Which team is better?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JRich

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,714
1
71
Originally posted by: Deeko
I voted for the Pats, but the Colts ARE the defending champs and still undefeated.

Lets not refer to the Steelers are the best team in the league until they beat someone that isn't a bottom-feeder (the 49ers, despite being 2-0, are not a good team).

Oh ya. The Pats victories come from teams that are a combined 2-7 right now. :roll:
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Deeko
I voted for the Pats, but the Colts ARE the defending champs and still undefeated.

Lets not refer to the Steelers are the best team in the league until they beat someone that isn't a bottom-feeder (the 49ers, despite being 2-0, are not a good team).

i think the "stealers" quote above was to the pats STEALING signs via video tape

The posted comment (which has been quoted twice now) has said Steelers. Pretty sure they were referring to Pittsburgh, which is pretty mindless of them considering the question on hand was "who is better, Colts or Patriots"
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Deeko
I voted for the Pats, but the Colts ARE the defending champs and still undefeated.

Lets not refer to the Steelers are the best team in the league until they beat someone that isn't a bottom-feeder (the 49ers, despite being 2-0, are not a good team).

i think the "stealers" quote above was to the pats STEALING signs via video tape

The posted comment (which has been quoted twice now) has said Steelers. Pretty sure they were referring to Pittsburgh, which is pretty mindless of them considering the question on hand was "who is better, Colts or Patriots"

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
It's close, but Colts have the edge simply because I hate the "Stealers"


that was the post i thought they were responding to.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Well if that's the case...they can't spell, because they said steelers. haha.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: JRich
Originally posted by: Deeko
I voted for the Pats, but the Colts ARE the defending champs and still undefeated.

Lets not refer to the Steelers are the best team in the league until they beat someone that isn't a bottom-feeder (the 49ers, despite being 2-0, are not a good team).

Oh ya. The Pats victories come from teams that are a combined 2-7 right now. :roll:

curious as to what the records for opposing teams of all the 3-0 teams are, willing to bet that they are all below .500.

amazing how one team winning means the other team gets a loss on their record. hmm, wonder if there is some kind of correlation. couldn't be could it?


edit

i'm bored so i did the numbers.

steelers opponents combined record, 3 and 6
colts opponents combined record (5 and 4) (assuming a win in tonites game between the saints and titans)
Cowboys opponents combined record 2 and 7
Packers opponents combined record 3 and 6

i think i'm seeing a pattern here.
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: JRich
Originally posted by: Deeko
I voted for the Pats, but the Colts ARE the defending champs and still undefeated.

Lets not refer to the Steelers are the best team in the league until they beat someone that isn't a bottom-feeder (the 49ers, despite being 2-0, are not a good team).

Oh ya. The Pats victories come from teams that are a combined 2-7 right now. :roll:

curious as to what the records for opposing teams of all the 3-0 teams are, willing to bet that they are all below .500.

amazing how one team winning means the other team gets a loss on their record. hmm, wonder if there is some kind of correlation. couldn't be could it?

Stop using logic.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: JRich
Originally posted by: Deeko
I voted for the Pats, but the Colts ARE the defending champs and still undefeated.

Lets not refer to the Steelers are the best team in the league until they beat someone that isn't a bottom-feeder (the 49ers, despite being 2-0, are not a good team).

Oh ya. The Pats victories come from teams that are a combined 2-7 right now. :roll:

curious as to what the records for opposing teams of all the 3-0 teams are, willing to bet that they are all below .500.

amazing how one team winning means the other team gets a loss on their record. hmm, wonder if there is some kind of correlation. couldn't be could it?

edit

i'm bored so i did the numbers.

steelers opponents combined record, 3 and 6
colts opponents combined record (5 and 4) (assuming a win in tonites game between the saints and titans)
Cowboys opponents combined record 2 and 7
Packers opponents combined record 3 and 6

i think i'm seeing a pattern here.

Stop using logic.

sorry about that.

but to use logic further, all the 3 - 0 teams opponents have losing records except the colts.

mb the difference in point differential scored between colts and their opponents vs pats and their opponents is the quality of opponents played. hmmmm.

 

JRich

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,714
1
71
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: JRich
Originally posted by: Deeko
I voted for the Pats, but the Colts ARE the defending champs and still undefeated.

Lets not refer to the Steelers are the best team in the league until they beat someone that isn't a bottom-feeder (the 49ers, despite being 2-0, are not a good team).

Oh ya. The Pats victories come from teams that are a combined 2-7 right now. :roll:

curious as to what the records for opposing teams of all the 3-0 teams are, willing to bet that they are all below .500.

amazing how one team winning means the other team gets a loss on their record. hmm, wonder if there is some kind of correlation. couldn't be could it?

edit

i'm bored so i did the numbers.

steelers opponents combined record, 3 and 6
colts opponents combined record (5 and 4) (assuming a win in tonites game between the saints and titans)
Cowboys opponents combined record 2 and 7
Packers opponents combined record 3 and 6

i think i'm seeing a pattern here.

Stop using logic.

sorry about that.

but to use logic further, all the 3 - 0 teams opponents have losing records except the colts.

mb the difference in point differential scored between colts and their opponents vs pats and their opponents is the quality of opponents played. hmmmm.

