When twin-turbo Supras are common, you build a Tri-Turbo Supra!!

boyRacer

Lifer
Oct 1, 2001
18,569
0
0
maybe pointless... but i bet it made him happy that he has a triple turbo supra. now he must feel like he has a big co... :p
 

Crappopotamus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2002
1,920
0
0
nuffin says rice like an automatic supra :p ah well. minus the whole purple scheme there its a pretty pimp car...
 

DieselUV

Senior member
Dec 9, 1999
363
0
0
With those Supras, the auto was not much slower than a stick. I think they were like .1 seconds slower or something.
 

isekii

Lifer
Mar 16, 2001
28,578
3
81
what's wrong with an automatic supra
it'll still decimate whatever it meets on the road
 

oldirtythao

Member
Feb 16, 2001
139
0
0
I dont know why ppl are commenting on the automatic on the supra, i believe the fastest drag supra is an automatic(~9sec i think), also i forget what porche, but one of them the auto and the manual had similar numbers.
 

KokomoGST

Diamond Member
Nov 13, 2001
3,758
0
0
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.

650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?
 

mAdD INDIAN

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,804
1
0
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.

650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?

I dunno...while in terms of performance its a waste, but in terms of packaging/creativy..I thinks its pretty damn good. It must have been hell to do the plumbing for those turbos.
 

KokomoGST

Diamond Member
Nov 13, 2001
3,758
0
0
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.

650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?

I dunno...while in terms of performance its a waste, but in terms of packaging/creativy..I thinks its pretty damn good. It must have been hell to do the plumbing for those turbos.

I dunno if can really call that creative... that's kinda like calling the Pontiac Aztec "creative"...
He didn't really need a tri-turbo to make a good show car. It prolly drives like crap on top of that... but then since when do people daily drive show cars? Or even drive their show cars?
 

Jombo

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2001
1,048
0
0
nice show car i guess.

it's auto, so he won't have to put his ps2 controllers down everytime he shifts..:p

i don't understand that, you have a 2+2 car, so you'd prob have one passenger, are you that unappealing that you have to entice your friend into your car by saying, well you can play ps2 while i drive?? or you love your car so much, that you'd rather play it in your car than in your living room? yea the racing games are much more fun when you play them while driving.. whatever
 

mAdD INDIAN

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,804
1
0
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: KokomoGST
Dummass idea... talk about reducing efficency... man, what a waste of a nice car.

650hp? What is he quoting? The est hp capacity for each turbo? Or the hp from his decals/paint job?

I dunno...while in terms of performance its a waste, but in terms of packaging/creativy..I thinks its pretty damn good. It must have been hell to do the plumbing for those turbos.

I dunno if can really call that creative... that's kinda like calling the Pontiac Aztec "creative"...
He didn't really need a tri-turbo to make a good show car. It prolly drives like crap on top of that... but then since when do people daily drive show cars? Or even drive their show cars?

Actually the Aztec is creative. Seriously. The entire interior with its cool features is very creative packaging..as is the exterior, sure its ugly, but the concept is pretty creative.

Lots of ppl daily drive their show cars, its more fun that way.