What is it about humans that makes some of us think shooting an animal with a gun is brave or noble or tough

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

bluemax

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2000
7,182
0
0
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Since any moron can shoot a rifle with great accuracy (at least according to many of the morons in this thread) I hope to see all of you trying out for the U.S. Olympic Rifle Team.
Zing! :D
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Since any moron can shoot a rifle with great accuracy (at least according to many of the morons in this thread) I hope to see all of you trying out for the U.S. Olympic Rifle Team.

thats not shooting. they have so much crap attached to them and their rifles who couldnt hit a bullseye. want real shooting, use iron sights like real men.
 

Thraxen

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
4,683
1
81
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Since any moron can shoot a rifle with great accuracy (at least according to many of the morons in this thread) I hope to see all of you trying out for the U.S. Olympic Rifle Team.

thats not shooting. they have so much crap attached to them and their rifles who couldnt hit a bullseye. want real shooting, use iron sights like real men.

So I take it we can expect to see you Vancouver?
 

TravisT

Golden Member
Sep 6, 2002
1,427
0
0
Without hunting many animal populations would be out of control. Hunting helps more than it hurts. It is the unresponsible hunters that are killing things to extinction. These pictures i saw of the deer hunters are no where near on the same level as the unresponsible hunters.
 

Thraxen

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
4,683
1
81
Originally posted by: TravisT
Without hunting many animal populations would be out of control. Hunting helps more than it hurts. It is the unresponsible hunters that are killing things to extinction. These pictures i saw of the deer hunters are no where near on the same level as the unresponsible hunters.

To be fair though, we created that situation ourselves by wiping out the other predators.
 

pkme2

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2005
3,896
0
0
When I hunted animals and fowl, I never thought of it as being proud to have shot a helpless animal with a gun.

I thought of it as matching my skill against a adversary that had a better chance of surviving the day.

I've hunted deer and learned that they are very crafty and got 'whitewashed' several times. As I grew older and wiser, I learned.

Hunting gamebirds is another matter. You have to be a better shot because those birds are fast and smart too.

I was never proud to have used a gun or rifle to "get my game". IMHO, it was patience, follow through and markmanship that I took pride in, never the weapon.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,729
31,094
146
Originally posted by: brandonbull
Originally posted by: dahunan
Boasting about killing a wild animal with a gun seems retarded.. now if it was larger than you and you ran it down and killed it with your bare hands then you might have something worth talking about... but sniping an unsuspecting animal with a gun?? Whatever "comfused;

http://www.wildhorseprairie.com/photo.htm << they all look so proud.. but what was their accomplishment?

**I am not completely putting down hunting culture.. I just don't understand what there is to be proud of...

Considering most animals hunted have a size/speed/strength/natural weapon advantage over humans, what is the big deal?


sure they do.

I generally don't have a problem with hunting. If regulated properly, it's a good way to control animal populations and keep biodiversity in check. Of course, when you introduce feral pigs to an area just b/c they're fun to shoot; then you're causing problems.

Anyway, there is no natural defence that any animal has to out-gun a high-powered rifle. I have a bit of respect for hunting, I can see it as a sport (unlike that ridiculous Nascar BS--that's not even racing!), but I think it would seem a bit more sporting if reduced to bow-hunting and knife-hunting. Think you're a man by picking off a grizzly from 100 yards away? How about taking one with a bowie knife? (whilst dressed in a loin cloth of course)
Then we see who the real hunter is.
 

Thraxen

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
4,683
1
81
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Anyway, there is no natural defence that any animal has to out-gun a high-powered rifle. I have a bit of respect for hunting, I can see it as a sport (unlike that ridiculous Nascar BS--that's not even racing!), but I think it would seem a bit more sporting if reduced to bow-hunting and knife-hunting. Think you're a man by picking off a grizzly from 100 yards away? How about taking one with a bowie knife? (whilst dressed in a loin cloth of course)
Then we see who the real hunter is.

