• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What is your HTML performance 2D

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
beginner99 said:
Could anyone with a HD3000 run this test? Would be very interested if they get the same poor result.
Click to expand...
MacBook Air with Core i7-2677M (1.8GHz, HD3000): 6 seconds, using FF12

So, it appears the HD3000 is okay for this kind of work.

EDIT: Test was run in Windows 7 64-bit.
 
Turbonium said:
I just reduced the window dimensions and it seems to be running slightly faster (the average draw duration is now closer to 200 ms). It's still running at 4 FPS though, and bogging down the entire system.

EDIT:

2728 seconds (almost 46 minutes)

And I cheated by reducing the window dimensions to make it run faster, too.
Click to expand...

Hope you didn't stare at it while it's running. :twisted::awe:
 
I think this is more of a browser test than a hardware test. (except maybe G965 above) There are other HTML5 demos that are more suited for CPU or GPU.
 
lopri said:
I think this is more of a browser test than a hardware test. (except maybe G965 above) There are other HTML5 demos that are more suited for CPU or GPU.
Click to expand...

Well I've used IE9 on all my machines (except the Mac) and have had varying results.

3770K + GTX680: 6 seconds
3770K + HD4000: 6 seconds
i3 2120 + HD 2000: 10 seconds
C2D e7500 + G41: 13 seconds

The differences may not SEEM like much but if you break it down to percentages it's huge.
 
beginner99 said:
It means you either have a ultra crappy GPU (probably not the case) or a browser that does not support gpu acceleration or has it disabled.
Click to expand...
Ah, that's probably it then. I think I had hardware acceleration disabled.

At home, with it enabled, it completed in 7 seconds. GPU usage spiked at around 30%. It's pegged at 60fps, maybe I'm vsync limited. Disabling, and restarting Firefox.

Aaaand nope. Changing vsync settings or refresh rate didn't let it go past 60fps.
(i5 750 @ 2.66GHz, Win7, 4GB RAM, ATi HD 5850)


In the fishbowl, 2000 fish drops me down to 23fps, and puts my GPU usage at around 80%.
 
Last edited:
2is said:
10 seconds on a stock i3 2120 using the IGP (HD 2000)
Click to expand...

So something is very wrong with my notebook...strange because the result was consistent across browsers and Intel driver versions. Maybe something with power settings? also it seems it it would have such a huge impact...
 
Ok, it was Power settings:

Set everything to max performance and woops: 6 secs.
The effect is also extremely noticeable in the fishbowl test.

Never thought those settings have such a huge impact.
 
beginner99 said:
Ok, it was Power settings:

Set everything to max performance and woops: 6 secs.
The effect is also extremely noticeable in the fishbowl test.

Never thought those settings have such a huge impact.
Click to expand...

They have a massive impact. You may notice that in max performance Windows is performing significantly better as well. Current power saving while nice and efficient has a large and meaningful impact on the actual performance you see when using the computer.
 
chrome-6 seconds,IE10-7 seconds and firefox-14 seconds and the fish bowl was chrome-28,IE10-42 and firefox-12.This was on windows 8
 
This test makes me wish I still had a Socket A system laying around so I can run it with my Radeon 9800 Pro that I still have around in a box somewhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top