• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which CPU should i get?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
Originally posted by: 1Dark1Sharigan1
I should probably correct my statement:

3000+ is much faster for gaming and memory-depedent apps
P4 3.0 is faster for encoding and general multimedia apps . . .


So is the AMD 3500+ faster than the intel 3 ghz at encoding and general multimedia apps?

Go to Tom's Hardware and look up their CPU charts.
 
AMD currently has the more advanced, innovative, energy efficient, and (most of the time) faster processors than Intel.

Currently Intel is sold in the major pre-built systems because of its strength in manipulating the market, not because of its superiority over AMD.

As RKS alluded to above, it is a lot of work to build your own system. You need to be prepared to read a lot of articles on system components. It is well worth the effort to do this and people here would be very willing to help guide you in what to read. For starters, people are expected to have read the current articles and reviews provided by Anandtech. Read through many and find those which interest you. Maybe you like video cards because it helps you with games. Maybe you prefer linux because it deals with open source software, which will help you develop software and perform better in your programming classes. Maybe you prefer linux because it will help you learn how to administer systems. It would be good to become very familiar with the recent articles within the relevent tabs at the top of the page.

Some good ones:
If you are genuinely interested in this material, you will want to continue reading more of these articles. Follow your interests and ask for help if you get stuck or confused. We will gladly help and we all understand how confusing computers can be.

It would be best for you if you were to learn how to build a system and then build your own system. It would be a great learning opportunity that will help you further down the road in anything else you do. It will require time but can be very satisfying and fun.

Read through the following site for more information on building your own system.
www.mechBgon.com

A good recommendation would be:

You can read more about power supplies here: PSU 101.

Total Cost is:
  • As little as: $133 + $114 + $11 + $86 + $111 + $43 + $89 + $40 + $77 = $704
  • or as great as: $133 + $114 + $11 + $126 + $111 + $52 + $191 + $40 + $77 = $855
 
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
Uhh, so AMD sucks at multimedia apps and encoding?1? 🙁

No, AMD doesn't suck but simply that a Intel P4 3.0 would be faster than a 3000+ when it comes to encoding and multimedia . . .
 
Originally posted by: 1Dark1Sharigan1
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
Uhh, so AMD sucks at multimedia apps and encoding?1? 🙁

No, AMD doesn't suck but simply that a Intel P4 3.0 would be faster than a 3000+ when it comes to encoding and multimedia . . .


what do you mean by encoding and multimedia? Like watching dvds, or video editing?
 
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
Originally posted by: 1Dark1Sharigan1
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
Uhh, so AMD sucks at multimedia apps and encoding?1? 🙁

No, AMD doesn't suck but simply that a Intel P4 3.0 would be faster than a 3000+ when it comes to encoding and multimedia . . .


what do you mean by encoding and multimedia? Like watching dvds, or video editing?

Do not worry about this minor difference. They both perform extremely well and the difference between them is minor. Additionally, the AMD cpu will consume much less electricity than the Intel and allows faster and more efficient communication with the RAM memory due to its onboard memory controller. This is a great benefit for overclocking the system.
 
Originally posted by: birdpup
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
Originally posted by: 1Dark1Sharigan1
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
Uhh, so AMD sucks at multimedia apps and encoding?1? 🙁

No, AMD doesn't suck but simply that a Intel P4 3.0 would be faster than a 3000+ when it comes to encoding and multimedia . . .


what do you mean by encoding and multimedia? Like watching dvds, or video editing?

Do not worry about this minor difference. They both perform extremely well and the difference between them is minor. Additionally, the AMD cpu will consume much less electricity than the Intel and allows faster and more efficient communication with the RAM memory due to its onboard memory controller. This is a great benefit for overclocking the system.


But i'm not going to overclock... I need a processor that's the best for non-gaming purposes
 
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
But i'm not going to overclock... I need a processor that's the best for non-gaming purposes

Seeing as my basic recommendation pushes the price up to $730, it seems that is the best you can do for around $700. You can pay more money for a processor that is preset at a faster speed, you can overclock the processor yourself, or you can live with the 2GHz clock speed of the 3200+ processor. That is your choice. I believe the processor is plenty fast enough without overclocking and eventually, when you are comfortable with your system, you will probably desire to see if you can overclock it. The learning experience is well worth it and by the time you get around to overclocking your system, in about a year or two I would guess, cpu prices will have decreased and you could easily purchase a new cpu should you burn up your 3200+. Most people do not damage their cpu though, so do not be afraid of this.

