• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

When is the Michael Jackson verdice going to come back?

Originally posted by: Jnetty99
Now... Guilty!!! 50 years in federal pound me in the ass prison.
Click to expand...

Thats not punishment to him. A maximum security womens prison...now there's something cold blooded.
 
i wonder what those jurors must be going through right now... looks like its gonna be a close decision... since its taken this long, i bet he gets nailed on some things.
 
When the jury weighs the evidence and comes to a decision.

Did you expect that some-one outside the legal process would wave a magic wand and say that the jury has to come to a conclusion before the week-end so it can make the week-end tabloids?
 
Originally posted by: glen
I bet they find him not guilty
Click to expand...

He deserves to rot in jail.

The thing is, sure all these kids who've accused him could be lying. The real problem is he's stupid enough to put himself in that situation to begin with. After the first kid accused him...don't you think you'd say "woah...no more kids having sleepovers with me". Obviously anyone with reasonable intelligence would. So to me it's pretty obvious he's guilty as hell and deserves what he gets.
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: glen
I bet they find him not guilty
Click to expand...

He deserves to rot in jail.

The thing is, sure all these kids who've accused him could be lying. The real problem is he's stupid enough to put himself in that situation to begin with. After the first kid accused him...don't you think you'd say "woah...no more kids having sleepovers with me". Obviously anyone with reasonable intelligence would. So to me it's pretty obvious he's guilty as hell and deserves what he gets.
Click to expand...

He may not be guilty as hell; just of stupidity, arrogance and many loose screws (much more than an average ATOTer that can not google).

 
For the lawyers here, what's the general rule of thumb in correlating deliberation time and the verdict? ie, if the jury takes 5 days or more is the defendant *usually* guilty?
 
Originally posted by: glen
The more obvious the guilt, the quicker the verdict I woudl bet.
Click to expand...

Me too. The longer they deliberate the more I think it signifies that the evidence is shady or the charges unclear.
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Jnetty99
Now... Guilty!!! 50 years in federal pound me in the ass prison.
Click to expand...

Thats not punishment to him.
Click to expand...

I don't know about that... he looks more like a pitcher than a catcher... and he'll almost definitely be the catcher in prison.
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: glen
I bet they find him not guilty
Click to expand...

He deserves to rot in jail.

The thing is, sure all these kids who've accused him could be lying. The real problem is he's stupid enough to put himself in that situation to begin with. After the first kid accused him...don't you think you'd say "woah...no more kids having sleepovers with me". Obviously anyone with reasonable intelligence would. So to me it's pretty obvious he's guilty as hell and deserves what he gets.
Click to expand...

That would make him guilty of not having reasonable intelligence, which is not a punishable crime, else OT would be awfully quiet..
 
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Jnetty99
Now... Guilty!!! 50 years in federal pound me in the ass prison.
Click to expand...

Thats not punishment to him.
Click to expand...

I don't know about that... he looks more like a pitcher than a catcher... and he'll almost definitely be the catcher in prison.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding? MJ would whip out his army of undead backup dancers and rule the prison with an iron c0ck.
 
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: glen
I bet they find him not guilty
Click to expand...

He deserves to rot in jail.

The thing is, sure all these kids who've accused him could be lying. The real problem is he's stupid enough to put himself in that situation to begin with. After the first kid accused him...don't you think you'd say "woah...no more kids having sleepovers with me". Obviously anyone with reasonable intelligence would. So to me it's pretty obvious he's guilty as hell and deserves what he gets.
Click to expand...

That would make him guilty of not having reasonable intelligence, which is not a punishable crime, else P&N would be awfully quiet..
Click to expand...


Fixed

 
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: glen
The more obvious the guilt, the quicker the verdict I woudl bet.
Click to expand...

Me too. The longer they deliberate the more I think it signifies that the evidence is shady or the charges unclear.
Click to expand...

Well, the jury criteria for guilt is not the same as ours... they need to be able to convince that he did THAT crime beyond a REASONABLE doubt. Now, he might have diddle other kids in the past, but did he do it to this kid? Personally i think even though the prosecution put up a good case, i wonder if it's beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top