onebeeer2many
Member
- Aug 10, 2004
- 90
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Beller0ph1
A little background on me before you read...
- 12 years of Catholic education (8 grade school, 4 Jesuit high school)
- Senior at UW-Madison and still practicing
- Been involved with the Mass since 5th grade
I agree with the all or nothing. Since there are a multitude of different religions, you can pretty much pick and choose what you want. I don't like telling people that they are going to hell, or to actively convert them to Catholicism. If they want to convert, they will do so from themselves coming from my and others example. We even say in our Nicene Creed said at every Mass, "We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church". Notice how the word "catholic" is not capitalized. Used in this context, catholic means universal. But, to others who don't understand, it just means 1 church. What do I believe? 1 Church.
The RCIA program came up earlier in this "sophistcated" debate. Although its only 12 weeks, the Catholics that come out of it are often more Catholic than those born and raised in Catholic homes. This comes from the fact that they willingly choose to be Catholic, from the good works and such they see around them.
But just like any organization, the Church must have consistent rules and regulations. Just this summer, an amendment was made to the GIRM, the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (the "cookbook" for a Catholic Mass). This standardized such simple ceremony and procedure governing the distribution of Eucharist, when to sit, stand, or kneel, and other timing and behavior issues. This is to ensure that no matter what parish you attend Mass at, the Mass will be the same. Ever since they started saying Mass in the vernacular (natural) language of a population (post Vatican II), traveing Catholics may have only a general idea how far along they may be in the Mass. Now, with the changes to the GIRM, a traveling Catholic will know exactly what part the Mass is at. To me, traveling between my home parish and campus parish, the change is welcome since both had different traditions on when to stand after the Offering.
There are people that follow them to the letter, while there are others that don't. If I recall, the Jesuits have been sometimes the "black sheep" of the Catholic family, even though one of their primary vows is Obedience. If someone doesn't like the rules, they can leave. The Catholic population of the US may be falling, but is increasing in the rest of the world. There are other dioscese that have an abundance of priests, albiet outside of the US.
BTW, this issue has come up before. A quick search of "wheat host" on everyone's favorite search engine (*ahem* Google) brings up an article. The mother was wrong turning down the alternatives to the well defined doctrine. And I quote from the article:Why not take the alternative?The diocese has told Haley's mother that the girl can receive a low-gluten wafer, or just drink wine at Communion, but that anything without gluten does not qualify. Pelly-Waldman rejected the offer, saying her child could be harmed by even a small amount of the substance.
The bread species of the Eucharist does not have to be wafers either. At my campus parish, we use unleavened bread baked by one of the community members. However, it still has wheat gluten in it.
As to some of the responses on this board, I say take an educated stand instead of a knee-jerk response. The 1st amendment allows us the freedom of speech AND the freedom of religion. Let's keep this discussion civil and not impose too much on everyone's first amendment rights.
wel said. :beer: