Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BarrySotero
The US was great because it had a core of people with high character and values. It was these people that led way to revolution, emancipation, defense vs Hitler etc. Economic and military superiority grew out of this rugged individualism and pursuit of virtue (the "pursuit of happiness" phrase in the declaration of Independence was using the Aristotelian meaning of happiness as the pursuit of virtue - it never meant people should be free to degenerate into porn, drugs and rock-n-roll"). Now the US is going in reverse and the average citizen is a spiritual pygmy as far as character goes. So we are collapsing into crap via intentionally down-bred mediocrity.
In fact, that's exactly what it meant. And the phrase 'pursuit of happiness' in DoI referred to the classical liberal inherent right to pursue one's own chosen occupation (for better or worse), and not be bound by birth to some kind of guild or caste as was common in England and the rest of Europe at the time.
As a believer in liberty, I see your socially-repressive fascist ideology as little different than some economically-repressive communist ideology. Like them, you're nothing more than a petty tyrant in your own mind for our own good. You are less than mediocrity, unable or unwilling to fix yourself and blaming the world for your own personal failures.
"Happiness" as used in DoI denoted a condition independent of (but not exclusive of) material circumstances. This article bit captures things nicley:
Locke wrote:
" 'The necessity of pursuing happiness [is] the foundation of liberty. As therefore the highest perfection of intellectual nature lies in a careful and constant pursuit of true and solid happiness; so the care of ourselves, that we mistake not imaginary for real happiness, is the necessary foundation of our liberty. The stronger ties we have to an unalterable pursuit of happiness in general, which is our greatest good, and which, as such, our desires always follow, the more are we free from any necessary determination of our will to any particular action, and from a necessary compliance with our desire, set upon any particular, and then appearing preferable good, till we have duly examined whether it has a tendency to, or be inconsistent with, our real happiness: and therefore, till we are as much informed upon this inquiry as the weight of the matter, and the nature of the case demands, we are, by the necessity of preferring and pursuing true happiness as our greatest good, obliged to suspend the satisfaction of our desires in particular cases.'
Just the ideas that inspired our intellectual Founders were primarily European imports, so that defining American phrase, ?the pursuit of happiness,? is not native to our shores. Furthermore, as the quotation from Locke demonstrates, ?the pursuit of happiness? is a complicated concept. It is not merely sensual or hedonistic, but engages the intellect, requiring the careful discrimination of imaginary happiness from ?true and solid? happiness. It is the ?foundation of liberty? because it frees us from enslavement to particular desires.
The Greek word for ?happiness? is eudaimonia. In the passage above, Locke is invoking Greek and Roman ethics in which eudaimonia is linked to aretê, the Greek word for ?virtue? or ?excellence.? In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle wrote, ?the happy man lives well and does well; for we have practically defined happiness as a sort of good life and good action.? Happiness is not, he argued, equivalent to wealth, honor, or pleasure. It is an end in itself, not the means to an end. The philosophical lineage of happiness can be traced from Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle through the Stoics, Skeptics, and Epicureans.
Jefferson admired Epicurus and owned eight copies of De rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things) by Lucretius, a Roman disciple of Epicurus. In a letter Jefferson wrote to William Short on October 13, 1819, he declared, ?I too am an Epicurean. I consider the genuine doctrines of Epicurus as containing everything rational in moral philosophy which Greece and Rome have left us.? At the end of the letter, Jefferson made a summary of the key points of Epicurean doctrine, including:
Moral.?Happiness the aim of life.
Virtue the foundation of happiness.
Utility the test of virtue.
Properly understood, therefore, when John Locke, Samuel Johnson, and Thomas Jefferson wrote of ?the pursuit of happiness,? they were invoking the Greek and Roman philosophical tradition in which happiness is bound up with the civic virtues of courage, moderation, and justice. Because they are civic virtues, not just personal attributes, they implicate the social aspect of eudaimonia. The pursuit of happiness, therefore, is not merely a matter of achieving individual pleasure. That is why Alexander Hamilton and other founders referred to ?social happiness.?
The Surprising Origins and Meaning of the ?Pursuit of Happiness?
http://hnn.us/articles/46460.html