Londo_Jowo
Lifer
Yep, you're butthurtWorth re-iterating the point about credibility/integrity of people who accuse everyone else of what they're posterchildren for.
Yep, you're butthurtWorth re-iterating the point about credibility/integrity of people who accuse everyone else of what they're posterchildren for.
Yep, you're butthurt
LMAO!!!! You're suffering from massive butthurt syndrome.I think it's pretty obvious who's so butthurt that they feel compelled to keep compensating with trademark empty bluster.
LMAO!!!! You're suffering from massive butthurt syndrome.
It's okay, you may grow out of it but I seriously doubt it. You'll always suffer from butthurt and self hate.Thanks for reliably demonstrating every point I ever make about conservatives. That's why you make such a great one.
It's okay, you may grow out of it but I seriously doubt it. You'll always suffer from butthurt and self hate.
So you're a big supporter of Putin. I guess you became infatuated with him during the 2009 reset with Hillary huh?
LMAO!!!! You're suffering from massive butthurt syndrome.
Ahhhh poor butthurt angry petulant child has nothing to offer
She looked so sad and angry just like all the other butthurt liberals over the election results.
LMAO!!! You're sad, angry, and butthurt with big dose of self hate to boot.
Kind of suspicious that professional hackers with all the resources of the entire Russian government couldn't hack into a server of which they obviously knew, with no real-time security monitoring, which didn't even have encryption for some time.
I think any reasonable minded person could only assume the Russians had access to her server.
I think any reasonable minded person could only assume the Russians had access to her server. Hell im sure the Russians had access to those using "secure" emails as well. It's no shock that the NSA has access to damned near everything, why assume Russia doesn't have the same capability? But no evidence it was hacked? What evidence would their be?
A true state level infiltration of a server with that level of "protection" would leave no traces. On the other hand, if we accept that Russia's ability is limited to laughably transparent phishing emails and guessing passwords set by morons, then it might leave some traces. Although since Hillary destroyed the devices and wiped the servers, there would be no way to find them. If however the Podesta and DNC hacks (or more accurately, the publishing of embarrassing emails from those hacks) were truly the work of Russian state hackers, then the best evidence would be the lack of published emails.I think any reasonable minded person could only assume the Russians had access to her server. Hell im sure the Russians had access to those using "secure" emails as well. It's no shock that the NSA has access to damned near everything, why assume Russia doesn't have the same capability? But no evidence it was hacked? What evidence would their be?
A true state level infiltration of a server with that level of "protection" would leave no traces.
On the other hand, if we accept that Russia's ability is limited to laughably transparent phishing emails and guessing passwords set by morons, then it might leave some traces. Although since Hillary destroyed the devices and wiped the servers, there would be no way to find them.
If however the Podesta and DNC hacks (or more accurately, the publishing of embarrassing emails from those hacks) were truly the work of Russian state hackers, then the best evidence would be the lack of published emails.
We know from the Podesta hacks that whoever phished his account had the address of the Hillary server. Personally I find it impossible to reconcile Russia being responsible for Hillary's defeat and yet also unable to crack her server. But to those who otherwise find Hillary's defeat impossible to understand, I understand the attraction of blaming Russia.
I've asked several times on here but no one has given an answer, assuming these were hacks and not leaks and assuming the Russians were involved, which of the releases were they behind? There were multiple releases throughout the election season that tend to get lumped together but they were distinct and different, which if any were the Russians behind?
Secretary of state nominee Rex Tillerson said it was "a fair assumption" that Russian president Vladimir Putin had been behind hacks of the US Democratic party during the election campaign. Mr Trump also said for the first time "I think it was Russia"
Trump, the undisputed source of truth for many here, now thinks the DNC hacks were by Russia apparently:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38591754
And if anyone is interested in reading a timeline of Trump's various denials and insinuations on this topic:
https://www.wired.com/2017/01/timeline-trumps-strange-contradictory-statements-russian-hacking/
I must admit that at the time I hadn't considered the obvious third choice of deafening silence.
Still not as lame as Trump saying "See? Russia says they didn't do it! So NYAH!"Look the same guy that swore the NSA was not spying on everyday Americans says it was the Russians. That is good enough for me.
Maybe. The Podesta "hack" was how we caught Hillary editing those emails that she chose to be printed out and turned over, so I assumed there was overlap. Haven't looked up the exact time line, so maybe that was an old message still on his computer.I doubt you're qualified to make that assertion.
You know the servers weren't wiped. Bleachbit does not wipe drives. We've been through this before yet you assert the same falsehoods over & over in true propagandist fashion.
Nice word salad, anyway. The purpose of the leaks was to discredit Hillary & the Democrats, plain & simple, per our intelligence agencies. It obviously worked as intended.
Hillary's server from her SoS days was offline & retired when Podesta's email was hacked. You know that too.
Maybe. The Podesta "hack" was how we caught Hillary editing those emails that she chose to be printed out and turned over, so I assumed there was overlap. Haven't looked up the exact time line, so maybe that was an old message still on his computer.
Maybe. The Podesta "hack" was how we caught Hillary editing those emails that she chose to be printed out and turned over, so I assumed there was overlap. Haven't looked up the exact time line, so maybe that was an old message still on his computer.
Look the same guy that swore the NSA was not spying on everyday Americans says it was the Russians. That is good enough for me.