What's the defragger you use?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Originally posted by: RaNDoMMAI
Originally posted by: Bucksnort
XP Defragger while in safemode and pagefile set to none.

Why do u do it in safe mode?

How do u run it in safe mode?

btw, i use the one that came with windows. friend let me use diskkeeper to try it out and i didnt notice anything expect it was running in the background and it did slow my games down.

~RaNDoM

You have to boot into safe mode. Hold F8 while booting and choose Safe Mode. This is where the minimum number of drivers, etc. are loaded to run the PC, very useful for maintenance and troubleshooting. Since nearly nothing is running in the background, it is ideal for defragging, IMO.
 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
I'm running Diskeeper 7.
It's fast and rulez over the standard Windows defragger.
Can anyone tell me what improvements they made in version 8?


I`ve used both and prefer 8,here`s the improvements according to Executive Software.


Diskeeper 8.0 Trial - English
NEW! DISKEEPER 8.0 TRIALWARE! Maximize system performance with new Diskeeper 8.0. It?s quicker and easier to use than ever before with a new user interface, easier scheduling, and a faster defrag engine. Fully-functional, 30-day evaluation version.

New in Diskeeper 8.0

Faster, more efficient defragmentation engines designed specifically for your operating system.

Exclusive Terabyte Volume Engine (TVE) for rapid defragmentation of volumes with millions of files and from 100 GB to 4 terabytes each.

Greatly expanded centralized administration. Every Diskeeper 8.0 defragmenter can integrate with new Diskeeper Administrator Edition for full network control, detailed reports and automatic alerts for dangerously low free space and disk corruption problems.

Completely new user interface designed from the ground up for fast and easier scheduling and access to all Diskeeper features.

Quick tabs graphically display performance gains achieved with defragmentation. Also evaluates the condition of your disk against documented factors know to affect reliability and stability.

Graphically displays actual performance gains achieved.

Power management feature for laptop computers.

 

Slickone

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 1999
6,120
0
0
So for anyone that says they like Diskeeper, O&O, Perfectdisc, etc, have any of you tested to see if actually made any difference over using XP's built in defrag?
 

RollWave

Diamond Member
May 20, 2003
4,201
3
81
Originally posted by: basilisk420
Originally posted by: CorporateRecreation
O&O Defrag Pro
The quickest I've come across, plus different defrag methods make this my utility of choice.

I have tried ALL THE PROGRAMS and O&O is EASILY the best one...HANDS DOWN!
 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
So for anyone that says they like Diskeeper, O&O, Perfectdisc, etc, have any of you tested to see if actually made any difference over using XP's built in defrag?

Yes,in my case I find Diskeeper 8 is very fast,not just that it has more options like defrag MFT,paging file,also you have "set it and forget it "mode,I actually have it set to run auto defrag when it goes into screensaver mode.
 

Bucksnort

Golden Member
Aug 17, 2001
1,062
0
0
Originally posted by: sm8000
That's interesting. I use the Windows defrag while in safe mode too. We must be the only ones on the planet that do so! What's the advantage of setting the pagefile to zero during defrag?

Well let me rephrase that, I defrag in safemode only after I install a large program and I defrag with pagefile off about every 3 months. Other times i just use defrag while in windows. The pagefile is not defragged so setting it to none allows more through defrag and of course using it in safemode is more through due to nothing running in background.
 

ninjazed

Senior member
Nov 29, 2000
278
0
76
Originally posted by: Mem
So for anyone that says they like Diskeeper, O&O, Perfectdisc, etc, have any of you tested to see if actually made any difference over using XP's built in defrag?

Yes,in my case I find Diskeeper 8 is very fast,not just that it has more options like defrag MFT,paging file,also you have "set it and forget it "mode,I actually have it set to run auto defrag when it goes into screensaver mode.

I can't say if Diskeeper defrags "better" than the Windows built-in version, but it is without a doubt light years faster. Windows takes forever and even if I find my drive heavily fragmented, Diskeeper does the job in minutes. It integrates well with the XP OS too, something I've had a problem with in some Symantec products.
 

Slickone

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 1999
6,120
0
0
Originally posted by: Mem
So for anyone that says they like Diskeeper, O&O, Perfectdisc, etc, have any of you tested to see if actually made any difference over using XP's built in defrag?

Yes,in my case I find Diskeeper 8 is very fast,not just that it has more options like defrag MFT,paging file,also you have "set it and forget it "mode,I actually have it set to run auto defrag when it goes into screensaver mode.
But you haven't noticed an actual better defrag with it? ie. Difference in load times of different things afterwards.

Does being able to do the defrag faster matter much if it's going to be defragging when your away anyway?

Have you noticed a difference defragging the MFT and page file? Do the others not do this? Not giving you a hard time here, just curious, for my own knowledge.

 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
Have you noticed a differnce defragging the MFT and page file? Do the others not do this? Not giving you a hard time here, just curious, for my own knowledge.

The one built-in XP is made by same company I believe,think of it(XP one) as a lite version,Diskeeper 8 Pro has more defrag options so can do a better defrag job,as to speed,it`s a lot quicker then the XP one.

Have you noticed a differnce defragging the MFT and page file?

I like the fact that I can defrag MFT & page file,performance will vary between users PC so hard for me to give you a number,you can try the trial version and find out for yourself ;).




 

Slickone

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 1999
6,120
0
0
But again, you mention defrag speed. I was referring to speed differences after the defrag. And that was a separate question about just a normal defrag, than from the question about defragging the MFT, page file.