Originally posted by: Chiropteran
Cheap beer is worse. Cheap liquor is fine for mixing.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
I touch neither. When money gets that tight, I cease alcohol consumption until the funds loosen up.
Originally posted by: Captante
Both are nasty, however beer is much worse because it takes a lot more of it to get ripped enough so you can't tell anymore!
Edit: Poll needs an option for cheap wine which may well be the nastiest of all!
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
actually, the question is "which is WORST" since you are comparing 3 or more things, it requires the superlative (best/worst) instead of the comparative (better/worse) which is used for 2 items (A or B)
in general, my preferences are liquor > wine > beer.
Originally posted by: Bateluer
I touch neither. When money gets that tight, I cease alcohol consumption until the funds loosen up.
Originally posted by: JohnCU
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
actually, the question is "which is WORST" since you are comparing 3 or more things, it requires the superlative (best/worst) instead of the comparative (better/worse) which is used for 2 items (A or B)
in general, my preferences are liquor > wine > beer.
my original thread said which is worse, beer or liquor then i added wine and forgot to chance worse to worst. i am failbeer![]()
Originally posted by: Row1and
do not buy cheap beer. my dad does, and I hate it.. i hate busch lite!
