Zing!Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Since any moron can shoot a rifle with great accuracy (at least according to many of the morons in this thread) I hope to see all of you trying out for the U.S. Olympic Rifle Team.
Zing!Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Since any moron can shoot a rifle with great accuracy (at least according to many of the morons in this thread) I hope to see all of you trying out for the U.S. Olympic Rifle Team.
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Since any moron can shoot a rifle with great accuracy (at least according to many of the morons in this thread) I hope to see all of you trying out for the U.S. Olympic Rifle Team.
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Since any moron can shoot a rifle with great accuracy (at least according to many of the morons in this thread) I hope to see all of you trying out for the U.S. Olympic Rifle Team.
thats not shooting. they have so much crap attached to them and their rifles who couldnt hit a bullseye. want real shooting, use iron sights like real men.
Originally posted by: TravisT
Without hunting many animal populations would be out of control. Hunting helps more than it hurts. It is the unresponsible hunters that are killing things to extinction. These pictures i saw of the deer hunters are no where near on the same level as the unresponsible hunters.
Originally posted by: brandonbull
Originally posted by: dahunan
Boasting about killing a wild animal with a gun seems retarded.. now if it was larger than you and you ran it down and killed it with your bare hands then you might have something worth talking about... but sniping an unsuspecting animal with a gun?? Whatever "comfused;
http://www.wildhorseprairie.com/photo.htm << they all look so proud.. but what was their accomplishment?
**I am not completely putting down hunting culture.. I just don't understand what there is to be proud of...
Considering most animals hunted have a size/speed/strength/natural weapon advantage over humans, what is the big deal?
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Anyway, there is no natural defence that any animal has to out-gun a high-powered rifle. I have a bit of respect for hunting, I can see it as a sport (unlike that ridiculous Nascar BS--that's not even racing!), but I think it would seem a bit more sporting if reduced to bow-hunting and knife-hunting. Think you're a man by picking off a grizzly from 100 yards away? How about taking one with a bowie knife? (whilst dressed in a loin cloth of course)
Then we see who the real hunter is.
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
This is the best Turkey I done ever shot. Don't take my picture while I am.............
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: FoBoT
when the world goes to crap and there is no food in a stores , don't go looking for help from a hunter, they'll remember this thread
That means there will not be any bullets either. So, how is a "hunter" going to be any help?
Originally posted by: bluemax
Any "sport" that can be done by a fat, drunk redneck who can barely tie his shoelaces while sober doesn't seem that much to be proud of.
![]()
Originally posted by: nweaver
and yet I bet half ATOT couldn't pull it off....Originally posted by: bluemax
Any "sport" that can be done by a fat, drunk redneck who can barely tie his shoelaces while sober doesn't seem that much to be proud of.
![]()
That's the American Way!Originally posted by: nweaver
I think my country bumpkin bro in laws have cases of ammo...but they live in Idaho, so that's normal. Plus, they have a couple of muzzle loaders and the tools to make ammo...
Originally posted by: bluemax
That's the American Way!Originally posted by: nweaver
I think my country bumpkin bro in laws have cases of ammo...but they live in Idaho, so that's normal. Plus, they have a couple of muzzle loaders and the tools to make ammo...
A.K.A. "If it moves - shoot it!"![]()
LOL!Originally posted by: nweaver
enough ammo/guns to stave off all but a full platoon of marines...check
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
I?m not a hunter either, but try shooting s moving animal from a couple hundred yards away. I would bet most people couldn?t do it.
Originally posted by: DeanI just like Deer Meat, especially ground.
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Anyway, there is no natural defence that any animal has to out-gun a high-powered rifle. I have a bit of respect for hunting, I can see it as a sport (unlike that ridiculous Nascar BS--that's not even racing!), but I think it would seem a bit more sporting if reduced to bow-hunting and knife-hunting. Think you're a man by picking off a grizzly from 100 yards away? How about taking one with a bowie knife? (whilst dressed in a loin cloth of course)
Then we see who the real hunter is.
That argument holds no water. We are 'man' by using the best tools we have. We didn't evolve to have enormous strength, speed, and razor sharp claws... we took the intelligence route and that in turn allowed us to develop better and better tools. We win.
Originally posted by: Kanalua
Because eating meat that you killed makes it taste that much better...
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Yup, I think DrPizza hit the nail on the head here. Bow hunting actually takes skill and I think you have a reason to brag there, but not really with a high powered rifle with the latest scope.Originally posted by: DrPizza
A) Most ethical hunters do NOT shoot at a deer that's running. Walking is okay, but running leaves too much of a risk of a wounded animal (rather than a quick humane kill.)
B) I'll use this analogy, since virtually everyone here will understand it. Suppose you go to 4 or 5 different stores, buy a ton of off-the-shelf components, go home, build a computer from scratch, get an operating system to work on it... Wouldn't you be proud of your accomplishment the first time it booted up; and possibly smile because of the satisfaction of achieving your goal? You'd probably have a bigger smile if it was a state of the art system with a top of the line graphics card, etc. This is close to the equivalent of setting a goal of getting a deer. Well, it's close. Success in the field often means spending 10's of hours (or 100's) in the woods, often (around here) in freezing temperatures, and sometimes with a foot or more of snow on the ground.
C) I'm going hunting for black bear along the PA/NY border tomorrow morning. Most bears are in the 200-300 pound range. However, that area is known to have produced several around 450 pounds. I've seen what a big bear can do; they're stronger than most people would ever believe. I'm bringing a hunting knife and a bow. Odds of successfully getting a bear? About 1 in 1000. If I get one, am I going to be grinning from ear to ear? You bet. For days.
Originally posted by: zinfamous
I completely agree with you. But my point, is that as we have evolved to the level where we indeed do win, we totally outclass any other naturally evolved animal in terms of ability to kill (by exploiting our wonderful tools). Again, the playing field is no longer level. Say a well-trained hunter strips himself of his assault rigle (please...is that sporting?), and replaces with a knife or very long spear. His pointy stabbing device now equals that of the bear's claws and teeth. There is a size and strength mismatch, sure, but the hunter is still at an advantage due to a more advanced intelligence, as you say. He could set up a pitfall and lead the bear into a trap. Can you tell me that a killing a bear in this way i sless satisfying than killing a bear who never sees you and is never a threat to your safety? please
put the two hunters together at a party. who's going to have the better story to tell and gain far more respect from everyone else?