DigDog
Lifer
- Jun 3, 2011
- 14,633
- 3,006
- 136
between 130 and 140. the general consensus amongst my football-loving colleagues is that i'm dumb.
test was modified for age.
i can relate to slugg. when i was younger, i simply did not care and would have not been able to find a reason why i need to focus on the test, why are these weird squares colored like this, why am i taking a test but nobody explained how this works, why am i supposed to figure this out by myself?
uh, yes and no.
pattern recognition is a pretty big thing for humans. and while the test might not mean much by itself, statistically, people who score 130 are smarter than people who score 80.
test was modified for age.
i can relate to slugg. when i was younger, i simply did not care and would have not been able to find a reason why i need to focus on the test, why are these weird squares colored like this, why am i taking a test but nobody explained how this works, why am i supposed to figure this out by myself?
This is why I laugh at anyone who thinks IQ is indicative of anything at all. Yeah, the entire capacity and capability of your brain can be folded into a single number ... LOL
Beethoven couldn't multiply numbers. When he needed to multiply for his finances he wrote out the equivalent addition problem and just added over and over again. There are many different types of intelligence!
Having said that, my IQ is 250.
uh, yes and no.
pattern recognition is a pretty big thing for humans. and while the test might not mean much by itself, statistically, people who score 130 are smarter than people who score 80.