Evadman
Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
- Feb 18, 2001
- 30,990
- 5
- 81
I have never once had any Porsche stop running or leave me stranded. Never. My Honda failed completely more often than any of my Porsches (including the 30 year old 914), it just cost a lot less in scheduled maintenance.Originally posted by: Minjin
Gotta love how Porsche people talk about how their cars just require lots of maintenance. If any other kind of car fell apart as much as their Porsches', they'd call it a piece of junk. "Oh, its not falling apart, its just the previous owner didn't follow the maintenance schedule PERFECTLY"....yeah, right.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I have never once had any Porsche stop running or leave me stranded. Never. My Honda failed completely more often than any of my Porsches (including the 30 year old 914), it just cost a lot less in scheduled maintenance.Originally posted by: Minjin
Gotta love how Porsche people talk about how their cars just require lots of maintenance. If any other kind of car fell apart as much as their Porsches', they'd call it a piece of junk. "Oh, its not falling apart, its just the previous owner didn't follow the maintenance schedule PERFECTLY"....yeah, right.
The expense issue with Porsches is that the normal repairs for a 10+ year old car that would cost $50 on an American vehicle cost $500 on the Porsche and there are very few shops that know how to work on a Porsche. There are some things that are astronomical (changing the clutch on my 951 is 23 shop hours and just barely under $4,000 once all is said and done, for example), and other things have an interval that is less than normal (timing belt on the 944 is only a 30,000 mile replacement interval rather than the usual 60,000 to 90,000 mile interval, but it's otherwise no different from any other interferance engine), but I've never seen any Porsche "fall apart" or leave its driver stranded.
That said, yes, if the Porsche were a Mitsubishi or something equally without redeeming driving value nobody would put up with the maintenance expense. Cars, however, are rather like women, and the finest and most worthy examples often require the greatest amounts of attention. Great vices require greater virtues if they are to be tolerated and there's a reason that Porsches' vices are tolerated so well.
ZV
The only maintenance item that is significantly different from any other 1986 vehicle on my 951 is the timing belt. Otherwise the maintenance schedule is essentially identical to any other 20 year old car. I'm certainly not replacing parts any more often. I'm perfectly willing to pull the receipts to show what's been done to the car, none of it is outside of normal items on a car that is 20 years old with 155,000 miles.Originally posted by: Minjin
But when it comes down to it, you replace parts on a Porsche a lot more than many other cars...
Oh, and no bite here on the silly Mitsubishi jab. :disgust:
Mark
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
The only maintenance item that is significantly different from any other 1986 vehicle on my 951 is the timing belt. Otherwise the maintenance schedule is essentially identical to any other 20 year old car. I'm certainly not replacing parts any more often. I'm perfectly willing to pull the receipts to show what's been done to the car, none of it is outside of normal items on a car that is 20 years old with 155,000 miles.Originally posted by: Minjin
But when it comes down to it, you replace parts on a Porsche a lot more than many other cars...
Oh, and no bite here on the silly Mitsubishi jab. :disgust:
Mark
As far as Mitsus, the only one I've driven that was decent was a 3000GT VR-4. It was fun. Not all that great in corners, but fun. Horribly overpriced for what it is though. It's absolutely hilarious though to have a Mitsu fan calling any car unreliable. DSMs have the reliability reputation of a Yugo.
ZV
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I'd budget $2,000/year for maintenance on either Porsche though. And remember that any, and I mean any attempt to skimp on maintenance will rapidly snowball into expensive issues. Both the 944 S2 and the 968 will need to have the cam chain tensioner checked immediately because it's a common failure (should be replaced every 30,000 miles, many owners forget) and if it breaks then you can say goodbye to your valves and the engine's head (if you're really un-lucky, the head of a valve can snap off and wreck a piston or cylinder).
Nope. Supply and demand. Here's what's gone wrong in the past year with a 20 year old car:Originally posted by: Minjin
You don't find it ludicrous that it takes $2000 a year to keep a $9000 car on the road? I certainly do...
Mark
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
you'd have to be a seriously fat bastard to not be able to fit into the S2000. it's not THAT small.
