When are we going to get past calling things racism

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
and start questioning the cultures. Every time there is a thread about a "flash mob" and "urban youth" there are always cries of racism that derail the thread. Statistically you cannot deny that the majority of those participants are black. That's not to say it's a black only event.

When are we going to be able to decouple culture from race? Admittedly I look down on those "urban youth" types.... they contribute nothing to society. Many of the people I work with are black... many much more talented than I. In the professional setting, I don't have predjudices; but on the street, I do. Is it because of the culture? It can't still be a RACE issue..... can it?

Why must I attempt to defend the fact that I'm not a ZOMG BIGOT racist EVERY TIME i criticize a black? Would this be a healthy discussion for not only us here on this board but for the country?
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,151
108
106
and start questioning the cultures. Every time there is a thread about a "flash mob" and "urban youth" there are always cries of racism that derail the thread. Statistically you cannot deny that the majority of those participants are black. That's not to say it's a black only event.

When are we going to be able to decouple culture from race? Admittedly I look down on those "urban youth" types.... they contribute nothing to society. Many of the people I work with are black... many much more talented than I. In the professional setting, I don't have predjudices; but on the street, I do. Is it because of the culture? It can't still be a RACE issue..... can it?

Why must I attempt to defend the fact that I'm not a ZOMG BIGOT racist EVERY TIME i criticize a black? Would this be a healthy discussion for not only us here on this board but for the country?

Once we drop the stereotypes, then we'd make progress....
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
I agree that it's possible to look down on behaviors like wearing saggy pants, rapping about using date-rape drugs, or speaking in non-standard English without being racist.

I think Justin Bieber looks like a buffoon wearing the pants, and he's a whitebread Canadian.
 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
Once we drop the stereotypes, then we'd make progress....

That is a tricky situation. Noticing patterns in behavior among similar things that are not human is a basic cognitive ability. Applying that same cognitive ability to people in order to anticipate a likely type of behavior is stereotyping, and often considered racist, but the fact is that it is human nature to look at an individual and quickly attempt to anticipate certain likelihoods about the nature of that individual based on our past experiences and pattern recognition. When there is a high degree of correlation between a certain human trait and something negative, whether it is a direct or indirect correlation, innocent people will unfairly suffer for it, but asking people to simply ignore their intuition is unreasonable.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,698
6,257
126
What are the contexts of the calls of Racism?

Sometimes people are a little premature in the accusation, but from what I have seen is that they are usually arguably accurate. Things like "baggy pants" or musical preference are hardly useful criticisms IMO. You may not like those things, but so what? How do those things have any bearing on the value of the people being discussed, especially when discussing serious social issues? I'm sorry, but focusing on such trivial things is almost always somewhat born of racism for it is an attempt to write off large groups for the most nonsensical reasons.

If you don't like the accusation(assuming that you're tired of it be thrown at you), then up your game and make appropriate non-dismissive points that might actually address the problems at hand.

Just sayin.
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,151
108
106
That is a tricky situation. Noticing patterns in behavior among similar things that are not human is a basic cognitive ability. Applying that same cognitive ability to people in order to anticipate a likely type of behavior is stereotyping, and often considered racist, but the fact is that it is human nature to look at an individual and quickly attempt to anticipate certain likelihoods about the nature of that individual based on our past experiences and pattern recognition. When there is a high degree of correlation between a certain human trait and something negative, whether it is a direct or indirect correlation, innocent people will unfairly suffer for it, but asking people to simply ignore their intuition is unreasonable.

Of course... I am not advocating that we simply ignore behaviors.

And you're right -- nothing is wrong with stereotyping... but too bad that word has been such a basis for racism and discrimination for centuries so it carries a bad connotation. It's entirely natrual as you say, and we actually need to do it.

If we can keep it in it's place and proper context, we can rid ourselves of the negative impact. For instance, if I am walking through a bad, drug-infested neighborhood, then anticipating certain behaviors is often the safe thing to do and what I would expect a reasonable person to do. But if you're looking for a job and are on an interview, well-dressed, and properly qualifed, then the "most people between 18-30 are criminals" (mainly, through bank robberies) type of conclusion can lead to prejudice. If that stat related to 18-30 year-olds in that line of work, then I think it's proper to make that conclusion.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,732
31,095
146
confusing culture with race is where it becomes problematic. I think many have gotten past racism...but you often have people that complain about others not getting past racism, yet they don't realize that their own criticisms are more race-related than culture related.

