What kind of GPU could God design?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

scooterlibby

Senior member
Feb 28, 2009
752
0
0
Thanks yasasvy thanks much. heheh :) good thread.

Lets just hope one falls from the sky into our laps. oh

PS you need a 600watt 55amps to use the card. If you have a lower end supply and wanna stick in Gods Graphics into a low end machine, Jesus gets mad and you get punished for your sin. When you try to boot up with a PSU thats say 550w ,, it will show the devil not BSOD but DSOD devil screen of death, then jesus punishes you by blowing up your whole rig,,,, good by CPU and everything else say goodbye to your precious RAM. Cant wait for this card to fly onto my lap in 2020 LOL God has the hardware its his angels dat sux in coding and cant make drivers.. soo its gonna take 10 years to put it all together and say JE is out using only 135watts with a noiseless 6000rpm fan at all times. Thank you and GB and GG and TC and you get the picture hehe,

I believe we have a clear cut winner. Please sticky and lock thread.
 

Skurge

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2009
5,195
1
71
A sawed off board with screws from Home Depot?


In all seriousness the OP's question is loaded and is just asking for a fanboy war in this thread.

And look who fires the 1st shot. (It's not you btw)
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
36
91
So what magical imaginary GPU could a magical imaginary man create?

Is this thread serious?
 

Skurge

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2009
5,195
1
71
So what magical imaginary GPU could a magical imaginary man create?

Is this thread serious?

Half the threads in this section aren't anymore serious than this one is.

I am enjoying some of the more funnier posts.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Do you think God could wipe the floor with His offering over nVidia and ATI?

Designing a GPU with an inversely proportional workload - i.e., the more intensive the application is, the faster the GPU runs, until infiniti. :hmm: In other words, the GPU would never run out of processing power.

Since this is impossible, I suppose I'll take a GPU that can ray-trace a fully interactive 3D-model with PhysX of Jessica Alba or Megan Fox or Eva Mendez to "get to know better" for say 24 hours?
 

anishannayya

Member
Jun 10, 2008
136
0
0
Oh boy, this will piss off a couple of people; but I can't resist.

He wouldn't create anything. How could a non-existent being create something?
 

scooterlibby

Senior member
Feb 28, 2009
752
0
0
Oh boy, this will piss off a couple of people; but I can't resist.

He wouldn't create anything. How could a non-existent being create something?


Eh that's pretty tame. How about this? God would create an Nvidia 5600 FX because God is an asshole.
 

anishannayya

Member
Jun 10, 2008
136
0
0
Eh that's pretty tame. How about this? God would create an Nvidia 5600 FX because God is an asshole.

Lol, I have one of those in an old P4. No joke, I cannot watch high resolution flash videos on that thing. Yea, I know. I planning on offloading it on eBay for $100.
 

blanketyblank

Golden Member
Jan 23, 2007
1,149
0
0
It doesn't matter what kind of GPU god designs. TMC will still fuck it up so it'll be delayed until they get their new process under control and when it is finally released it will be too hot and consume too much power for only a small increase in performance over ATI or NV's current offering.
Not to mention it won't support PhysX...
 

Campy

Senior member
Jun 25, 2010
785
171
116
We're all too old to have imaginary friends. the question is irrelevant
 

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
It doesn't matter what kind of GPU god designs. TMC will still fuck it up so it'll be delayed until they get their new process under control and when it is finally released it will be too hot and consume too much power for only a small increase in performance over ATI or NV's current offering.
Not to mention it won't support PhysX...

Folks, I think we have a winner!:D
 

tcsenter

Lifer
Sep 7, 2001
18,697
427
126
All the patent trolling firms as well as competing developers would sue over God's use of their IP (valid or not) in his card, he would go broke trying to license everything and pay everyone off to end the lawsuits, thus only Gates and Buffet could afford to buy the card. A total of 13 God cards would be sold before folding. You'll be able to snag one on Ebay four or five years later for a song.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
We're all too old to have imaginary friends. the question is irrelevant

To be fair, even the most hardcore atheist on Earth cannot deny at least an infinitesimal possibility that God may exist. It is impossible to prove that God does not exist. Although one's own beliefs based on the information around them can sway them one direction or the other. In addition, even the most hardcore scientists will admit that the theory of evolution is also just a theory since we can't say with 100% certainty that humans branched off from their common ancestor with chimpanzees about 5–7 million years ago. Both are theories, which (maybe both?) appeal differently to each person.

Also, don't forget that if the theory of evolution was proven as fact, it does not discount the possibility that it may have been God's hand that guided the evolution itself. Just throwing some food for thought out there :awe:

Perhaps it is healthier for society to question how things work and continue to discover new principles, rather than accept the principle that God did it, as to discount the need for a scientific explanation. Even so, a lot of great scientists were believers as well.
 
Last edited:

Voo

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2009
1,684
0
76
To be fair, even the most hardcore atheist on Earth cannot deny at least an infinitesimal possibility that God may exist.
They can, after all atheism is a belief just like any religion out there. You think of agnosticism - which imho is a much more reasonable stance at all ;)

And while evolution is a hypothesis (though it has lots of sound indices), god's existance isn't - well at least as long as we agree that we can't verify or falsify it with the scientific method.

Other than that if god exists I find it ridiculous to think that he would bother about such small things like creating new animals all the time, when he could just as well create the "framework" (i.e. physical laws, constants and so on) and let it do the work.. much more majestic in my opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.