What strategy is best to deal with Islam? (POLL)

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

What policy is best to deal with Islam?

  • Nothing. Islam is not a threat.

  • Kill'em all and let Allah sort 'em out.

  • More Bush-style regime change

  • Containment

  • Engagement (like we do with China despite human rights abuses)


Results are only viewable after voting.

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
SphinxnihpS, do you really need to respond to every single previous post you have a problem with a personal insult? Couldn't you have limited your flaming to one insult per poster or something?
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,616
10,041
136
I had a coworker, an immigrant from Turkey. We never talked about such things but I'll never forget his assertion one day that religion is the real problem in this world. IOW, we'd be better off without religions!

Let's see, since this post was started a couple of days ago there was almost a horrific terrorist attack at Times Square. Network news (ABC) tonight indicated a newly found Pakistan connection. It looks like they are hot on the trail of the conspirators, who evidently didn't anticipate a possible abortion of their plot. I expect interesting revelations in the coming days.
 
Last edited:

Noobtastic

Banned
Jul 9, 2005
3,721
0
0
Pakistan?

Our ally on the war on terror?

Recipient of 21 billion in American tax dollars since 2002, which includes the 2.5 billion Obama pledged for the 2010 defense budget?

Nooo....it can't be.

I imagine if there was an Israeli connection the Left would be all over it...but Pakistani...nah, they are immune from attack. Our relationship will never end.

no preconditions...no negotiations...just free money all around.

Keep killin those Christians and massacring civilians living under the taliban Pakistan, America is right behind you!
 

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
SphinxnihpS, do you really need to respond to every single previous post you have a problem with a personal insult? Couldn't you have limited your flaming to one insult per poster or something?

I don't have a problem with one single post in this thread.

I am not the one "flaming" in here. In my opinion, when you post the trash that oozes out of that sewer you call a brain, you are the one flaming.

I highly suggest an education or euthanasia.
 

2Xtreme21

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2004
7,044
0
0
Pakistan?

Our ally on the war on terror?

Recipient of 21 billion in American tax dollars since 2002, which includes the 2.5 billion Obama pledged for the 2010 defense budget?

Nooo....it can't be.

I imagine if there was an Israeli connection the Left would be all over it...but Pakistani...nah, they are immune from attack. Our relationship will never end.

no preconditions...no negotiations...just free money all around.

Keep killin those Christians and massacring civilians living under the taliban Pakistan, America is right behind you!

Yup, because the Pakistani government sent him over here to do that. WAR!!!!!11
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Let's see, since this post was started a couple of days ago there was almost a horrific terrorist attack at Times Square.

It's ridiculous that this guy was ever let in the country let alone naturalized.
 

Noobtastic

Banned
Jul 9, 2005
3,721
0
0
Yup, because the Pakistani government sent him over here to do that. WAR!!!!!11

Why not?

Pakistan's ISI was complicit in 9/11, and aids the Taliban while also cooperationg with the CIA.

Oh, and it supports LeT in their homicidal and racist campaigns against Hindus in Kashmir and India.

But hey...who cares right, Obama is suckin the long dick of Mohamed...so the Left doesn't care.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,616
10,041
136
It's ridiculous that this guy was ever let in the country let alone naturalized.
Why do you say that (re: the NY would-be Times Square bomber)? They say there was nothing to finger him as a threat. Unless you think him being Pakastani made him a threat.
 

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
Why do you say that (re: the NY would-be Times Square bomber)? They say there was nothing to finger him as a threat. Unless you think him being Pakastani made him a threat.

That's what he thinks. That's why I keep calling him stupid. The ultimate irony is his supposed Christianity. Peace love and tolerance... LMFAO.
 

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sophomoric

Look at the picture closer. You are making a fool out of yourself.

jesus-with-lamb.jpg

This isn't (supposed to be) Jesus?
 

SphinxnihpS

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
8,368
25
91
That's not the same image. Take his avatar and blow it up 400%.

A pterodactyl!

My mistake (it's pretty small) I should have looked more closely.

OK, so probably no Christian irony angle. I'll just have to stick with mental retardation.