• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which teams would you *least* like to win the super bowl?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It looked to me as though Beast-mode was running pretty strong, he does have one thing no other back can claim currently playing, fresh legs. And of course Wilson's a nightmare to defend for 60 minutes.
 
JPB said:
And I must say, Brady and Belichick...MOSTLY Belichick....he does the worst....most pathetic post game conferences I have ever seen in my entire life.
Click to expand...
The guy is weird. And appears bellicose. But he's pretty damn smart, a great football mind.
 
Captante said:
Well I wouldn't say nobody exactly 😀

Untrue ... I hope they don't win BUT I think they most likely will the NFC at this point.

And then lose to the Ravens in the Superbowl. 😉
Click to expand...
That seems to be the expectation. But you know, things don't always happen as expected in sports. We'll see. The 49ers barely lost to the Ravens at the Ravens this year. Both teams are great. I don't expect domination. Either could win. Of course, that may not be the matchup we get.
 
Last edited:
Muse said:
That seems to be the expectation. But you know, things don't always happen as expected in sports. We'll see. The 49ers barely lost to the Ravens at the Ravens this year.
Click to expand...


As I've also said before ... there's a reason I don't bet on football.
 
Muse said:
I don't bet on anything. I wish a lot that I didn't care who wins, that I were more impartial.
Click to expand...


I don't really bet on anything either except maybe $5 against a friend ... foot is especially tough to predict though.

And no question in some ways its more enjoyable (or at least a lot less stressful) when its NOT your team in the big game!
 
Captante said:
I don't really bet on anything either except maybe $5 against a friend ... foot is especially tough to predict though.

And no question in some ways its more enjoyable (or at least a lot less stressful) when its NOT your team in the big game!
Click to expand...
Yeah but there is nothing like the roller-coaster ride of watching your team eke out a last-minute win.
 
Captante said:
I don't really bet on anything either except maybe $5 against a friend ... foot is especially tough to predict though.

And no question in some ways its more enjoyable (or at least a lot less stressful) when its NOT your team in the big game!
Click to expand...
Indeed. The stress has already started for my wife and I. For Saturdays game at 8:15. Wont be long till i'm baking a 30lb ham...and 136 hotwings. The wings should help with the stress tho. LOL

I'm really hoping Ingram will be playing though.
 
BUTCH1 said:
It looked to me as though Beast-mode was running pretty strong, he does have one thing no other back can claim currently playing, fresh legs. And of course Wilson's a nightmare to defend for 60 minutes.
Click to expand...

yes, he's improved through game 1 back and now game 2. And that Homer guy looks really good. I'd like to see more I formation with Homer and Lynch and of course Wilson, all threats. Use Lynch as a fullback, and doing a lot of blocking.
 
zinfamous said:
Well, Seahawks are my #1 to win it, so I'm hoping for the Great Russell Wilson to lead the way and pave a skittle path for Marshawn Lynch, like he was some Canadian salt truck.
Click to expand...

Fun fact: of all the teams still in the playoffs the Hawks have won the superbowl most recently.
 
bobeedee said:
Indy, I'm still laughing about Josh McDaniels 🙂.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure why - absolutely NO ONE here wanted him as our coach outside of the Colts GM. Everyone in Indianapolis was relieved and cheering when he tucked tail and returned to Belicheat. He'll flop again, just like he did in Denver. Even entertaining the thought of hiring McDaniels is retarded. He sucks.
 
IndyColtsFan said:
I'm not sure why - absolutely NO ONE here wanted him as our coach outside of the Colts GM. Everyone in Indianapolis was relieved and cheering when he tucked tail and returned to Belicheat. He'll flop again, just like he did in Denver. Even entertaining the thought of hiring McDaniels is retarded. He sucks.
Click to expand...
Wow. Don't look now Indy, but your total and complete ignorance is showing. McDaniels has six Superbowl rings with the Patriots .What is your criteria for "sucks"? Crawl back under your rock and come out in 2050-maybe the Colts will win a Superbowl by then ,but in reality, not likely.
 
Muse said:
Their chances of them winning it this year are kinda slim.
Click to expand...
they're the hometown team but I agree with you. They're a shell of what they were at the start of the season. Every team has had attrition through injuries but the Seahawks look pretty damaged.
 
bobeedee said:
Wow. Don't look now Indy, but your total and complete ignorance is showing. McDaniels has six Superbowl rings with the Patriots .What is your criteria for "sucks"? Crawl back under your rock and come out in 2050-maybe the Colts will win a Superbowl by then ,but in reality, not likely.
Click to expand...

Actually, your ignorance is showing - do a little research and see what McDaniels did (or in this case, didn’t do) when he was an ACTUAL head coach. That track record is my “criteria.” He was a complete and total disaster and a total laughingstock. Speaking of Super Bowls, you know who made a couple and won one in just a few short years? Denver, right after they kicked Josh’s ass to the curb.

You DO know the difference between a head coach and coordinator, right? Who gives a flying crap what he did as a coordinator? NFL history is littered with great coordinators who flopped as head coaches - which you’d know if you had the slightest clue or knowledge of the game. His actual track record as a head coach is abysmal. Some sucker will hire him and regret it.

Please don’t let the rock you live under hit you in the head on your way back down. You can ill afford it.
 
Last edited:
IndyColtsFan said:
Actually, your incredible ignorance is showing - do a little research and see what McDaniels did (or in this case, didn’t do) when he was an ACTUAL head coach. That track record is my “criteria.” He was a complete and total disaster and a total laughingstock. Speaking of Super Bowls, you know who made a couple and won one in just a few short years? Denver, right after they kicked Josh’s ass to the curb.

You DO know the difference between a head coach and coordinator, right? Who gives a flying crap what he did as a coordinator? NFL history is littered with great coordinators who flopped as head coaches - which you’d know if you had the slightest clue or knowledge of the game. His actual track record as a head coach is abysmal. Some sucker will hire him and regret it.

Please don’t let the rock you live under hit you in the head on your way back down. You can ill afford it.
Click to expand...
Maybe he was still working for the Patriots, a plant.
 
IndyColtsFan said:
Well, there was a videotaping scandal which sealed Josh’s fate with the Broncos......
Click to expand...
Gee, I just now realized why you are such an angry, bitter person-your member name forever attaches you to a second rate, shitty football team. Even the number one pick couldn't bear to play one more season.there (how did that "suck for Luck" season work out for you?).

Maybe the mods will let you change your member name to "Galactically Stupid Patriots Hater".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top