Where's the fence?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
I don't think that anyone expects a simple fence from Home Depot is going to protect our border. The term "fence" to me is a generic term meaning "do a better job securing our border." Meaning give border patrol agents and ICE the capabilities to do their job. Their hands are pretty much tied even if they witness people coming across. I've talked to border patrol agents, they're not even allowed to draw their weapons and physically prevent people from coming across. Then you have people going out into the Arizona desert and providing the illegals crossing the border with food, water, and medical assistance, because "they're humans and they're dying while trying to jump the border because they don't realize how harsh the desert is." Well boo hoo, that should be a deterrent to other idiots trying to cross the desert. A proverbial wall.

I think we should put up a fence and man it where it makes sense, and increase the patrols the rest of the way. Give the border patrol authority to shoot on sight of a border jumper. These people wouldn't be so quick to jump the Rio Grande with their children if they faced the threat of death. You know, basically take what Mexico does on ITS southern border, and tone it down a little.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,618
54,565
136
Originally posted by: Triumph
I don't think that anyone expects a simple fence from Home Depot is going to protect our border. The term "fence" to me is a generic term meaning "do a better job securing our border." Meaning give border patrol agents and ICE the capabilities to do their job. Their hands are pretty much tied even if they witness people coming across. I've talked to border patrol agents, they're not even allowed to draw their weapons and physically prevent people from coming across. Then you have people going out into the Arizona desert and providing the illegals crossing the border with food, water, and medical assistance, because "they're humans and they're dying while trying to jump the border because they don't realize how harsh the desert is." Well boo hoo, that should be a deterrent to other idiots trying to cross the desert. A proverbial wall.

I think we should put up a fence and man it where it makes sense, and increase the patrols the rest of the way. Give the border patrol authority to shoot on sight of a border jumper. These people wouldn't be so quick to jump the Rio Grande with their children if they faced the threat of death. You know, basically take what Mexico does on ITS southern border, and tone it down a little.

You are condemning the basic humanity of providing help to those in need, and you want to kill people on sight who pose no physical threat to anyone because why? Listen to yourselves. You're behaving like animals.

This is bordering (har) on psycopathic.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Triumph
I don't think that anyone expects a simple fence from Home Depot is going to protect our border. The term "fence" to me is a generic term meaning "do a better job securing our border." Meaning give border patrol agents and ICE the capabilities to do their job. Their hands are pretty much tied even if they witness people coming across. I've talked to border patrol agents, they're not even allowed to draw their weapons and physically prevent people from coming across. Then you have people going out into the Arizona desert and providing the illegals crossing the border with food, water, and medical assistance, because "they're humans and they're dying while trying to jump the border because they don't realize how harsh the desert is." Well boo hoo, that should be a deterrent to other idiots trying to cross the desert. A proverbial wall.

I think we should put up a fence and man it where it makes sense, and increase the patrols the rest of the way. Give the border patrol authority to shoot on sight of a border jumper. These people wouldn't be so quick to jump the Rio Grande with their children if they faced the threat of death. You know, basically take what Mexico does on ITS southern border, and tone it down a little.

You are condemning the basic humanity of providing help to those in need, and you want to kill people on sight who pose no physical threat to anyone because why? Listen to yourselves. You're behaving like animals.

This is bordering (har) on psycopathic.

You're going to run off into the desert with no provisions whatsoever to do something illegal, and then you're going to complain that no one is helping you out? You're right, let's start busing these people across in an air conditioned Winebago because the desert is hot and harsh! You're the type of person who thinks that criminals robbing someone's home have a right to sue the homeowner when the criminal breaks his neck inside the home.

You're going to cross a country's sovereign borders and get angry when that country tries to defend itself?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Triumph
I don't think that anyone expects a simple fence from Home Depot is going to protect our border. The term "fence" to me is a generic term meaning "do a better job securing our border." Meaning give border patrol agents and ICE the capabilities to do their job. Their hands are pretty much tied even if they witness people coming across. I've talked to border patrol agents, they're not even allowed to draw their weapons and physically prevent people from coming across. Then you have people going out into the Arizona desert and providing the illegals crossing the border with food, water, and medical assistance, because "they're humans and they're dying while trying to jump the border because they don't realize how harsh the desert is." Well boo hoo, that should be a deterrent to other idiots trying to cross the desert. A proverbial wall.

I think we should put up a fence and man it where it makes sense, and increase the patrols the rest of the way. Give the border patrol authority to shoot on sight of a border jumper. These people wouldn't be so quick to jump the Rio Grande with their children if they faced the threat of death. You know, basically take what Mexico does on ITS southern border, and tone it down a little.

