Just to keep things factual, that's not what the courts said. They said:
"The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability.[1] The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
I happen to agree with that, however in my opinion the health of the mother outweighs that of the still unborn baby no matter how far along it is and any such action that jeopardizes the mothers health but will save the baby should only be made by the mother.
Their are no actual laws in many states restricting any such abortion, and the courts also ruled that states must allow abortion until the moment of birth for reasons of physical and mental health, including depression.
The court only said in the decision you mention that states have the ability to place very limited restrictions on abortion after viability, but the restrictions they can place still have significant limits. States are also not required to have any limits, and many don't.
Last edited: