umbrella39
Lifer
- Jun 11, 2004
- 13,816
- 1,126
- 126
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Allow them onto Whitehouse West then. Problem solved.
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Allow them onto Whitehouse West then. Problem solved.
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Allow them onto Whitehouse West then. Problem solved.
She's free to camp outside. I wouldn't want her directly disrupting important Presidential business.
Originally posted by: Engineer
Yea, like 5 week vacations.
Originally posted by: RichPLS
Originally posted by: Engineer
Yea, like 5 week vacations.
Bush is better than I gave him credit for!
He is so polished and professional, he has people thinking his job is so easy and can take so much time off... That is the mark of a true leader![]()
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I guess you mean this mother?
She doesn't have to explain it. She's a flip-flopper, like so many of the anti-war crowd.CINDY 2004
THE REPORTER of Vacaville, CA published an account of Cindy Sheehan's visit with the president at Fort Lewis near Seattle on June 24, 2004:
"'I now know he's sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis,' Cindy said after their meeting. 'I know he's sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he's a man of faith.'
"The meeting didn't last long, but in their time with Bush, Cindy spoke about Casey and asked the president to make her son's sacrifice count for something. They also spoke of their faith.
"The trip had one benefit that none of the Sheehans expected.
"For a moment, life returned to the way it was before Casey died. They laughed, joked and bickered playfully as they briefly toured Seattle.
For the first time in 11 weeks, they felt whole again.
"'That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy said."
CINDY 2005
Sheehan's current comments are a striking departure.
She vowed on Sunday to continue her protest until she can personally ask Bush: "Why did you kill my son?"
In an interview on CNN, she claimed Bush "acted like it was party" when she met him last year.
"It was -- you know, there was a lot of things said. We wanted to use the time for him to know that he killed an indispensable part of our family and humanity. And we wanted him to look at the pictures of Casey.
"He wouldn't look at the pictures of Casey. He didn't even know Casey's name. He came in the room and the very first thing he said is, 'So who are we honoring here?' He didn't even know Casey's name. He didn't want to hear it. He didn't want to hear anything about Casey. He wouldn't even call him 'him' or 'he.' He called him 'your loved one.'
Every time we tried to talk about Casey and how much we missed him, he would change the subject. And he acted like it was a party.
BLITZER: Like a party? I mean...
SHEEHAN: Yes, he came in very jovial, and like we should be happy that he, our son, died for his misguided policies. He didn't even pretend like somebody...
END
On her current media tour, Sheehan has not been asked to explain her twist on Bush; from praise to damnation!
It should anger you that American politics in general have deteriorated to the point where attacking or otherwise discrediting the individual takes precedent over attacking the message...this tactic is not exclusive to the Republicans, the NeoCons or the Bush Administration for that matter.That's the part that angers me. They aren't limiting their comments to criticizing her actions. They are attacking her personally. It is one of the signature tactics of BushCo and its minions
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
[L=Local resident Offers his land to protesters in Crawford]
Mattlage's distant cousin who owns nearby land, Larry Mattlage, fired a shotgun twice into the air Sunday but no one was injured. Fred Mattlage said he does not share his cousin's frustrations with the group, Jawad said.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blood is thicker than water, but not as thick as some peoples heads.
Agreed. I do believe, however, that not only is the Bush/Rove machine especially effective at such sleazy tactics, it is also especially shameless and vicious about using them. They've taken dirty politics to new lows.Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
It should anger you that American politics in general have deteriorated to the point where attacking or otherwise discrediting the individual takes precedent over attacking the message...this tactic is not exclusive to the Republicans, the NeoCons or the Bush Administration for that matter.That's the part that angers me. They aren't limiting their comments to criticizing her actions. They are attacking her personally. It is one of the signature tactics of BushCo and its minions
Just take a look at some of the anti-Bush posts on this forum, or the manner in which the left targets Bush...tend to be heavy on attacking Bush as a person and less on evaluating or criticizing his qualities as a President, and the policies of his Administration.
Dirty politics is certainly not exclusive to the Bush Administration, or American politics for that matter...I would imagine even the Roman Senate experienced its fair share of intrigue and character smearing in the name of consolidating power.
While the Bush Administration, or the Rove machine, might be particularly effective at utilizing such tactics, they are not the first, nor will they be the last.
Exactly. So you now agree I can freely criticize Sheehan just as you criticize me.Originally posted by: jimkyser
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I am not preventing her "choice." I am criticizing it. What gives you the moral authority to criticize my voice?
The same one that gives you the right to criticize her's.
Yes, he owned himself because it's precisely the response I was fishing for.Originally posted by: digiram
Originally posted by: jimkyser
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I am not preventing her "choice." I am criticizing it. What gives you the moral authority to criticize my voice?
The same one that gives you the right to criticize her's.
hahahahahaha.....pwned
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
If she's on public land it's one thing, but if she's on private she needs to move off it. Let her protest on the streets if she must, but not on someone elses lawn.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
She's a poplolly.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Exactly. So you now agree I can freely criticize Sheehan just as you criticize me.Originally posted by: jimkyser
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I am not preventing her "choice." I am criticizing it. What gives you the moral authority to criticize my voice?
The same one that gives you the right to criticize her's.
Glad we finally have that cleared up.
Actually, I do have more right to complain about it because personal flames are not supposed to be permissable in this forum. ATP&N is not Crawford and TLC is not Cindy Sheehan. There are different rules here.Originally posted by: jimkyser
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Exactly. So you now agree I can freely criticize Sheehan just as you criticize me.Originally posted by: jimkyser
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I am not preventing her "choice." I am criticizing it. What gives you the moral authority to criticize my voice?
The same one that gives you the right to criticize her's.
Glad we finally have that cleared up.
Yup, you can. But you have no more right to complain about those who attack you and others for it than they do. So quit your belly aching about it.
Oh, I've never criticized you for your position on this issue. Frankly I couldn't care less about the whole issue.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Actually, I do have more right to complain about it because personal flames are not supposed to be permissable in this forum. ATP&N is not Crawford and TLC is not Cindy Sheehan. There are different rules here.