By the way, I just edited my above recommendation to include a cheaper heatsink and a DVD burner. You can probably obtain a better or cheaper case for your purposes. That is my weak area.

EDIT: I have a 3000+ overclocked to 2400GHz and it is plenty fast for me. I think you will like the 3200+ very much. It is also currently the cheapest processor for its class.

EDIT2: I do not use my system for gaming purposes. In fact, I never touch the games. The 3000+ is fast enough and a 3200+ will do very well for you. Additionally, if you wish to save money and since you are not going to play games, you do not need the 6600 video card. I use a 6200 video card and I think a 5200 would suit my non-gaming needs just fine.

This video card may be better for you:
CHAINTECH Geforce 6200 SE6200/128 Video Card for $89.
 
Originally posted by: birdpup
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
But i'm not going to overclock... I need a processor that's the best for non-gaming purposes

Seeing as my basic recommendation pushes the price up to $730, it seems that is the best you can do for around $700. You can pay more money for a processor that is preset at a faster speed, you can overclock the processor yourself, or you can live with the 2GHz clock speed of the 3200+ processor. That is your choice. I believe the processor is plenty fast enough without overclocking and eventually, when you are comfortable with your system, you will probably desire to see if you can overclock it. The learning experience is well worth it and by the time you get around to overclocking your system, in about a year or two I would guess, cpu prices will have decreased and you could easily purchase a new cpu should you burn up your 3200+. Most people do not damage their cpu though, so do not be afraid of this.

By the way, I just edited my above recommendation to include a cheaper heatsink and a DVD burner. You can probably obtain a better or cheaper case for your purposes. That is my weak area.

EDIT: I have a 3000+ overclocked to 2400GHz and it is plenty fast for me. I think you will like the 3200+ very much. It is also currently the cheapest processor for its class.

SHould i get a AMD 3700+ San Diego instead? Is it equivalent to the 3.0ghz intel?
 
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf
SHould i get a AMD 3700+ San Diego instead? Is it equivalent to the 3.0ghz intel?

I can see you are worried about this. There is no need. AMD currently has better (ie. faster and more efficient) processors than Intel. AMD's clock cycle speed is slower than Intel's but AMD has more instructions per clock cycle than Intel does. Additionally, AMD's cpu pipeline is much shorter than Intel's and this allows the cpu to perform better for varying tasks since it can switch processes faster.

Currently, it is possible to purchase the 3200+ for an incredibly low price of $133 at ewiz. The 3700+ can be purchased for $268 at NewEgg.

3200+ Venice
  • $133
  • Operating Frequency: 2.0GHz
  • L2 Cache: 512KB

3700+ Venice
  • $268
  • Operating Frequency: 2.2GHz
  • L2 Cache: 1024KB = 1MB

There is an operational difference between the two cpu's but it is minimal for the extra $135. If this cost is easily paid for an extra 200MHz and 512KB L2 cache, then go ahead and purchase it. Both of these processors are equivalent to an Intel 3.0GHz cpu and both AMD processors are very good. I am sure you will be happy with either purchase.
 
Originally posted by: BlizzardWolf


SHould i get a AMD 3700+ San Diego instead? Is it equivalent to the 3.0ghz intel?

I would stop comparing AMD 64-bit CPUs to 3.0ghz intel. You've got $1000. Make the most of it with a kick-arse AMD CPU, 2 gigs of low latency mem, and a good PSU and vid card. You can't go wrong. Well, most people cant.
 
Just get an X2 3800+ OEM. Make sure you get the OEM one, because the retail cores are much slower, yet more expensive.
 
I dont understand. Your budget is 1000 and they have put specs up for 750ish.. The cost diffrence by swaping out an X2 (the best chip for what you want to do) will not put you over 1k. The 3700+ will not give you as much of a performance boost with encoding.

Also, no offence. Who is building this? It is apperent with your question about cpu sockets that you do not have much experiance with building a computer. Thus, I would suggest buying a dell or store bought system that will do what you want with minimal building requirements.

PKing
 
Back
Top