I would not go to either.
I love this country dearly, but I REFUSE to fight a war for oil led by the same pr!cks who are stripping away all of our freedoms. I also wholeheartedly disagree with the Korean bit, Bush says "lets cut off the oil" they say, ok, fine we see we cannot rely on you to keep up this attempt at peace, we NEED electricity. And while we are at it we may as well do something with the plutonium, because we sure as sh!t don't trust you to not bully us around (with the ever so sluggishly dwindling stock of nukes, wonder when the hell we or anyone else really planned on having them all dismantled? 2203?).
He gave flowery speeches in the months after 9/11, But since he has been in office has provoked renewed vigor in the middle east, both between Isreal and their enemies, and Iraq, then this bit with Korea (again Korea involves oil, funny isn't it). We have by and large lost more of our rights and our privacy than even Mr. Clinton dished out.
And right now if you told me that "for my country" I would be forced to go overseas and kill other people for THESE reasons, to hell with you, to hell with all of you. What a sick joke "here go to Iraq and kill so Mr. Cheneys former employer and still contributor can get rights to the pipeline there" and "goto Korea so we can justify doing away with them because we decided the oil we send to them should come here instead".
As for the complete RETARD who started this thread and all of you so gun ho to go killing pople, have fun, you sick freaks....You can certainly tell who has, and who has not, been involved in war before.
I doubt I have much to worry about between the injuries incurred in childhood (too much wreckless fun on bikes and seeing the bone of my kneecaps too often) and my crappy as heck eyesight, I don't think they would get so desperate as to draft me. If they indeed draft anyone.