• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

what's your 3DMarks2001SE score?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I bought Radeon 9200 yesterday and run 3dmark2001 build 330 the score is 5352 with cat 3.2 and no oc...

Is that very low?

If so I might take it back for Radeon 9600 Pro next week....
 
My computer is pretty hurting...

Basically things have never run right since I bought it, but whenver my cpu doesnt crash or I can have it clocked at its original 1.2ghz it performs a fairly low score...

Geforce4 Ti 4200 at stock and cpu at stock is about 7750 if I'm lucky...

I really need to grab an amd 2100+ or something, a new motherboard, and new ram, then I will be happily using all of my vid card...
 
Originally posted by: Rottie
I bought Radeon 9200 yesterday and run 3dmark2001 build 330 the score is 5352 with cat 3.2 and no oc...

Is that very low?

If so I might take it back for Radeon 9600 Pro next week....
Click to expand...

list entire specs so you get an accurate answer, i dont think the PC in question is the one in your sig
 
Shady06

I got Duron 1.3 Ghz on ECS K7S5A mobo
2 stick of 256 DDR PC2100 (512MB total)
40GB Seagate and 40GB Matrox hard drives
Que 40x10x24x CDRW
generic 350 power supply
and of course brand new Radeon 9200 card
 
Originally posted by: Rottie
Shady06

I got Duron 1.3 Ghz on ECS K7S5A mobo
2 stick of 256 DDR PC2100 (512MB total)
40GB Seagate and 40GB Matrox hard drives
Que 40x10x24x CDRW
generic 350 power supply
and of course brand new Radeon 9200 card
Click to expand...

score seems fine, even a bit on the side. good job
 
Hmmm, my reply wasn't posted. I keep fair detail on o/c's, here's this one:
Overclock: Manual (260 MHz = 3.14 GHz)
Performance Mode: Standard
Memory Freq: 320MHz
Memory Accel: Enabled
DRAM Idle Timer & Refresh Rate: Auto
Mem 2-3-3-6-4
VDIMM: 2.75
Graphic Aperture: 128MB
Rage3D 371/335
I just tried it with the 3.5 catalyst and got 18130, which seems pretty much the exact same score. I don't like the 3.5 very much right now, it's giving me some weirdness in my other benchies. Mainly a drop in HD performance, but PCMark2k2 and the 9700Pro seem to not like eachother much.

EDIT: I ran 7800 (a 10X increase) when I first installed my 9700Pro on my old rig (P3-850 no o/c), but that was with some anomalies in video. 3dMark tests are highly dependent on video throughput,
 
18101 was my highest with my 9700 at 380/315 and my 1700+ at 2.5Ghz, I think I can another 100 points out of it, cause I just pushed my chip a little further, but I'm pleased enough.
 
I got 8,328 3dmarks on my AIW 8500DV, slightly oc'd. Rig is in the sig (P4 @ 2.1GHz and 256MB PC2100 DDR oc'd to PC2700 speeds).
 
Abit IC7, P4c 2.4, Radeon 9700 non-pro, Catalyst 3.4, and DX9... I get 14,200. Stock speeds on everything. That sound about right?
 
My wife's rig:

Radeon 9700 Gold
1gb PC2700
T-bred @ 1.47ghz
ECS k7s5a (SiS735) motherboard

3dmark2001: 10,300

I'd like opinions on that score...

 
I posted my results earlier in this thread and was pretty unhappy with them. I get my new video card soon and I am hoping for a double in score from a Radeon 9000 NP to Radeon 9800 Pro. I think reaching 15k+ is reasonable, at least I hope.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top