• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

When twin-turbo Supras are common, you build a Tri-Turbo Supra!!

maybe pointless... but i bet it made him happy that he has a triple turbo supra. now he must feel like he has a big co... 😛
 
With those Supras, the auto was not much slower than a stick. I think they were like .1 seconds slower or something.
 
I dont know why ppl are commenting on the automatic on the supra, i believe the fastest drag supra is an automatic(~9sec i think), also i forget what porche, but one of them the auto and the manual had similar numbers.
 
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.

650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?
 
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.

650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?
Click to expand...

I dunno...while in terms of performance its a waste, but in terms of packaging/creativy..I thinks its pretty damn good. It must have been hell to do the plumbing for those turbos.
 
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.

650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?
Click to expand...

I dunno...while in terms of performance its a waste, but in terms of packaging/creativy..I thinks its pretty damn good. It must have been hell to do the plumbing for those turbos.
Click to expand...

I dunno if can really call that creative... that's kinda like calling the Pontiac Aztec "creative"...
He didn't really need a tri-turbo to make a good show car. It prolly drives like crap on top of that... but then since when do people daily drive show cars? Or even drive their show cars?
 
nice show car i guess.

it's auto, so he won't have to put his ps2 controllers down everytime he shifts..😛

i don't understand that, you have a 2+2 car, so you'd prob have one passenger, are you that unappealing that you have to entice your friend into your car by saying, well you can play ps2 while i drive?? or you love your car so much, that you'd rather play it in your car than in your living room? yea the racing games are much more fun when you play them while driving.. whatever
 
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.

650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?
Click to expand...

I dunno...while in terms of performance its a waste, but in terms of packaging/creativy..I thinks its pretty damn good. It must have been hell to do the plumbing for those turbos.
Click to expand...

I dunno if can really call that creative... that's kinda like calling the Pontiac Aztec "creative"...
He didn't really need a tri-turbo to make a good show car. It prolly drives like crap on top of that... but then since when do people daily drive show cars? Or even drive their show cars?
Click to expand...

Actually the Aztec is creative. Seriously. The entire interior with its cool features is very creative packaging..as is the exterior, sure its ugly, but the concept is pretty creative.

Lots of ppl daily drive their show cars, its more fun that way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top