• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What I have found out about God.

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
JEDIYoda said:
You juzt answered my question.....There is noway a Religion forum would ever be a sane place for any sort of discussion about somebodyd beliefs without the trash getting involved......was I nice enuff??
Click to expand...
Trash being anyone with the audacity to question someone's faith-based beliefs. Pretty much as nice as I expected.

Marius Dejess said:
Dear Power, please, no need to write so much, just concur with me...
Click to expand...
This pretty much sums up the depth of your proof.

I too am done with this thread.
 
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
______________________

Thanks, you new arrivals in my thread, for your appearance in my thread, it seems that the previous batch has already depleted their inane posting.

Now, I invite you to react to the OP, here it is reproduced below for your convenience.

Just try to discern that God and religion are not identical.


Marius Dejess said:
Title of thread: What I have found out about God.

I have found out that God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.

And how did I find that out?

By reasoning on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas.

What is the benefit to me from the concept of God as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning?

It brings me to the certain knowledge that God exists, whereas before I had only the belief that God exists, but not the certain knowledge.

Still I can't get God to talk with me.
Click to expand...
 
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
____________________


They can do whatever they want to call it (since their self-proclaimed proof of anything is in their head). - Usand

That is a gratuitous statement.

And you are taking to flight.

Please don't take to flight, examine the OP, see below, and face how I explain there that God exists, and that in the world outside my head and your head.

Take notice of this line:

By reasoning on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas.

Truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas are not only in the head, but also outside and independent of the head.

Don't take to flight after throwing a gratuitous statement, stay and let us talk about your proof that there is no God, start with your concept of God, okay?

Issuing gratuitous statements is easy, and taking to flight afterwards is convenient.

Marius Dejess said:
Title of thread: What I have found out about God.

I have found out that God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.

And how did I find that out?

By reasoning on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas.

What is the benefit to me from the concept of God as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning?

It brings me to the certain knowledge that God exists, whereas before I had only the belief that God exists, but not the certain knowledge.

Still I can't get God to talk with me.
Click to expand...


UsandThem said:
They can do whatever they want to call it (since their self-proclaimed proof of anything is in their head).

I'm done with this thread. I usually don't get sucked into bullshit like this, but I unfortunately took the bait. All I can do is leave.
Click to expand...

 
mopardude87 said:
Hey, i like shiny things! Speaking of fishing, the best damn bait still has been pepperoni bites. I had a fresh 20 pound line break and a hook big enough to hold a 30 pound bend like a toothpick. It got away though, would have been quite the catch. 🙂 Bigger then anything in there, that is for sure. Kinda surprised how quiet this thread got! 😀
Click to expand...

I think I'll give that a try although there's no such thing as a fish that big excepting Great Lake trout.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
I think I'll give that a try although there's no such thing as a fish that big excepting Great Lake trout.
Click to expand...

Was a friends catfish stock pond, big MAYBE on it being a snapping turtle but never saw one bobbing about so who knows. Best catch of my life was at this new spot where a friend invited me. I used a nightcrawler and like 5 minutes later i managed to catch a white belly bass. Friend said he been fishing that spot for 20 years, never seen one as they swim up against the stream for hundreds of miles. He was blown away as was his wife, they were nice enough to dress the fish and i offered them it for just taking me which they declined. Ex wife fried it and i had a few Pabt Blue Ribbon with it. Oh it was delicious but was a bigger fan of pirch for taste or catfish when i want some nice finger food!

I don't fish anymore, it goes against my new beliefs and practices. If i could put back every fish i prob would, but life goes on.
 
This thread IMO might be an interesting psychological study in our mentality, not "his". Parsing the language this appears to be a simple bot script. Obviously this could be a person but in that case It seems to be a reverse Turing test in that the sophistication of language and structure is very low level.

Yet it seems many are triggered by "him" or at least a very low level argument.

Given that I wonder why this is?
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
This thread IMO might be an interesting psychological study in our mentality, not "his". Parsing the language this appears to be a simple bot script. Obviously this could be a person but in that case It seems to be a reverse Turing test in that the sophistication of language and structure is very low level.

Yet it seems many are triggered by "him" or at least a very low level argument.

Given that I wonder why this is?
Click to expand...

I believe you're right. In this day and age people are triggered over anything. Honestly i think its been fun just watching the thread. I stick around out of morbid curiosity.
 
in concept god a creation of man to explain the unexplainable.
Humans have always sought out the explanations. Increasingly, we are using science and logic, but some still cling to faith. It will always be so.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
This thread IMO might be an interesting psychological study in our mentality, not "his". Parsing the language this appears to be a simple bot script. Obviously this could be a person but in that case It seems to be a reverse Turing test in that the sophistication of language and structure is very low level.
Click to expand...
Bingo, that's what I thought - bot.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
This thread IMO might be an interesting psychological study in our mentality, not "his". Parsing the language this appears to be a simple bot script. Obviously this could be a person but in that case It seems to be a reverse Turing test in that the sophistication of language and structure is very low level.

Yet it seems many are triggered by "him" or at least a very low level argument.

Given that I wonder why this is?
Click to expand...
Its because a lot of people are addicted to being offended. Hence why bots are so effective these days. A lot of whats out there is specifically designed to offend or shock.
 
Marius Dejess said:
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
____________________


They can do whatever they want to call it (since their self-proclaimed proof of anything is in their head). - Usand

That is a gratuitous statement.

And you are taking to flight.

Please don't take to flight, examine the OP, see below, and face how I explain there that God exists, and that in the world outside my head and your head.

Take notice of this line:

By reasoning on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas.

Truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas are not only in the head, but also outside and independent of the head.

Don't take to flight after throwing a gratuitous statement, stay and let us talk about your proof that there is no God, start with your concept of God, okay?

Issuing gratuitous statements is easy, and taking to flight afterwards is convenient.
Click to expand...
Don't quote me anymore, troll. It's obvious what you are doing at this point.

I'm doing my best to forget you are here. Hopefully soon others will tire of your games, and ignore you as well, so you can go back to whatever hole you crawled out of.
 
UsandThem said:
Don't quote me anymore, troll. It's obvious what you are doing at this point.

I'm doing my best to forget you are here. Hopefully soon others will tire of your games, and ignore you as well, so you can go back to whatever hole you crawled out of.
Click to expand...

No, it's not obvious what he's doing at this point, at least not obvious to you. IT IS A BOT, NOT A TROLL. Learn the difference.
 
Blocks the one person delivering negative energy which is op/bot, suddenly its so nice in here. Oh idk who came up with such a beautiful function but i am glad its here.
 
Marius Dejess said:
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
____________________


They can do whatever they want to call it (since their self-proclaimed proof of anything is in their head). - Usand

That is a gratuitous statement.

And you are taking to flight.

Please don't take to flight, examine the OP, see below, and face how I explain there that God exists, and that in the world outside my head and your head.

Take notice of this line:

By reasoning on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas.

Truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas are not only in the head, but also outside and independent of the head.

Don't take to flight after throwing a gratuitous statement, stay and let us talk about your proof that there is no God, start with your concept of God, okay?

Issuing gratuitous statements is easy, and taking to flight afterwards is convenient.
Click to expand...

The term "Creator cause" doesn't work in the english language so nobody has any fucking clue what you are talking about. Maybe you need to find a new translation app.
 
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
______________________________

Dear everyone, when I do not know what point a poster is making, I will not interact with him.

But when I am curious to find out from him, what is the most important point he wants to make, then I will ask him to please make your most important point concisely and clearly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top