BrokenVisage
Lifer
What is cup!? Baby don't drink me... don't drink me... no more
a special experience that two girls share
get your cup size here:
![]()
This sounds like one of those team building/communication workshop type exercises.
So nobody can define a cup? Don't say it's something you drink out of - because you can do that with a bottle. Uniquely identify a cup!
So nobody can define a cup? Don't say it's something you drink out of - because you can do that with a bottle. Uniquely identify a cup!
Uniquely identify a cup!
So nobody can define a cup? Don't say it's something you drink out of - because you can do that with a bottle. Uniquely identify a cup!
I'll give this another go.
1 cup is ~ 236,588 cubic mm. We could further refine this number to more digits.
We can define a meter as the distance light can travel in a vacuum during 1/299,792,458th of a second.
We can define a second as 9,192,631,770 periods of radiation corresponding to the transition between two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom at rest at a temperature of 0K.
Aliens could understand that.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_base_unit
There's two different definitions. One is 8 fluid ounces, as already stated. Another is an instrument of liquid containment meant for holding fluids suitable for human consumption. Stupid thread is stupid.
EDIT: Fine, and one with a large open mouth approximately of the same area as the body of the instrument, to exclude bottles.
Unless they exist in a solar system which is devoid of heavier elements like cesium. 😛:awe:I'll give this another go.
1 cup is ~ 236,588 cubic mm. We could further refine this number to more digits.
We can define a meter as the distance light can travel in a vacuum during 1/299,792,458th of a second.
We can define a second as 9,192,631,770 periods of radiation corresponding to the transition between two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom at rest at a temperature of 0K.
Aliens could understand that.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_base_unit
Human languages weren't written by programmers or engineers, so they aren't always rigidly defined, and people often don't take the time to learn them as they are, so there's a lot of word misuse and abuse going on all the time. Just today I heard someone use "ascertainable" when he meant "attainable."I'm just pointing out that it's amazing how humans can completely understand a concept without be able to explain it. If you were to describe a drinking cup, chances are it's ambiguous... but even though it's not quite explainable with 100% clarity, we still know what it is and how it works. Computers, on the other hand, do not work this way.
Sure, it sounds pretty dumb to come up with an accurate description for a cup. That's my point... if it's so dumb, then why can't we do it?
MagnusTheBrewer: there hasn't been 1 definition that is completely unambiguous. And we're talking about a drinking cup, not a unit of measurement or bra size.
Nebor: if you're so smart, why don't you define it? Give us a definition that accurately describes a drinking cup and nothing else. It's not easy! A retard can't do it.
I'm just pointing out that it's amazing how humans can completely understand a concept without be able to explain it.
This is my favorite so far... but you've described a jar :\
This is my favorite so far... but you've described a jar :\
The op is trolling some night-crawlers though...
The op is trolling some night-crawlers though...