When does the economy take a noticeable hit from Project 2025's administrative policies?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

When does the economy take a noticeable hit from Project 2025's administrative policies?

  • Within a month

    Votes: 6 23.1%
  • Within 3 months

    Votes: 12 46.2%
  • Within 6 months

    Votes: 6 23.1%
  • By the end of the year

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • Not until 2026

    Votes: 1 3.8%

  • Total voters
    26
Dec 10, 2005
27,748
12,224
136
I don't know but firing 300,000 federal workers can't possibly be good for the economy.
What could go wrong with firing a huge chunk of federal workers whose jobs you don't understand or whose work is supported by an unknown number of private companies, and just assuming that these people can get jobs in the private sector and all will be fine?
 

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,042
9,301
136
What could go wrong with firing a huge chunk of federal workers whose jobs you don't understand or whose work is supported by an unknown number of private companies, and just assuming that these people can get jobs in the private sector and all will be fine?

-Hey if unemployment starts skyrocketing... Fed brings down those interest rates!

We got ourselves a win boys!

Guys?

What's with all the chains and baseball bats?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dank69

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,091
18,589
146
Somebody probably made him watch “Landman”, so now he’s onboard with the idea that there’s a “magical price of $76/barrel” where oil is priced low enough that consumers continue consuming and buying guzzler trucks/SUV and OPEC won’t flood the market, but still high enough that exploration/ drilling will be profitable. So Trump is shooting for $76.

Landman was FULL of BS misinformation. The windmill rant was so detached from reality as to be farcical.

It is amazing to me that energy companies using the EXACT same playbook as the tobacco companies is successful.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,566
11,943
136
What could go wrong with firing a huge chunk of federal workers whose jobs you don't understand or whose work is supported by an unknown number of private companies, and just assuming that these people can get jobs in the private sector and all will be fine?
What's so funny is Trumpkin is going to be facing a firing squad from his voters. Virginia has an enormous amount of federal workers for US government offices in Virgina and DC. Also several military installations for all services. That state is the biggest recipient of Govment Gravy.
Can't wait to see the unemployment rates coming up.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
61,576
17,189
136
Did we have a poll for how soon Trump was going to blame Biden for current inflation. I guess he doesn't understand the rule that you as president own the current economy.

I already just assumed from day 1 that literally anything and everything bad will be blamed on Biden, Obama, or Clinton.

giphy.gif
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,307
16,657
136
I already just assumed from day 1 that literally anything and everything bad will be blamed on Biden, Obama, or Clinton.

giphy.gif

To be fair, Trump didn’t blame Biden for the war in Ukraine, he blamed Zelenskyy for starting it so…
 
Last edited:

LurchFrinky

Senior member
Nov 12, 2003
309
64
101
If you equate the market with the economy, then I guess the answer to the poll was 1 month and 1 day.
So less than 3 months, but not within month
 

MtnMan

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2004
9,339
8,674
136
I chose 3 months, simply because of the lag between the effect, and reporting of the effect.

200,000 Federal employees have been fired, so far, with many more to come. This does not count those laid off because their companies contracts with the federal government have been cancelled.

The tariffs, both threatened and already in effect, haven't worked through the supply chain to the retail shelf.

It may not be "official" in that Trump may well ban the responsible agencies from reporting actual unemployment, GDP, inflation numbers. It is clear that telling the truth under Trump will either get you fired, sued, or both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenixgoon

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,448
31,424
136
Just a reminder which I will have to post regularly. The economy going into the election was according to the right leaning WSJ "remarkable". All the Trump MAGAts will try to claim Biden gave him a bad economy. Meanwhile Biden inherited a shitty economy but idiots blamed Biden
WSJ economy.JPEG
 
  • Like
Reactions: balloonshark

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,307
16,657
136
Interestingly most of the vote is for within 3 months. I didn’t vote but even 3 months seemed too soon but damn! Looks like I was wrong!