That argument holds no water. We are 'man' by using the best tools we have. We didn't evolve to have enormous strength, speed, and razor sharp claws... we took the intelligence route and that in turn allowed us to develop better and better tools. We win.
 

nweaver

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2001
6,813
1
0
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: FoBoT
when the world goes to crap and there is no food in a stores , don't go looking for help from a hunter, they'll remember this thread

That means there will not be any bullets either. So, how is a "hunter" going to be any help?

I think my country bumpkin bro in laws have cases of ammo...but they live in Idaho, so that's normal. Plus, they have a couple of muzzle loaders and the tools to make ammo...
 

nweaver

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2001
6,813
1
0
Originally posted by: bluemax
Any "sport" that can be done by a fat, drunk redneck who can barely tie his shoelaces while sober doesn't seem that much to be proud of.

;)

and yet I bet half ATOT couldn't pull it off....
 

bluemax

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2000
7,182
0
0
Originally posted by: nweaver
Originally posted by: bluemax
Any "sport" that can be done by a fat, drunk redneck who can barely tie his shoelaces while sober doesn't seem that much to be proud of.

;)
and yet I bet half ATOT couldn't pull it off....

Could be they're dumber / more drugged than the redneck in question? ;) ;)
 

bluemax

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2000
7,182
0
0
Originally posted by: nweaver
I think my country bumpkin bro in laws have cases of ammo...but they live in Idaho, so that's normal. Plus, they have a couple of muzzle loaders and the tools to make ammo...
That's the American Way!

A.K.A. "If it moves - shoot it!" :p
 

nweaver

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2001
6,813
1
0
Originally posted by: bluemax
Originally posted by: nweaver
I think my country bumpkin bro in laws have cases of ammo...but they live in Idaho, so that's normal. Plus, they have a couple of muzzle loaders and the tools to make ammo...
That's the American Way!

A.K.A. "If it moves - shoot it!" :p

tbh, if the proverbial fecal matter hit the fan, they wouldn't be too bad off...

lets see...Dairy farm for milk/meat/dairy products...check
farm for grain/veggies....check
large tanks of fuel to power machines to run the farm....check
plans to move all equipement to hydrogen power, that's created/stored using wind energy...check
hot girls...check (I married their hot sister)
enough ammo/guns to stave off all but a full platoon of marines...check
edit: to keep it on topic, out in the middle of the sticks, so they can hunt down bear/deer/badgers and club them to death...check
 

LeadMagnet

Platinum Member
Mar 26, 2003
2,348
0
0
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
I?m not a hunter either, but try shooting s moving animal from a couple hundred yards away. I would bet most people couldn?t do it.

But most of the time the animal is standing still, and are only <50 yards away.
 

overclock

Senior member
Apr 28, 2001
720
0
0
Originally posted by: DeanI just like Deer Meat, especially ground.

Q: What do you call a cow with no legs?
A: Ground beef.

My boss' dad is such a good shot he fired at an elk once and the guide he was with said to shoot it again. Well he fired right into the same hole and both rounds went into the animal's heart.

I might go hunting next year for an oryx. Good meat.

You really need to educate yourself OP before saying such stupid stuff.

 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,729
31,094
146
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Anyway, there is no natural defence that any animal has to out-gun a high-powered rifle. I have a bit of respect for hunting, I can see it as a sport (unlike that ridiculous Nascar BS--that's not even racing!), but I think it would seem a bit more sporting if reduced to bow-hunting and knife-hunting. Think you're a man by picking off a grizzly from 100 yards away? How about taking one with a bowie knife? (whilst dressed in a loin cloth of course)
Then we see who the real hunter is.

That argument holds no water. We are 'man' by using the best tools we have. We didn't evolve to have enormous strength, speed, and razor sharp claws... we took the intelligence route and that in turn allowed us to develop better and better tools. We win.


