- Oct 11, 1999
- 7,804
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.
650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.
650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?
I dunno...while in terms of performance its a waste, but in terms of packaging/creativy..I thinks its pretty damn good. It must have been hell to do the plumbing for those turbos.
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.
650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?
I dunno...while in terms of performance its a waste, but in terms of packaging/creativy..I thinks its pretty damn good. It must have been hell to do the plumbing for those turbos.
I dunno if can really call that creative... that's kinda like calling the Pontiac Aztec "creative"...
He didn't really need a tri-turbo to make a good show car. It prolly drives like crap on top of that... but then since when do people daily drive show cars? Or even drive their show cars?