Which ram?

[Brian23]

Originally posted by: rgreen83

Originally posted by: Brian23

Originally posted by: Elcs

Originally posted by: TStep
Brian, how's that socket 940>939 conversion goin'?

He cut a pin off his VIA chip and stuck it on his 939 chip. Problem solved.

WRONG! I had a 940 pin AMD chip and I cut one off and stuck it in a 939 board. All the extra pin is for is the ECC to check memory errors. Since I'm not using ECC memory, I don't need that pin so I cut it off. It's the smartest thing I ever did.

Might you take a picture and highlight which pin we should remove please? I would like to do this also! 😉

Here is a picture of the CPU after the pin is removed. I circled where it used to be so that you can mod your CPU too! No need to thank me, I understand you're excited that you'll soon be using a processor without that Emergency Coruption Check stuff. (a type of memory, I mean, everyone needs to reply, I mean in Soveit Russia..., I mean the message is clear, I mean SPIDER, I mean WTFBBQ hi2u.)

Oh and FIRST POST!

 

[KoolDrew]

Originally posted by: t3h l337 n3wb
Buy good value RAM and run a divider.

:thumsup;

There is no reason to go with expensive RAM as it will not benefit you much. Get 2GB of Corsair Value Select for $150 or somewhere around there.

 

[imported_g33k]

nef, nef, nef

 

[deadken]

Originally posted by: CheesePoofs
ECC ram and registered ram are two different things.....

Exactly CORRECT! Please remember to send in your registration card and that should clear up any problems. I had a problem when I bought some 'used' registered memory from a guy on a forum and the memory didn't work right. It ends up that the registration card had been returned for lack of postage, and so the factory had never enabled the 'registered' function of the memory. I think that they do it with a beam from a satellite!

 

[Killmenow]

Originally posted by: fatty4ksu

Everyone needs to reply.

This might be irrelavent....but i just farted 😵

Originally posted by: Cheezeit

lets just let this thread die

This thread OWNZ!!! >_> <_<

 

[David Brent]

Originally posted by: crimson117

Originally posted by: Amplifier

Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
I do lots of video encoding, and want to "Overclock" (process of speeding up CPU) my X2 4400+ to 2.4 ghz only.

http://www.monarchcomputer.com/Merchant...de=140215&Category_Code=Unbuffered_OCZ

http://www.monarchcomputer.com/Merchant...de=140226&Category_Code=Unbuffered_OCZ

Everyone needs to reply.

Why the fvck are you getting an AMD that only runs at 2.4ghz when you can get an Intel that runs at 3.4ghz for the same price.

Which intel processor would that be? The Intel Pentium 4 650 for $420? Which gets beat by Athlon 64's that cost half that amount?

Besides, the Athlon 64 X2 4400+ costs $600+, and I couldn't even find it in stock yet.

haha he took the bait 😀

 

[w00t]

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
"Overclock" (process of speeding up CPU)

Thanks for clearing that up for us...

 

[fatty4ksu]

Folks, this is a fantastic thread that displays excellent knowledge of Computers*

*Thing you use to play games/surf interent/etc....

 

[Calin]

Originally posted by: Amplifier

Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
Amplifier,

According to "Benchies" at a lower "Clock" the "AMD" CPU performs better than the "Intel Pentium 4" at the higher frequenices.

This is a common mistakes for noobies (You) so I understand the awful, ugly horrible error.

Thank you.

You're saying 3.4ghz is slower than 2.4ghz, lol give me a break. That's like saying a Porsche that hits 190mph is slower than a Civic that can only hit 80mph.

AMD is a thirdworld chipset manufactorer that makes cheap knockoff Intel chips.

I'm guessing you don't like America. The only reason a person would buy AMD over Intel is irrational hatred for the US of A.

Who has factories in Phillipines? Last time I heard, Phillipines were a third world country

 

[David Brent]

Originally posted by: Amplifier

Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
Amplifier,

According to "Benchies" at a lower "Clock" the "AMD" CPU performs better than the "Intel Pentium 4" at the higher frequenices.

This is a common mistakes for noobies (You) so I understand the awful, ugly horrible error.

Thank you.

You're saying 3.4ghz is slower than 2.4ghz, lol give me a break. That's like saying a Porsche that hits 190mph is slower than a Civic that can only hit 80mph.

AMD is a thirdworld chipset manufactorer that makes cheap knockoff Intel chips.

I'm guessing you don't like America. The only reason a person would buy AMD over Intel is irrational hatred for the US of A.

the sad thing is that i've had a teacher say almost exactly that, and he was serious

 

[Aquila76]

Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
Folks, this is a fantastic thread that displays excellent knowledge of Computers*

*Thing you use to play games/surf interent/etc....

You can do more than watch pr0n with a PC? Awesome! I must "Ask Jeeves" about this new capability.

 

[Hurricane Andrew]

Originally posted by: Phil
Well, we apparently must reply, so I think you should go with a VIA C3 processor and underclock it. Trust me, it'll kick the ass of Xeon workstations every day. VIA 4 evar omglolzrox0rzzz!!oneeleven!

Speaking of VIA, didn't they buy Cyrix? I'd look at some of those 286 and 386 Cyrix CPU's. They were awesome.

Then again, seriously, a better choice might be to go with a rack of these CPU's. I mean, look at the first one - 486! It would take well over a hundred of those 3.4's to get anywhere near a 486!

 

[hippotautamus]

Originally posted by: Aquila76

Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
Folks, this is a fantastic thread that displays excellent knowledge of Computers*

*Thing you use to play games/surf interent/etc....

You can do more than watch pr0n with a PC? Awesome! I must "Ask Jeeves" about this new capability.

Really? 😵

 

[l Xes l]

Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
Everyone needs to reply.

NO. FU.

 

[Aquila76]

Originally posted by: Hurricane Andrew

Originally posted by: Phil
Well, we apparently must reply, so I think you should go with a VIA C3 processor and underclock it. Trust me, it'll kick the ass of Xeon workstations every day. VIA 4 evar omglolzrox0rzzz!!oneeleven!

Speaking of VIA, didn't they buy Cyrix? I'd look at some of those 286 and 386 Cyrix CPU's. They were awesome.

Then again, seriously, a better choice might be to go with a rack of these CPU's. I mean, look at the first one - 486! It would take well over a hundred of those 3.4's to get anywhere near a 486!

Pffft. 486 - No f'ing way. This PC is the way to go. IT HAS A PRESSURE RELEASE WHEEL!