Originally posted by: dullard
Just to get it out of the way, since it was posted in every football thread last week:
Oh wait, Colorado lost and will lose again when they play Texas.Originally posted multiple times by: ElFenix
ND is way overrated
colorado is underrated
Originally posted by: slvrsol
uhh. under the old system, texas and usc would not be playing each other if they remained undefeated.
I would agree that normally Colorado is better than Iowa St. However, a 7-3 team beating a 7-3 team isn't that uncommon and Iowa St. isn't that much worse than Colorado. It should have been an overtime game, not a 14 point win for Iowa St (if you take away two defensive touchdowns by Iowa St.)Originally posted by: ElFenix
they lost to a team they should have beaten. i blame the wind. did you see the game? kickoffs with the wind were going through the uprights no problem, but kickoffs into the wind were coming down at the 30. colorado just got backed up so much to begin with that an inferior ISU team could score more than it should have.
Originally posted by: slvrsol
I don't know about you but I would rather have USC play Texas than USC play the Big Ten champ in the Rose Bowl. There would be an outrage if USC ended up national champions if they didn't have to beat Texas, which is what would happen in the old system. The BCS tries to have #1 vs #2.. sometimes #3 gets thrown in.. but still better than the old system.. This is coming from a Trojan fan who was robbed two years ago.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
re: ND, they go up the poll too fast simply because they are ND and everyone on the planet seems to be a golden domer fanboy. they are overrated in the people polls, and i'm still right about that. are they better than ohio state? probably not. are they better than alabama? questionable. are they better than oregon? doubtful. ucla? i'll give it a toss. vt? i don't think so. i don't think ND is a top 10 team.
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: ElFenix
re: ND, they go up the poll too fast simply because they are ND and everyone on the planet seems to be a golden domer fanboy. they are overrated in the people polls, and i'm still right about that. are they better than ohio state? probably not. are they better than alabama? questionable. are they better than oregon? doubtful. ucla? i'll give it a toss. vt? i don't think so. i don't think ND is a top 10 team.
I'd say Ohio State is better then ND. Which Alabama team are you talking about (the Alabama team that blew out Florida would beat ND, but since Prothro is out, Alabama would not beat ND). Oregon with Clemens would beat ND, but without definetly not. If UCLA plays all 4 quarters, they might beat ND, but the way they normally play, probably not. I don't think ND has the speed on defense to disrupt Vick, so VT would probably win.
So yes, I think ND is overrated in the polls, but not as much as you make it seem.
I have ND 8th in my personal rankings.
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: ElFenix
re: ND, they go up the poll too fast simply because they are ND and everyone on the planet seems to be a golden domer fanboy. they are overrated in the people polls, and i'm still right about that. are they better than ohio state? probably not. are they better than alabama? questionable. are they better than oregon? doubtful. ucla? i'll give it a toss. vt? i don't think so. i don't think ND is a top 10 team.
I'd say Ohio State is better then ND. Which Alabama team are you talking about (the Alabama team that blew out Florida would beat ND, but since Prothro is out, Alabama would not beat ND). Oregon with Clemens would beat ND, but without definetly not. If UCLA plays all 4 quarters, they might beat ND, but the way they normally play, probably not. I don't think ND has the speed on defense to disrupt Vick, so VT would probably win.
So yes, I think ND is overrated in the polls, but not as much as you make it seem.
I have ND 8th in my personal rankings.