You are condemning the basic humanity of providing help to those in need, and you want to kill people on sight who pose no physical threat to anyone because why? Listen to yourselves. You're behaving like animals.

This is bordering (har) on psycopathic.

You're going to run off into the desert with no provisions whatsoever to do something illegal, and then you're going to complain that no one is helping you out? You're right, let's start busing these people across in an air conditioned Winebago because the desert is hot and harsh! You're the type of person who thinks that criminals robbing someone's home have a right to sue the homeowner when the criminal breaks his neck inside the home.

You're going to cross a country's sovereign borders and get angry when that country tries to defend itself?

You lack morality IMO. There are indeed basic human values which say 'save their lives, then deal with the crime of their trying to come earn a living against our law'.
 

imported_Baloo

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2006
1,782
0
0
Consider the source. It's coming from baby bush's personal bodyguard service, which he calls Homeland security. I just can't seem to believe any of the propaganda that comes from his administration.
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
Let's be honest, even if this piece of news is confirmed to be real, Pro-Illegals here will find plenty of excuses to justify open border even if it means letting terrorists sneak into America. Pro-Illegals rather let terrorists and drugs to flow in and hurt America as long as their skin is not white, that is their thinking.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,618
54,565
136
Originally posted by: babylon5
Let's be honest, even if this piece of news is confirmed to be real, Pro-Illegals here will find plenty of excuses to justify open border even if it means letting terrorists sneak into America. Pro-Illegals rather let terrorists and drugs to flow in and hurt America as long as their skin is not white, that is their thinking.

Do you realize how stupid what you wrote sounds?
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Originally posted by: Craig234

You lack morality IMO. There are indeed basic human values which say 'save their lives, then deal with the crime of their trying to come earn a living against our law'.

Maybe tone it down a bit on the shooting, but in no way, shape, or form should we aid them in crossing the desert. If they die out there, too bad.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: eskimospy
First of all, your reasoning is suspect. But that's the obvious part.

Did you even read the article? To begin with its a local news channel. The same people who try to attract a nightly audience with headlines like "THE NEXT TIME YOU STEP ON YOUR LAWN COULD KILL YOU... FIND OUT HOW AT 11". This is not exactly a credible source.

Finally, even if everything they say is true... she was a person smuggler, not a bomber, and she was "affiliated" (whatever that means) with a pakistani insurgent group aimed against the pakistani government, not us. Pardon me if I'm not sufficiently terrified.

Oh, and by the way a border fence is a really stupid idea.

Why is it not credible source because it's local news?

It's confirmed by a Homeland Security official.

Also, please point out in the article where it says that insurgency group she was affliated with is not a terrorist group per se, but one which has as it's only aim actions against the Pakistani gov.

I suspect that this hasn't been reported by the MSM because of *PC* concerns. Nor would our Administration want this publicized, the only people with a more pro-illegal immigration stance are Mexicans themselves.

Oh, and I thought the Texas official in charge of Border Patrol in Texas recently said that their job was NOT to stop illegal immigrants, but stop terrorists. Looks like they can't do that either. Maybe we should just re-name the Border Patrol to something more appropriate, like the "Border Concierge" and have hand out maps and water bottles.

Fern
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Craig234

You lack morality IMO. There are indeed basic human values which say 'save their lives, then deal with the crime of their trying to come earn a living against our law'.

Niiice...

In one fell swoop you've managed to declare the rest of the morally inferior. You do know that every country has border control?

Walk in tell them you have a basic human right that allows you into their country and see what happens. I tried something similar on my first trip abroad, it quickly *earned* me a trip into a holding cell where how it REALLY works was explained to me.

Oh, I guess if I had the time or interest I could probrably find a post where you object to our being the *World's Policeman*. Yet here you advocate that we be the *World's Welfare System*.

Please, do feel free to donate YOUR money, but leave mine alone.

Fern
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Driving a $40,000.00 Suv over the curb at a restraunt with an expired or suspended license is a job most Americans will not take.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,618
54,565
136
Originally posted by: Fern

Also, please point out in the article where it says that insurgency group she was affliated with is not a terrorist group per se, but one which has as it's only aim actions against the Pakistani gov.

I suspect that this hasn't been reported by the MSM because of *PC* concerns. Nor would our Administration want this publicized, the only people with a more pro-illegal immigration stance are Mexicans themselves.