What I'm trying to get at is that the Pats have played 2 bottom feeders and 1 over hyped team and they're supposedly the best team? The Steelers played the same caliber teams and they're no good? For me it's too soon to tell, but I picked the Colts because they are the defending SB champs.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: JRich
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: JRich
Originally posted by: Deeko
I voted for the Pats, but the Colts ARE the defending champs and still undefeated.

Lets not refer to the Steelers are the best team in the league until they beat someone that isn't a bottom-feeder (the 49ers, despite being 2-0, are not a good team).

Oh ya. The Pats victories come from teams that are a combined 2-7 right now. :roll:

curious as to what the records for opposing teams of all the 3-0 teams are, willing to bet that they are all below .500.

amazing how one team winning means the other team gets a loss on their record. hmm, wonder if there is some kind of correlation. couldn't be could it?

edit

i'm bored so i did the numbers.

steelers opponents combined record, 3 and 6
colts opponents combined record (5 and 4) (assuming a win in tonites game between the saints and titans)
Cowboys opponents combined record 2 and 7
Packers opponents combined record 3 and 6

i think i'm seeing a pattern here.

Stop using logic.

sorry about that.

but to use logic further, all the 3 - 0 teams opponents have losing records except the colts.

mb the difference in point differential scored between colts and their opponents vs pats and their opponents is the quality of opponents played. hmmmm.

What I'm trying to get at is that the Pats have played 2 bottom feeders and 1 over hyped team and they're supposedly the best team? The Steelers played the same caliber teams and they're no good? For me it's too soon to tell, but I picked the Colts because they are the defending SB champs.

i'd say your logic is based on too little, just the opponents W/L record, it doesn't take into consideration the actual talent on the teams, how they fared last year, how they fared the last 5 or 6 seasons and the impact of the coach among other things.

for me the keys are:

the pats have won 3 of 4 super bowls in the last 10 years, belicheck is one of the best coaches in the league.
the pats have added to their already formidible offense by adding randy moss.
the points spread in the wins by the pats.

the steelers lose to the pats in all 3 categories.
so do the cowboys.

the colts are the only ones that stack up with the pats, hence the poll.

but for my money, if i were betting on the best team right now, i think you'd be foolish not to pick the pats.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
PATS are clearly the best team in the league right now, that doesn't mean that they will win the super bowl but right now, the pats are the best team in the nfl.
Much as I hate to say it, I agree with this. We'll see for sure in a few weeks. Of course, none of this means much of anything when it comes to the post-season. A lot can happen between now and the playoffs.

 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
By your logic, the Steelers should still be 4th (maybe 5th) on the list of top teams. Its too early to use records as an example, because the game the teams in question played counts for 1/3 of it. The Steelers have beaten 1 division rival, 0 playoff teams from last year. They look a lot better than I thought they would, but of the unbeatens, they clearly have had the easiest schedule so far.

At any rate, on the subject of colts/pats, they're both 3-0, they've both played 2 division rivals and a playoff team from last year (actually the pats played 2). The Colts have the edge of being the returning champs, but against "similar" opponents, the Pats are blowing people out while the Colts have just squeeked by recently. I'm saying Patriots, but they play each other in a few weeks anyway, so we'll just have to see then.
 

JRich

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,714
1
71
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: JRich
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold


sorry about that.

but to use logic further, all the 3 - 0 teams opponents have losing records except the colts.

mb the difference in point differential scored between colts and their opponents vs pats and their opponents is the quality of opponents played. hmmmm.

What I'm trying to get at is that the Pats have played 2 bottom feeders and 1 over hyped team and they're supposedly the best team? The Steelers played the same caliber teams and they're no good? For me it's too soon to tell, but I picked the Colts because they are the defending SB champs.

i'd say your logic is based on too little, just the opponents W/L record, it doesn't take into consideration the actual talent on the teams, how they fared last year, how they fared the last 5 or 6 seasons and the impact of the coach among other things.

for me the keys are:

the pats have won 3 of 4 super bowls in the last 10 years, belicheck is one of the best coaches in the league.
the pats have added to their already formidible offense by adding randy moss.
the points spread in the wins by the pats.

the steelers lose to the pats in all 3 categories.
so do the cowboys.

the colts are the only ones that stack up with the pats, hence the poll.

but for my money, if i were betting on the best team right now, i think you'd be foolish not to pick the pats.

Yes, I agree. If you go back enough to encompass more data the Pats are the better team. Fortunately, I'm not a gambling man. I believe in the "Any Sunday" philosophy. ;)
 

Felisity

Senior member
Sep 1, 2002
382
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Well only one of those teams is the defending champion.
And only one of those teams is a documented cheater.

Choice is obvious.

QFT :thumbsup:
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Well only one of those teams is the defending champion.
And only one of those teams is a documented cheater.

Choice is obvious.
And one of those teams has 3 SuperBowl rings; one from being the underdog.


 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Originally posted by: spidey07
Well only one of those teams is the defending champion.
And only one of those teams is a documented cheater.

Choice is obvious.
And one of those teams has 3 SuperBowl rings; one from being the underdog.

Oh yeah?

Well we have your kicker that won a lot of your games. AND the current champions. AND the best quarterback in the league.

neener.