- Oct 16, 2006
- 1,651
- 473
- 136
Doesn't anyone find it peculiar that Anandtech hasn't written any article on Jaguar?
Is Jaguar even out yet? Perhaps the NDA hasn't expired.
Where are Anandtech's Jaguar articles?
Doesn't anyone find it peculiar that Anandtech hasn't written any article on Jaguar?
It's really annoying when almost all the tech sites ignore AMD. Richland is arguably the biggest news of the week and none of the websites have bothered doing reviews. The only review I've seen is on a chinese website where he retrofits a richland cpu onto a trinity msi laptop. I mean since when has a new usb stick or SSD become more important than a cpu release. It seems that along with the OEMs intel has the tech sites and everyone else in their pockets these days.
I was going to rant more about intel fanboyism and how intel cpu performance isn't that much better and that intel cpus are almost always poor value for money. but that is left for another post.
AMD's response:
So, no, there isn't any conspiracy by Intel or its fanboys to keep Richland reviews off the radar. They are coming but the products are still ramping up at the moment.
Which does make sense considering the desktop SKUs are delayed until summertime after all.
Doesn't anyone find it peculiar that Anandtech hasn't written any article on Jaguar?
The Jaguar architecture is already launched, lots of slide available, but Kabini is not released, yet.Is Jaguar even out yet? Perhaps the NDA hasn't expired.
AT covers Atoms extensively so I see no reason why they wouldn't cover Jaguar the same way?Anand said during the PS4 analysis article he hadn't done much digging on it because it didn't seem terribly interesting to AT's audience. He said he was going to start getting more information on it, though.
But yeah, give it time. The G-Series SoCs were just announced yesterday.
AT covers Atoms extensively so I see no reason why they wouldn't cover Jaguar the same way?
Anyway, the products are not yet widely available so this is the (main) reason why it hasn't happened until now. My 2 cents.
AMD is launching the dual GPU HD7990 today, and we would love to tell you all about it but AMD didnt actually tell us. Sure we were at the briefing but none of the promised information was given, nor were any real specs.
If only this were a joke we would be laughing with you, but it isnt actually funny after three or four times around. We were told that we would get a card but only after launch so no point in doing a review. We were promised pricing but it never came. We were told a launch date and hours before launch when we inquired if the materials we were supposed to get come before launch, we were told it was delayed a week or so. If we hadnt asked, we doubt we would have gotten that much.
This isnt to say that AMD PR is not doing their jobs, they are. You might recall that in the layoffs of November 2011 almost everyone in PR was let go. This woeful under-staffing is still woeful, only matched by their lack of resources. The people doing the job simply cant do what they are tasked with, and everything is falling through the cracks. AMD desperately needs to staff the department enough to do the job or just not bother, the current state of affairs is just painful. The task in front of the department now is clearly impossible and it is obvious to any onlooker.
(....)
So overall no specs, no confirmation that it actually does work, and more questions than answers. If this sounds like a criticism of the AMD graphics PR teams, both internal and external, it is the exact opposite. Instead it is a criticism of AMD management not giving them the resources needed to do anything close to the things they are tasked with. Until that changes, dont look for coverage of the company to be worth a damn, we have already turned down a few briefings because they wont result in a story worth reading.
(...)
AT covers Atoms extensively so I see no reason why they wouldn't cover Jaguar the same way?
What the bold part or that whole text have to do with my post? Kabini/Temash is not widely available yet so AT cannot get the parts to test. This has nothing to do with understaffed AMD's marketing department.
AT's coverage of Cedar Trail was also a lot lower than what it did with something like Ivy Bridge. There were two product reviews (http://www.anandtech.com/show/5849/...ss-system-review-cedar-trail-or-cedar-trial/2 and http://www.anandtech.com/show/5701/quick-look-asus-1025c-and-cedar-trail) but the benchmarking was pretty limited. And this didn't happen until a few months after products first appeared.
Hopefully Jaguar gets more than this.
shit, Intel's coverage of Cedar Trail paled in comparison to Anandtech's coverage of Cedar Trail.
From the support Intel threw behind it, you'd think it's mother was raped by a wounded, criminal, immigrant terrorist
I'm going to have to eat my words. BSN just did an excellent write up on embedded kabini.
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2013/4/24/amd-launches-kabini-based-g-series-soc.aspx