I completely agree with you. But my point, is that as we have evolved to the level where we indeed do win, we totally outclass any other naturally evolved animal in terms of ability to kill (by exploiting our wonderful tools). Again, the playing field is no longer level. Say a well-trained hunter strips himself of his assault rigle (please...is that sporting?), and replaces with a knife or very long spear. His pointy stabbing device now equals that of the bear's claws and teeth. There is a size and strength mismatch, sure, but the hunter is still at an advantage due to a more advanced intelligence, as you say. He could set up a pitfall and lead the bear into a trap. Can you tell me that a killing a bear in this way i sless satisfying than killing a bear who never sees you and is never a threat to your safety? please

put the two hunters together at a party. who's going to have the better story to tell and gain far more respect from everyone else?

Humans hunted bear, deer, elk, tigers, and freaking mammoths for millenia--and very successfully--with spears (and much less intelligence). Sure, the mortality rate was likely higher...but did it do anything to compromise the progression of our species? The evidence is overwhelming.

My argument holds plenty of water....as long as you realize what it is that I am arguing. ;)
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,729
31,094
146
Originally posted by: Kanalua
Because eating meat that you killed makes it taste that much better...

:thumbsup:

and that much better when you kill it with a bow; Ted Nugent style
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,729
31,094
146
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: DrPizza
A) Most ethical hunters do NOT shoot at a deer that's running. Walking is okay, but running leaves too much of a risk of a wounded animal (rather than a quick humane kill.)

B) I'll use this analogy, since virtually everyone here will understand it. Suppose you go to 4 or 5 different stores, buy a ton of off-the-shelf components, go home, build a computer from scratch, get an operating system to work on it... Wouldn't you be proud of your accomplishment the first time it booted up; and possibly smile because of the satisfaction of achieving your goal? You'd probably have a bigger smile if it was a state of the art system with a top of the line graphics card, etc. This is close to the equivalent of setting a goal of getting a deer. Well, it's close. Success in the field often means spending 10's of hours (or 100's) in the woods, often (around here) in freezing temperatures, and sometimes with a foot or more of snow on the ground.

C) I'm going hunting for black bear along the PA/NY border tomorrow morning. Most bears are in the 200-300 pound range. However, that area is known to have produced several around 450 pounds. I've seen what a big bear can do; they're stronger than most people would ever believe. I'm bringing a hunting knife and a bow. Odds of successfully getting a bear? About 1 in 1000. If I get one, am I going to be grinning from ear to ear? You bet. For days.
Yup, I think DrPizza hit the nail on the head here. Bow hunting actually takes skill and I think you have a reason to brag there, but not really with a high powered rifle with the latest scope.


here, here. this is exactly what I was talking about
 

Thraxen

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
4,683
1
81
Originally posted by: zinfamous
I completely agree with you. But my point, is that as we have evolved to the level where we indeed do win, we totally outclass any other naturally evolved animal in terms of ability to kill (by exploiting our wonderful tools). Again, the playing field is no longer level. Say a well-trained hunter strips himself of his assault rigle (please...is that sporting?), and replaces with a knife or very long spear. His pointy stabbing device now equals that of the bear's claws and teeth. There is a size and strength mismatch, sure, but the hunter is still at an advantage due to a more advanced intelligence, as you say. He could set up a pitfall and lead the bear into a trap. Can you tell me that a killing a bear in this way i sless satisfying than killing a bear who never sees you and is never a threat to your safety? please

put the two hunters together at a party. who's going to have the better story to tell and gain far more respect from everyone else?

I guess I don't understand the point of your argument then. Why would any sane hunter want to put themselves at risk for the sake of a better story? Also, although some people wouldn't care, I personally would prefer a quick kill. You are much more likely to get that with a gun than a spear/knife. I'm not really a hunter, but if I was I'd be doing it for food, not to put myself in harm's way.

 

nweaver

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2001
6,813
1
0
is it humane to spread the killing out by using crude weapons?

A bear would turn and fight, but if you catch a dear with a spear, it's gonna run....a long long ways before it dies, and that either means tracking a long time and then packing it back out, or leaving it to die somewhere else. Which is more humane (yes that can happen with a gun, but not nearly as often as with a spear or a knife)