Saint Nick
Lifer
- Jan 21, 2005
- 17,722
- 6
- 81
I don't understand how anyone can tell me what I can or cannot put in my body. Who cares if it causes cancer, or helps people -- it is my body and I should be able to do as I please with it.
Fair enough. The costs do come down quite a bit when the drug patent expires. For something like cocaine, we could probably expect the prescription cost to be higher than current illegal costs but a legal non-prescription cost would probably be lower before taxes.
Maybe, maybe not. Drinks like Red Bull have about 5 cents worth of caffeine based on the price of caffeine pills yet they sell for more than $3 per can. If you include the cost of the can and the drink inside, that's still a markup of several thousand percent.
You probably remember people talking about ethanol fuel for cars and how it would be around $3 per gallon.... well how much is ethanol in the liquor store? Several thousand percent more expensive than $3 per gallon.
A pack of cigarettes apparently costs about 10 cents to produce, but where I live they cost over $10 per pack to buy. Again, that's several thousand percent markup for a legal product.
I guess the only thing legalizing stuff does is make it legal. Cost is still brutal.
I don't understand how anyone can tell me what I can or cannot put in my body. Who cares if it causes cancer, or helps people -- it is my body and I should be able to do as I please with it.
every drug addicted loser will move to california to get high and live on welfare
Until your ass passes the medical costs of taking care of yourself onto the tax payers because you smoked yourself into unemployment. Liberals love to play this double sided card, "Its my body but I want the tax payers to foot the medical costs because all health care should be "free" (as in those who pay taxes should foot the bill) even though I don't take care of myself."
Until your ass passes the medical costs of taking care of yourself onto the tax payers because you smoked yourself into unemployment. Liberals love to play this double sided card, "Its my body but I want the tax payers to foot the medical costs because all health care should be "free" (as in those who pay taxes should foot the bill) even though I don't take care of myself."
A lot more people that have never tried smoking pot would decide to give it a shot. And end up ruining their lives.
A lot more people that have never tried smoking pot would decide to give it a shot. And end up ruining their lives.
LOL because everyone who tries pot by definition ends up ruining their lives?
1. I hope it passes so that there are less lazy pot-heads around here.
2. I hope it doesn't pass because it means that MORE of my tax money will probably end up going to helping stupid people.
I smoke weed probably every day. I wake up and get to work on time and I don't slouch or get high when I go to work. There are tons of people like me. I have a friend who is going to UCLA and getting excellent grades and I have never met anyone who smokes as much weed as him. Another one of my friends is a very good and successful DBA he too smokes weed. People who want to be losers are going to be losers with or without marijuana. People who want to succeed will succeed with or without marijuana. It's the person not the drug.
A more accurate prediction: hardcore black market business men buy huge amounts of legal drugs in California then sell it outside of California.Fixed it for you.
Another one of those, checking in right here.
Until your ass passes the medical costs of taking care of yourself onto the tax payers because you smoked yourself into unemployment. Liberals love to play this double sided card, "Its my body but I want the tax payers to foot the medical costs because all health care should be "free" (as in those who pay taxes should foot the bill) even though I don't take care of myself."
A lot more people that have never tried smoking pot would decide to give it a shot. And end up ruining their lives.
Nothing will change. Half of California is already chillin' with Puff the Magic Dragon anyway, so the only difference will be that they won't have to poorly attempt to hide their altered state of mind. Oh, and Cheetos stock will rise considerably now that they don't have to hide their sudden case of the munchies.
I do foresee one positive side effect though. Perhaps we will see less unfunny pot gags in movies now, because Hollywood tends to think "taboo" subjects are funny. /shrug
Yeah, because Hollywood never has movies or gags about people getting totally s**tfaced drunk.
Until your ass passes the medical costs of taking care of yourself onto the tax payers because you smoked yourself into unemployment. Liberals love to play this double sided card, "Its my body but I want the tax payers to foot the medical costs because all health care should be "free" (as in those who pay taxes should foot the bill) even though I don't take care of myself."
Yes, but hopefully, it will become less "taboo" and thus, less "funny" and will appear in movies far less.
One can hope, right?![]()