Oh, and I thought the Texas official in charge of Border Patrol in Texas recently said that their job was NOT to stop illegal immigrants, but stop terrorists. Looks like they can't do that either. Maybe we should just re-name the Border Patrol to something more appropriate, like the "Border Concierge" and have hand out maps and water bottles.

Fern

It said she was part of a Pakistani insurgent group. Insurgent groups are by definition those rebelling against established authority in whatever country they are in... in this case Pakistan. Why the hell would we assume that an insurgent group in another country was out to get us? Isn't that paranoid? There are literally thousands of insurgent groups in the world that have no interest in attacking the US. The only sane way to deal with this reality is to require some reason to believe that they are anti-US before believing it.

My whole point was that the OP's reaction to this news story was ridiculous considering the information contained in it.

Oh, and the reason why local news isn't a credible source can easily be seen by... watching local news.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,618
54,565
136
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Craig234

You lack morality IMO. There are indeed basic human values which say 'save their lives, then deal with the crime of their trying to come earn a living against our law'.

Niiice...

In one fell swoop you've managed to declare the rest of the morally inferior. You do know that every country has border control?

Walk in tell them you have a basic human right that allows you into their country and see what happens. I tried something similar on my first trip abroad, it quickly *earned* me a trip into a holding cell where how it REALLY works was explained to me.

Oh, I guess if I had the time or interest I could probrably find a post where you object to our being the *World's Policeman*. Yet here you advocate that we be the *World's Welfare System*.

Please, do feel free to donate YOUR money, but leave mine alone.

Fern

And by the way yes, if you know that people that you could help are dying and choose to do nothing to help them (or in the case of some people on here, choose to actively try and kill them) you are morally deficient. I don't care what other countries do, and neither should you.
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: babylon5
Let's be honest, even if this piece of news is confirmed to be real, Pro-Illegals here will find plenty of excuses to justify open border even if it means letting terrorists sneak into America. Pro-Illegals rather let terrorists and drugs to flow in and hurt America as long as their skin is not white, that is their thinking.

Do you realize how stupid what you wrote sounds?

Do you realize you don't have even a response?




 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Craig234

You lack morality IMO. There are indeed basic human values which say 'save their lives, then deal with the crime of their trying to come earn a living against our law'.

Niiice...

In one fell swoop you've managed to declare the rest of the morally inferior. You do know that every country has border control?

Walk in tell them you have a basic human right that allows you into their country and see what happens. I tried something similar on my first trip abroad, it quickly *earned* me a trip into a holding cell where how it REALLY works was explained to me.

Oh, I guess if I had the time or interest I could probrably find a post where you object to our being the *World's Policeman*. Yet here you advocate that we be the *World's Welfare System*.

Please, do feel free to donate YOUR money, but leave mine alone.

Fern

And by the way yes, if you know that people that you could help are dying and choose to do nothing to help them (or in the case of some people on here, choose to actively try and kill them) you are morally deficient. I don't care what other countries do, and neither should you.

Yes, Americans constantly stand by and watch people died without doing anything. Like Indonesia earthquake, recent South America affected by storm. American military didn't send any aid to other countries at all. You just keep ignoring facts.


Maybe you can learn from other morally "superior" country like Mexico:


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Mexico Harsh to Undocumented Migrants

By MARK STEVENSON, Associated Press Writer

Considered felons by the government, these migrants fear detention, rape and robbery. Police and soldiers hunt them down at railroads, bus stations and fleabag hotels. Sometimes they are deported; more often officers simply take their money.

While migrants in the United States have held huge demonstrations in recent weeks, the hundreds of thousands of undocumented Central Americans in Mexico suffer mostly in silence.

And though Mexico demands humane treatment for its citizens who migrate to the U.S., regardless of their legal status, Mexico provides few protections for migrants on its own soil. The issue simply isn't on the country's political agenda, perhaps because migrants make up only 0.5 percent of the population, or about 500,000 people ? compared with 12 percent in the United States.

The level of brutality Central American migrants face in Mexico was apparent Monday, when police conducting a raid for undocumented migrants near a rail yard outside Mexico City shot to death a local man, apparently because his dark skin and work clothes made officers think he was a migrant.

Virginia Sanchez, who lives near the railroad tracks that carry Central Americans north to the U.S. border, said such shootings in Tultitlan are common.

"At night, you hear the gunshots, and it's the judiciales (state police) chasing the migrants," she said. "It's not fair to kill these people. It's not fair in the United States and it's not fair here."

Undocumented Central American migrants complain much more about how they are treated by Mexican officials than about authorities on the U.S. side of the border, where migrants may resent being caught but often praise the professionalism of the agents scouring the desert for their trail.

