StrangerGuy
Diamond Member
- May 9, 2004
- 8,443
- 124
- 106
They are one of reasons why shit games get 9/10, heavily marketed ones gets 9.9999/10 and obscure but awesome ones gets 5/10.
whats a game magazine? Oh yea I remember seeing one in middle school I think
They (Editors) keep jumping ship don't they? LOL
Its not a good sign. I figure this year we will hear PCGamer goes the way of the other now defunct pc mags. I'm surprised they lasted this long.
![]()
for what its worth, this particular issue represents the high-water mark for video game-based periodicals, possibly for all of electronics-related print.
What do you take a shit with?
I havent liked gaming mags since PC Accelerator. Best one ever.
I bought a little microsoft title called freelancer because of them. It as such an awesome game that hardly anyone played...
PC Gamer is all but unrecognizable from when I first subscribed (around 1999).
It's always been somewhat of a sales rag (remember Rob Smith's enthusiastic editor's choice for the OC of NWN?), but it's gotten really bad lately.
This really burned me up:
DA is probably a very good game (haven't played it), but in the same issue they award Risen 65% on some extremly shaky criteria (characters move their arms too much when they talk? old lady has too nice of a figure?). I have played Risen, and even with it's problems it's worthy of way higher than that if you like RPGs.
It's almost as if they are using the issue to purposely shepard the RPG crowd towards DA and away from Risen. And that, to me, is ethically fraudulent.
Let's face it - PC Gamer has become nothing more than a shill pamphlet. I miss the mag I loved for so long (and the website too).
Data plans are cheap these days, and who doesn't have Wifi in the bathroom anyway?
I played a demo of Risen and I'm currently playing through DA and DA is like 1000 x better than Risen could ever hope to be.
I'm not a toilet reader. Going to the bathroom is a high speed tactical mission for me; get in, get the job done, get out.
I had a roommate who'd disappear for an hour at a time, reading (literally) novels on the pot. Never understood it.
PC Gamer is all but unrecognizable from when I first subscribed (around 1999).
It's always been somewhat of a sales rag (remember Rob Smith's enthusiastic editor's choice for the OC of NWN?), but it's gotten really bad lately.
This really burned me up:
DA is probably a very good game (haven't played it), but in the same issue they award Risen 65% on some extremly shaky criteria (characters move their arms too much when they talk? old lady has too nice of a figure?). I have played Risen, and even with it's problems it's worthy of way higher than that if you like RPGs.
It's almost as if they are using the issue to purposely shepard the RPG crowd towards DA and away from Risen. And that, to me, is ethically fraudulent.
Let's face it - PC Gamer has become nothing more than a shill pamphlet. I miss the mag I loved for so long (and the website too).
It's not only PC gamer, every review website does this also. It's just the growing trend of reviewers getting paid indirectly by giving hyped games high scores.
In general, the more marketing money you put in a game, the higher it's going to get reviewed. That's the sorry state of game websites today.
I mean seriously. GTA IV got a 10 on gamespot. Dragon Age gets a 9.5. Modern Warfare 2 gets a 9.5. What a joke. I remember back when getting a 9.0 was considered to be rare.
Speaking of story, DA had one of the most cliched stories I've ever seen. It's dialogue was good, but Bioware's innovation is absolutely zero. I've only played this generic fantasy storyline of saving the world from an ancient threat a hundred times.
I guess some people still enjoy untimely news, reviews without videos, low quality and a limited number of pictures, etc etc