came out (I like taking risks :) ) just ran Spybot 3 days ago, 4 problems none of them involved with activeX :roll:

i run spybot about once a week w/ opera and i haven't gotten anything in 5 months.
 

OMGoddess

Banned
Jun 25, 2004
714
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: OMGoddess

Sorry, I'm not really up for an argument, (nor do I care win or lose) but I'll just type some more.
You're right FF is better because it is not targeted by writers, but that doesn't mean that it's safer. I'd rather people not sniff what I'm browsing.

Huh? Use SSL then. :confused:

Also in my 6 years that I've used IE, I've had pretty minor problems. One more thing is FF does not work with many sites I visit.

Those sites are probably broken. I haven't found one yet that doesn't work in FF/Mozilla/Camino/Konqueror/Safari that doesn't have a competitor that does.

I'll be honest I haven't used FF, but people I know that use it had problems viewing certain webpages that I frequent had problems so that was (-)points from me.