"If you're carrying any money, they take it from you ? federal, state, local police, all of them," said Carlos Lopez, a 28-year-old farmhand from Guatemala crouching in a field near the tracks in Tultitlan, waiting to climb onto a northbound freight train.

Lopez said he had been shaken down repeatedly in 15 days of traveling through Mexico.

"The soldiers were there as soon as we crossed the river," he said. "They said, 'You can't cross ... unless you leave something for us.'"

Jose Ramos, 18, of El Salvador, said the extortion occurs at every stop in Mexico, until migrants are left penniless and begging for food.

"If you're on a bus, they pull you off and search your pockets and if you have any money, they keep it and say, 'Get out of here,'" Ramos said.

Maria Elena Gonzalez, who lives near the tracks, said female migrants often complain about abusive police.

"They force them to strip, supposedly to search them, but the purpose is to sexually abuse them," she said.

Others said they had seen migrants beaten to death by police, their bodies left near the railway tracks to make it look as if they had fallen from a train.

The Mexican government acknowledges that many federal, state and local officials are on the take from the people-smugglers who move hundreds of thousands of Central Americans north, and that migrants are particularly vulnerable to abuse by corrupt police.

The National Human Rights Commission, a government-funded agency, documented the abuses south of the U.S. border in a December report.

"One of the saddest national failings on immigration issues is the contradiction in demanding that the North respect migrants' rights, which we are not capable of guaranteeing in the South," commission president Jose Luis Soberanes said.

In the United States, mostly Mexican immigrants have staged rallies pressuring Congress to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants rather than making them felons and deputizing police to deport them. The Mexican government has spoken out in support of the immigrants' cause.

While Interior Secretary Carlos Abascal said Monday that "Mexico is a country with a clear, defined and generous policy toward migrants," the nation of 105 million has legalized only 15,000 immigrants in the past five years, and many undocumented migrants who are detained are deported.

Although Mexico objects to U.S. authorities detaining Mexican immigrants, police and soldiers usually cause the most trouble for migrants in Mexico, even though they aren't technically authorized to enforce immigration laws.

And while Mexicans denounce the criminalization of their citizens living without papers in the United States, Mexican law classifies undocumented immigration as a felony punishable by up to two years in prison, although deportation is more common.

The number of undocumented migrants detained in Mexico almost doubled from 138,061 in 2002 to 240,269 last year. Forty-two percent were Guatemalan, 33 percent Honduran and most of the rest Salvadoran.

Like the United States, Mexico is becoming reliant on immigrant labor. Last year, then-director of Mexico's immigration agency, Magdalena Carral, said an increasing number of Central Americans were staying in Mexico, rather than just passing through on their way to the U.S.

She said sectors of the Mexican economy facing labor shortages often use undocumented workers because the legal process for work visas is inefficient.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,618
54,565
136
Originally posted by: babylon5
Originally posted by: eskimospy

And by the way yes, if you know that people that you could help are dying and choose to do nothing to help them (or in the case of some people on here, choose to actively try and kill them) you are morally deficient. I don't care what other countries do, and neither should you.

Yes, Americans constantly stand by and watch people died without doing anything. Like Indonesia earthquake, recent South America affected by storm. American military didn't send any aid to other countries at all. You just keep ignoring facts.


Maybe you can learn from other morally "superior" country like Mexico:

*cut*

First of all, it's stupid to say that just because another country does something bad that it's okay for us to do it. Secondly when did I say Mexico was superior? Oh wait, I got it... everything I needed to know about how your brain works was contained in that other post you did that I called stupid.

Your idea that just because America does certain morally questionable things so we should do more certainly morally reprehensible things is very interesting to me. I would like you to explain this further.
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
The point of the article is Mexico don't treat Illegals the way America treat them. American Border Patrol don't beat them, rape them, rob them. Something Pro-Illegals like you ignore--facts.

America sending aids to Indonesia earthquake and South America affected by storm is "morally questionable things" to you now? You are indeed morally deficient.

BTW, keep up with your insults at others instead of using reasons and logic, that is what you're good at.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Fern

Also, please point out in the article where it says that insurgency group she was affliated with is not a terrorist group per se, but one which has as it's only aim actions against the Pakistani gov.

I suspect that this hasn't been reported by the MSM because of *PC* concerns. Nor would our Administration want this publicized, the only people with a more pro-illegal immigration stance are Mexicans themselves.

Oh, and I thought the Texas official in charge of Border Patrol in Texas recently said that their job was NOT to stop illegal immigrants, but stop terrorists. Looks like they can't do that either. Maybe we should just re-name the Border Patrol to something more appropriate, like the "Border Concierge" and have hand out maps and water bottles.

Fern

It said she was part of a Pakistani insurgent group. Insurgent groups are by definition those rebelling against established authority in whatever country they are in... in this case Pakistan. Why the hell would we assume that an insurgent group in another country was out to get us?

Pakistan is not a muslim theocracy (yet). I see no reason to rule out the possibility that she's with some sort of Islamic Jihadist movement.

And if she's part of some group with no interest in the USA, WTH is she doing here? And with a fake (South African) passport to boot.

Fern
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Craig234

You lack morality IMO. There are indeed basic human values which say 'save their lives, then deal with the crime of their trying to come earn a living against our law'.

Niiice...

In one fell swoop you've managed to declare the rest of the morally inferior. You do know that every country has border control?

Walk in tell them you have a basic human right that allows you into their country and see what happens. I tried something similar on my first trip abroad, it quickly *earned* me a trip into a holding cell where how it REALLY works was explained to me.

Oh, I guess if I had the time or interest I could probrably find a post where you object to our being the *World's Policeman*. Yet here you advocate that we be the *World's Welfare System*.

Please, do feel free to donate YOUR money, but leave mine alone.

Fern

And by the way yes, if you know that people that you could help are dying and choose to do nothing to help them (or in the case of some people on here, choose to actively try and kill them) you are morally deficient. I don't care what other countries do, and neither should you.

Mexicans are coming here because they're dying over at home, and are here trying to escape that?

Seriously, that's news to me. I thought that they were economic refugees. Coming here to make even more money and send it home?

Who's persecuting them in Mexico?

Maybe we ought to attack the problem then. Get GWB to lean on the Mexican Presidente to stop the killing.

Fern
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,618
54,565
136
Originally posted by: babylon5
The point of the article is Mexico don't treat Illegals the way America treat them. American Border Patrol don't beat them, rape them, rob them. Something Pro-Illegals like you ignore--facts.

America sending aids to Indonesia earthquake and South America affected by storm is "morally questionable things" to you now? You are indeed morally deficient.

BTW, keep up with your insults at others instead of using reasons and logic, that is what you're good at.

I did misunderstand what you said about Indonesia and South America, I thought you were saying we DIDN'T help them... and that's what I thought was morally questionable. So, my mistake.

That being said, it does nothing to alter my point. How would keeping people in Indonesia from dying possibly make the choice to allow other people to die under our noses any more morally right? How are the two choices even related? And why would Mexico's actions towards illegal immigrants in any way reflect on the morality of our treatment of them? If I were you I wouldn't mention logic in the same thread as these arguments you're putting forward.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,618
54,565
136
Originally posted by: Fern

It said she was part of a Pakistani insurgent group. Insurgent groups are by definition those rebelling against established authority in whatever country they are in... in this case Pakistan. Why the hell would we assume that an insurgent group in another country was out to get us?

Pakistan is not a muslim theocracy (yet). I see no reason to rule out the possibility that she's with some sort of Islamic Jihadist movement.

And if she's part of some group with no interest in the USA, WTH is she doing here? And with a fake (South African) passport to boot.

Fern[/quote]

Okay, so don't rule out the possibility. Before everyone gets their panties all bunched up (as the OP did, and that was what I was referring to) why don't you find out?

And what could you possibly mean what is she doing here if she has no interest in the USA? How about one of ten million different things. The assumption that she must have been part of an anti-us terrorist organization visiting the US for nefarious reasons is simply not justifiable considering the evidence. Hence, my problem with this whole thread from the beginning.

Oh, and I was referring to the people who want to let the Mexican immigrants die in the desert/shoot them/kill them with land mines, not anything else... and yes I believe letting people attempting to illegally immigrate here die is morally wrong. Arrest them, fine... but they don't deserve to die for that, it's wrong.
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
Currently all the wall/fence material is being used in Iraq, shiny 20 ft concrete walls around every Baghdad neighborhood. You'll have to wait your turn
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Here we go again, another fine week in sunny Arizona.

God Bless him and his family and his friends/co-workers.

Is it strange that of the past 7 Phoenix police officers who were murdered, FIVE have been killed by illegal aliens?

Is it ironic that I work at a facility that is named after a police officer... who was murdered by an illegal alien... and this facility provides free services to illegal aliens?

How much is enough, before we get serious about toughening the laws and cutting the flow?