Or they can't quite distinguish that argument coming from others. Racism tends to remain problem because the true racists never realize they are, in fact, racist.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
That is a tricky situation. Noticing patterns in behavior among similar things that are not human is a basic cognitive ability. Applying that same cognitive ability to people in order to anticipate a likely type of behavior is stereotyping, and often considered racist, but the fact is that it is human nature to look at an individual and quickly attempt to anticipate certain likelihoods about the nature of that individual based on our past experiences and pattern recognition. When there is a high degree of correlation between a certain human trait and something negative, whether it is a direct or indirect correlation, innocent people will unfairly suffer for it, but asking people to simply ignore their intuition is unreasonable.
That's true, with the caveat that ofttimes our intuition or patterning serves us badly. I'm reminded of Bear Bryant when his lily white team was trounced by (I think) USC's integrated team. He asked the opposing coach "Where do you find these boys?" With a big grin, the coach replied "Alabama." Point being if one writes off young black men one can eliminate those with their pants held up to show their buttocks, but one also eliminates the Kennedy Reeds.
 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
Point being if one writes off young black men one can eliminate those with their pants held up to show their buttocks, but one also eliminates the Kennedy Reeds.

I guess it tips over into racism when certain people actually dislike someone simply for their race, or their intuition is either far too simplistic. If I was walking down an empty street, and a young black male with fancy sneakers and his pants around his knees was walking across my path, I would be justifiably on guard. If another black male was wearing a decent pair of jeans properly pulled up and a neat polo shirt, I would be considerably more at ease. Granted I'd behave similarly if those situations were the same and they were both white, but I'd be lying if I said I gave zero weight to skin color. If the individual were Asian in both these circumstances, I would probably have zero anxiety.
 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
That's true, with the caveat that ofttimes our intuition or patterning serves us badly. I'm reminded of Bear Bryant when his lily white team was trounced by (I think) USC's integrated team. He asked the opposing coach "Where do you find these boys?" With a big grin, the coach replied "Alabama." Point being if one writes off young black men one can eliminate those with their pants held up to show their buttocks, but one also eliminates the Kennedy Reeds.

I am a die hard Alabama fan. You are correct, it was USC. Alabama's team became integrated a few years after. Bryant wanted to integrate years earlier, but state politics at the time would not allow it.
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
confusing culture with race is where it becomes problematic. I think many have gotten past racism...but you often have people that complain about others not getting past racism, yet they don't realize that their own criticisms are more race-related than culture related.

Or they can't quite distinguish that argument coming from others. Racism tends to remain problem because the true racists never realize they are, in fact, racist.

This is what I'm talking about... being able to draw the line between the two is the issue. Some people can't wrap their mind around the fact that if someone dislikes aspects of a culture, even if that culture is predominately one race, they may or may not be racist. I've found that those who scream "racism!" are the ones who have race at the forefront of their minds. . not the accused.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,570
6,712
126
I agree with all this. I have nothing against black people. I am just repulsed by black skin. It reminds me of all that's dark and evil. White always means the good, the right, and the light. It has nothing at all to do with race, just color. Some colors are good and some are bad and that's just the way it is when you have eyes that can discriminate these things. And there isn't the slightest chance at all that a person as kind and honest and sincere as I am could possibly be a racist. I wouldn't love myself like I do if that were true.
 

LumbergTech

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2005
3,622
1
0
Inflammatory sarcasm is not constructive, and not welcome in the DC.

Fair enough, but does this thread have merit? To me it seems like someone wants to partake in racist behavior without fear of being called a racist. If he has a legitimate criticism to level against "a black" then he is free to do so, but to me this seems like thinly veiled racism. Moonbeam pointed out the irony of the OP and I accept that you do not welcome this form of discourse here, but the OP is of such low quality that I think it is at least equally offensive.

I kind of relate to what Moonbeam was attempting to say, because when I was growing up my best friend's father would often proudly proclaim: "I'm not racist. I just don't like em."
 
Last edited:

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,565
969
126
I guess it tips over into racism when certain people actually dislike someone simply for their race, or their intuition is either far too simplistic. If I was walking down an empty street, and a young black male with fancy sneakers and his pants around his knees was walking across my path, I would be justifiably on guard. If another black male was wearing a decent pair of jeans properly pulled up and a neat polo shirt, I would be considerably more at ease. Granted I'd behave similarly if those situations were the same and they were both white, but I'd be lying if I said I gave zero weight to skin color. If the individual were Asian in both these circumstances, I would probably have zero anxiety.

That would be obvious. For me it is when someone makes sweeping generalizations about a group of people based on their skin color, ethnicity, sexual preference, religion or even gender. And don't kid yourselves, this kind of "profiling" goes on all the time. Racism isn't dead.
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
Fair enough, but does this thread have merit? To me it seems like someone wants to partake in racist behavior without fear of being called a racist. If he has a legitimate criticism to level against "a black" then he is free to do so, but to me this seems like thinly veiled racism. Moonbeam pointed out the irony of the OP and I accept that you do not welcome this form of discourse here, but the OP is of such low quality that I think it is at least equally offensive.

