Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: BigToque
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: mwmorph
White gold fades over time so I skipped over that. IMO, it's not a good idea to buy a ring that is supposed to symbolize the permanence of marriage with something that will fade over as little as 5 years.
Palladium is not a bad choice, assuming your fiancee to be isn't too attached to the ideas that rings should be made of the traditional metals and doesn't seen Palladium as a cheap substitute than platinum. Palladium is slightly harder than platinum, even whiter and much lighter without using rhodium plating while still able to develop the patina like platinum. Overall it's more durable. The bad thing is there's less prestige in palladium, you never see "palladium" mastercards, only gold and platinum.
Platinum is expensive but it gives her one more thing ot make her girl-friends jealous about.
Why not gold? I wanted to go a white metal for a while but then i realized any woman with any sort of tan would look better with gold/rose gold, also it seems more classy to me.
Originally posted by: Joemonkey
4. Tungsten Carbide
+1 for the wedding band. If my ring was anything else, it'd be all scratched to hell but Tungsten Carbide is like the superman of rings. 0 scratches and I don't exactly baby it. I've even done light weightlifting with it on and even the steel bars cant scratch it.
I'm leaning towards palladium as well, against what seems to be most atoters.
She doesn't know anything about jewelry, doesn't wear earrings, necklaces or rings. Said as long as its shiny, she'll be happy and will basically be happy ignorant of the materials as long as its pretty.
EDIT: She also has paler, more sensitive skin, so gold is out for possible allergenic reasons.
Well if your choice is now between two, just go for the platinum. You may think she knows nothing, but I guarantee she knows that it's popular to get the platinum.
For an extra $500 out of your pocket she'll be able to say to anyone that asks for the rest of her life that she has a platinum ring and be able to walk away smiling.
That's probably the best $500 investment you'll ever make.
Well I'd hope he knows his fiancee well enough to buy something that wont make a deal out of the whole palladium/platinum thing.
I do have to agree platinum is more "romantic" and it's image is second to none but it is very expensive. If it was up to me, I would probably go Platinum ($500 over the next 50 years isn't a bad deal) since it offers so much more sentimental value.
also, :thumbsup: on the Remington 700, it's a great rifle, it's what the Army's M24 and Marine's M40 sniper rifles are based off.
Personally, I like platinum for a couple of legitimate reasons (as mentioned earlier in the thread). Anyway, regardless of how anyone feels about marketing gimicks, "it's a waste of money", etc. the bottom line is that it's become a social custom. Is a few hundred bucks (or thousand for the diamond included) over a lifetime really worth the social downside of having your wife explain or defend why you didn't get something "better" everytime someone asks her about it?
Make her happy, and I'm sure she'll be more than happy to make you happy 🙂