I kind of relate to what Moonbeam was attempting to say, because when I was growing up my best friend's father would often proudly proclaim: "I'm not racist. I just don't like em."

This is exactly what I'm talking about. Keep race and culture separate. If we're talking ONLY about race and/or color then I AM NOT A RACIST. Do I have prejudices? yes, I make assumptions about things based on patterns that i've noticed. Maybe some have basis and others are baseless. If I simply wanted to "partake in racist behavior without fear of being called a racsist" why would i create a thread. Because of people that can't make the distinction between race and culture.

BLACKS, by themselves don't present any differently than WHITES or ASIANS, without context. As I said, in my professional environment, i see see many blacks,whites asians, latinos without a second thought. In that context there is no difference.

On the street, i'd feel safer walking near a few blacks in business attire than whites or latinos all thugged out with low baggy pants, tattoos, piercings and cursing at eachother.

Context.



It's not the race itself, it's how the cultures/subcultures present themselves. if you can't see that then maybe you're racist yourself and are trying to project it on me?

The point of the OP and maybe it's just poorly written, is to draw that line. Lets talk about it. if Charles thinks that this topic is simply a racist call-out, then lets lock it up. i think it's important because not only in the media, but even here in public conversation, it's misunderstood. Many fail to make the distinction.

I accept moonies comments, and that's a fair perspective. There was a time in my life that i was racist, i was a bigot, i was a homophobe. i'm trying to get over it.
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
That would be obvious. For me it is when someone makes sweeping generalizations about a group of people based on their skin color, ethnicity, sexual preference, religion or even gender. And don't kid yourselves, this kind of "profiling" goes on all the time. Racism isn't dead.


if you put your hand on a gas stove-top 99 times, and got burnt 99 times.... would you expect a different result from the 100th time? the human brain and many animals for that matter rely on patterns...

is it also profiling when you make assumptions based on indivudal cases, rather than sweeping generalizations?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,570
6,712
126
Lithium381: This is exactly what I'm talking about.

M: What you are talking about, then, is that you're not a racist, but you don't like black people because that is exactly what the quote you say you are talking about said. That looks for all the world to me to be a distinction without a difference.

L: Keep race and culture separate.

M: How are we going to do that? It's the culture of a race you don't like. You don't like Black culture and black is a race identifier.

L: If we're talking ONLY about race and/or color then I AM NOT A RACIST.\

M: But we aren't really talking just about color, are we, but rather other stereotypes of a race from which color is inseparable?

L: Do I have prejudices? yes, I make assumptions about things based on patterns that i've noticed.

M: And what I hear is that you make them about Black people.

L: Maybe some have basis and others are baseless.

M: And knowing which are what is where we really need to focus. This is what we really need to examine about ourselves, it seems to me and an important insight to have questions about.

L: If I simply wanted to "partake in racist behavior without fear of being called a racsist" why would i create a thread. Because of people that can't make the distinction between race and culture.

M: Or because of people who do not accept or question that such a distinction exists.

L: BLACKS, by themselves don't present any differently than WHITES or ASIANS, without context.

M: I do not think this statement makes sense because there are no Blacks Whites or Asians that present without context and this I think is just another prejudice you're not seeing. There is a context in which Blacks
Whites and Asians do not present differently to you and that is the context to which you give your stamp of approval, the contest that you consider normal and appropriate, your own context, 'the people like me' context.

As I said, in my professional environment, i see see many blacks,whites asians, latinos without a second thought. In that context there is no difference.

L: Actually without a second thought doesn't exactly sound right to me either. You see that when they are in your context you don't feel like you do toward them than you would if they were in the context you have stereotypes about, the context connected to their race culture. In your context you have the second thought that these are exceptions.

M: On the street, i'd feel safer walking near a few blacks in business attire than whites or latinos all thugged out with low baggy pants, tattoos, piercings and cursing at eachother.

Context.

It's not the race itself, it's how the cultures/subcultures present themselves. if you can't see that then maybe you're racist yourself and are trying to project it on me?

M: What I see is that the context and how people present themselves is a self construct of your own mind, a stereotype based on past experience, just as you realize, having everything to do with race, in my opinion.

L: The point of the OP and maybe it's just poorly written, is to draw that line. Lets talk about it. if Charles thinks that this topic is simply a racist call-out, then lets lock it up. i think it's important because not only in the media, but even here in public conversation, it's misunderstood. Many fail to make the distinction.

M: Personally, I think the topic is very important because it is important to you. I have a different attitude, I think, than you do. I don't like Hip Hop culture, the gang mentality, the mysogny, the style of dress and music. I see it as a need for self identity in the face of self hate produced in part by racism, a need to create a cultural identity that is hip, approved, sanctioned, an escape from feeling like a nobody or the bottom of society, and that projects many many of the negative attitudes, poor life choices, etc., that racism creates. I see a color of people trying to deal with the damage caused them by racism. I see a survival mechanism and a mechanical expression that is inevitable based on the experience that race has been subjected to. And I say these things without the feeling that I need to say I'm not a racists because I don't support or approve of Hip Hop culture. I don't care if somebody thinks I'm a racist. And that's my point.

I don't have any issue here and I think the reason is that I do not feel I am a racists. I don't have any questions about it. I'm not defensive.

L: I accept moonies comments, and that's a fair perspective. There was a time in my life that i was racist, i was a bigot, i was a homophobe. i'm trying to get over it.

M: I believe we are conscious of race in America and it can't be helped. It is the residue of racism in our past. That you have the intention to judge people by their character and not their race is a wonderful thing, in my opinion. I am very glad also to have this dialog with you. I believe we were all born good, that we are empathetic but fearful of difference and that the direction of evolution we need to go in to survive with this positive and negative feature of our character is to realize that we are all the same, that there really isn't anybody who is other and it sounds like you have moved a long way in that direction.

Next up is getting over our cultural bias. I think I'm going to try to get some low slung pants. I'm curious as hell as to how you keep them from falling off or if it's anything like what I do, walking around the house naked except for a pair of socks.

EDIT: Just ran across this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/14/baggy-pants-law-fine-louisiana_n_3080851.html
 
Last edited:

Charles Kozierok

Elite Member
May 14, 2012
6,762
1
0
Fair enough, but does this thread have merit? To me it seems like someone wants to partake in racist behavior without fear of being called a racist.

Yes, it does, and your comment sort of proves it -- you are automatically assuming that he is a racist just for wanting to discuss this topic.

If people can't tackle serious issues like this without being shut down or guilt-tripped into submission, what's the point of even having a place like the DC?
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,840
4,941
136
I agree with all this. I have nothing against black people. I am just repulsed by black skin. It reminds me of all that's dark and evil. White always means the good, the right, and the light. It has nothing at all to do with race, just color. Some colors are good and some are bad and that's just the way it is when you have eyes that can discriminate these things. And there isn't the slightest chance at all that a person as kind and honest and sincere as I am could possibly be a racist. I wouldn't love myself like I do if that were true.


320x240.jpg
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
We're not. Its a good blanket excuse for doing whatever you want and getting out of trouble, or not doing anything and expecting a handout.

Its also a good way to win internet arguments provided the other person is a coward.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,570
6,712
126
Charles Kozierok: Yes, it does, and your comment sort of proves it -- you are automatically assuming that he is a racist just for wanting to discuss this topic.

M: I see this as an interpretation that does not fit the facts for two reasons. First, regarding the automatic assumption that Lithium is a racist, LTech did not assume he was one but that it seemed to him, assuming that LT is a male, that he is one and, secondly, because LT saw the same thing that I saw, a distinction made in the OP that did not look like a difference based on what the content of the OP seemed to imply. At least one other person also cautioned about this possibility. In short, the OP seemed to worsen his claim in his opening post not defend his thesis.

This is why I attempted to mirror back to Lithium the exact implications of what I was seeing in his post in a way that would make it absolutely clear what I was hearing him say. I did not have an uncle to refer to who said what I saw being said so perfectly, so I said it as that uncle.

Apparently, also, LT thinks your remark:

"Inflammatory sarcasm is not constructive, and not welcome in the DC."

was directed at me. If so, I see that also as an interpretation. My intention was to communicate to Lithium what I was hearing in his post so as to provoke in him the exact same realization as what I was having about him. I was hearing racism and racism is what I expressed. I didn't react to his OP as inflammatory, sarcastic or not constructive but as an attempt to help him see what I was seeing just as his OP was his attempt to convince me of something. I believe my intentions are to promote self reflection and vision, not to put people down. A person is either open to points of view that critique or they become defensive about them, but that does not reflect on the critique but rather the attitude in which they are taken.

So far, it seems to me, that communication has broadened rather than being shut down and as a result of new things that he has said, I have become much more sympathetic to what he has tired to express. I hope this makes my point of view clearer to you.

CK: If people can't tackle serious issues like this without being shut down or guilt-tripped into submission, what's the point of even having a place like the DC?

M: I support your fidelity to this idea. I believe this discussion would not have taken this same course in P & N.